Regional Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Model Adaptability Research

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Sun, Jichao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Water Resource & Environm, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
landslide susceptibility; traditional statistical models; logistic regression models; machine learning models; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; MAPPING UNITS; INVENTORY; MAPS; GIS;
D O I
10.3390/rs16132305
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility denotes the likelihood of a disaster event under specific conditions. The assessment of landslide susceptibility has transitioned from qualitative to quantitative methods. With the integration of information technology in geological hazard analysis, a range of quantitative models for assessing landslide susceptibility has emerged and is now widely used. To compare and evaluate the accuracy of these models, this study focuses on Xupu County in Hunan Province, applying several models, including the CF model, FR model, CF-LR coupled model, FR-LR coupled model, SVM model, and RF model, to assess regional landslide susceptibility. ROC curves are used to evaluate the reliability of the model's predictions. The evaluation results reveal that the CF model (AUC = 0.756), FR model (AUC = 0.764), CF-LR model (AUC = 0.776), FR-LR model (AUC = 0.781), SVM model (AUC = 0.814), and RF model (AUC = 0.912) all have AUC values within the range of 0.7-0.9, indicating that the overall accuracy of the models is good and can provide a reference for landslide susceptibility zoning in the study area. Among these, the Random Forest model demonstrates the best accuracy for landslide susceptibility zoning in the study area. By extracting the extremely high susceptibility zones from the landslide susceptibility zonings obtained by six models, a comparative analysis of model adaptability was conducted. The results indicate that the Random Forest model has the best adaptability under specific conditions in Xupu County.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Regional landslide susceptibility zoning with considering the aggregation of landslide points and the weights of factors
    Wang, Xueliang
    Zhang, Luqing
    Wang, Sijing
    Lari, Serena
    LANDSLIDES, 2014, 11 (03) : 399 - 409
  • [42] GIS techniques for regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment: the Sicily (Italy) case study
    Manzo, G.
    Tofani, V.
    Segoni, S.
    Battistini, A.
    Catani, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 27 (07) : 1433 - 1452
  • [43] Rainfall-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and the Establishment of Early Warning Techniques at Regional Scale
    Hsu, Chia-Feng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (24)
  • [44] Regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment for the hilly state of Uttarakhand, NW Himalaya, India
    Vikram Gupta
    Sandeep Kumar
    Ramandeep Kaur
    Ruchika S Tandon
    Journal of Earth System Science, 2022, 131
  • [46] Regional landslide susceptibility assessment based on improved semi-supervised clustering and deep learning
    Jiang, Yuhang
    Wang, Wei
    Zou, Lifang
    Cao, Yajun
    ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2024, 19 (01) : 509 - 529
  • [47] Regional landslide susceptibility assessment based on improved semi-supervised clustering and deep learning
    Yuhang Jiang
    Wei Wang
    Lifang Zou
    Yajun Cao
    Acta Geotechnica, 2024, 19 : 509 - 529
  • [48] Landslide susceptibility assessment using uncertain decision tree model in loess areas
    Yimin Mao
    Maosheng Zhang
    Pingping Sun
    Genlong Wang
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76
  • [49] Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Using an Optimized Group Method of Data Handling Model
    Kadirhodjaev, Azam
    Rezaie, Fatemeh
    Lee, Moung-Jin
    Lee, Saro
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (10)
  • [50] Landslide susceptibility assessment using uncertain decision tree model in loess areas
    Mao, Yimin
    Zhang, Maosheng
    Sun, Pingping
    Wang, Genlong
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2017, 76 (22)