Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting: how I teach it

被引:1
|
作者
Sutter, Francis P. [1 ]
Wertan, MaryAnn C. [1 ]
Spragan, Danielle [1 ]
Yamashita, Yoshiyuki [2 ]
Sicouri, Serge [2 ]
机构
[1] Main Line Hlth, Lankenau Inst Med Res, Dept Cardiac Surg Res, Wynnewood, PA USA
[2] Lankenau Heart Inst, Dept Cardiac Surg, Lankenau Med Ctr, Main Line Hlth, Wynnewood, PA USA
关键词
degrees Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting (robotic-assisted CABG); learning curve; minithoracotomy; coronary revascularization; minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB);
D O I
10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The first robotic cardiac operation was performed more than two decades ago. This paper describes the distinct steps and components necessary for teaching robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (R-MIDCAB). It also provides a general overview of the surgical robotic setup and ways to troubleshoot potential complications. The focus of robotic training is not only on the surgeon but includes an entire dedicated cardiac team and administrative institutional support. This team approach ensures that R-MIDCAB can be performed safely and reproducibly. Meticulous planning, incremental learning, and teamwork are the main factors leading to program success and optimal patient outcomes. Robotic-assisted internal mammary artery (IMA) harvesting and coronary revascularization via a small, anterior mini-thoracotomy has provided an alternative to sternotomy in selected patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Benefits include less postoperative atrial fibrillation, fewer blood transfusion, less time in the operating room (OR), less ventilatory support, fewer strokes, decreased intensive care unit stay and shortened postoperative length of stay all of which manifests as a decrease in institutional resource utilization. Recent data show that R-MIDCAB and hybrid coronary revascularization provides good longterm outcomes. In addition to patient satisfaction, there is an additional overall cost benefit to R-MIDCAB over traditional sternotomy coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), secondary to decreased hospital length of stay. Robotically harvesting the IMA, operating on a beating heart, and performing anastomoses through a small incision all require advanced training and incremental learning. Increased experience generally leads to shortened surgical times and fewer complications.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 353
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hiatal hernia after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery
    Abazid, Rami M.
    Khatami, Alireza
    Romsa, Jonathan G.
    Warrington, James C.
    Akincioglu, Cigdem
    Stodilka, Robert Z.
    Fox, Stephanie
    Kiaii, Bob
    Vezina, William C.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2021, 13 (02) : 575 - 581
  • [22] Robotic assisted coronary artery bypass grafting prospective randomized multicenter trial
    Gill, I
    Karamanoukian, H
    Damiano, R
    Landolfo, K
    Zenati, M
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (17) : 390 - 390
  • [23] Robotic-Assisted Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using the Right Gastroepiploic Artery: A Case Report
    Yamana, Ippei
    Fujikawa, Takahisa
    Kawamura, Yuichiro
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [24] Hybrid robotic coronary artery bypass grafting: how do we do it
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Kanei, Yumiko
    Puskas, John
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 5 (06) : 582 - 585
  • [25] How to improve performance of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting
    Bonatti, Johannes
    Schachner, Thomas
    Bonaros, Nikolaos
    Oehlinger, Armin
    Ruetzler, Elisabeth
    Friedrich, Guy
    Feuchtner, Gudrun
    Laufer, Guenther
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (05): : 711 - 716
  • [26] Totally robotic sutured coronary artery bypass grafting: How we do it
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Amabile, Andrea
    Balkhy, Husam H.
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 3 : 170 - 172
  • [27] Early clinical and angiographic outcomes after robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass surgery
    Halkos, Michael E.
    Liberman, Henry A.
    Devireddy, Chandan
    Walker, Patrick
    Md, Aloke V. Finn
    Jaber, Wissam
    Guyton, Robert A.
    Puskas, John D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 147 (01): : 179 - 185
  • [28] Robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass on a beating heart: Initial experience and implications for the future
    Turner, William F., Jr.
    Sloan, John H.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2006, 82 (03): : 790 - 794
  • [29] Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Transplant Vasculopathy
    Torregrossa, Gianluca
    Bravo, Miguel
    Mancini, Donna
    Puskas, John
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 108 (02): : E77 - E79
  • [30] The outcomes of robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in the Atlantic demographic-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
    Wilson-Smith, Ashley R.
    Wilson-Smith, Christian J.
    Smith, Jemilla Strode
    Osborn, Rowen
    Lo, Winky
    Ng, Dominic
    Hwang, Bridget
    Shaw, Justin
    Muston, Benjamin T.
    Williams, Michael L.
    Eranki, Aditya
    Gupta, Aashray
    Manuel, Lucy
    Szpytma, Malgorzata
    Borruso, Luca
    Pandya, Advait
    Downes, David
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 13 (05)