Optimization of truss structures using multi-objective cheetah optimizer

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, Sumit [1 ]
Tejani, Ghanshyam G. [2 ]
Mehta, Pranav [3 ]
Sait, Sadiq M. [4 ]
Yildiz, Ali Riza [5 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Australian Maritime Coll, Coll Sci & Engn, Launceston, Australia
[2] Neptune Edge, Ethics Infotech, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[3] Univ Dharmsinh Desai Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Comp Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[5] Bursa Uludag Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkiye
[6] Torrens Univ Australia, Dept Comp Engn, Fortitude Valley Campus, Fortitude Valley, Australia
关键词
Multi-objective; truss design; computational analysis; exploitation; exploration; constraints techniques; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; MOEA/D;
D O I
10.1080/15397734.2024.2389109
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In this study, a multi-objective version of the recently proposed cheetah optimizer called multi-objective cheetah optimizer (MOCO) has been proposed. MOCO draws inspiration from the targeted hunting strategy employed by cheetahs, which involves a sequence of actions: searching for prey, patiently waiting for the right moment to attack, swiftly launching the attack, and then retreating from the prey and returning to their habitat. MOCO is the result of modification and enhancement from its single-objective counterpart, utilizing a Pareto dominance-based approach. This adaptation allows MOCO to efficiently handle multiple objectives, explores and exploits promising areas in the optimization landscape, and identifies non-dominated solutions, offering valuable tradeoff choices for decision-makers. To demonstrate its practical applications, the MOCO method has been employed to address five intricate structural design problems. These problems involve a pair of competing objectives: the minimization of structural weight and the reduction of maximum nodal displacement. To gauge the efficacy and efficiency of the proposed algorithm, a comparative analysis is conducted against three alternative state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithms. Furthermore, a rigorous evaluation is carried out utilizing hypervolume testing. The findings reveal that the MOCO algorithm surpasses the performance of the other algorithms, underscored by its capacity to uncover a diverse array of non-dominated solutions. To delve deeper into the experimental results, statistical analysis employing Friedman's rank test is employed. The solutions generated and the convergence patterns exhibited by the MOCO approach underscore its exceptional proficiency in resolving intricate design problems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-objective optimization based on an adaptive competitive swarm optimizer
    Huang, Weimin
    Zhang, Wei
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 583 : 266 - 287
  • [22] Optimal truss design with MOHO: A multi-objective optimization perspective
    Mashru, Nikunj
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Patel, Pinank
    Khishe, Mohammad
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [23] Multi-objective modified heat transfer search for truss optimization
    Kumar, Sumit
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2021, 37 (04) : 3439 - 3454
  • [24] Multi-objective heat transfer search algorithm for truss optimization
    Ghanshyam G. Tejani
    Sumit Kumar
    Amir H. Gandomi
    [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37 : 641 - 662
  • [25] Multi-objective heat transfer search algorithm for truss optimization
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Kumar, Sumit
    Gandomi, Amir H.
    [J]. ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2021, 37 (01) : 641 - 662
  • [26] Multi-objective modified heat transfer search for truss optimization
    Sumit Kumar
    Ghanshyam G. Tejani
    Nantiwat Pholdee
    Sujin Bureerat
    [J]. Engineering with Computers, 2021, 37 : 3439 - 3454
  • [27] A hybrid evolutionary graph-based multi-objective algorithm for layout optimization of truss structures
    Kaveh, A.
    Laknejadi, K.
    [J]. ACTA MECHANICA, 2013, 224 (02) : 343 - 364
  • [28] A hybrid evolutionary graph-based multi-objective algorithm for layout optimization of truss structures
    A. Kaveh
    K. Laknejadi
    [J]. Acta Mechanica, 2013, 224 : 343 - 364
  • [29] An Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization of Market Structures Using PBIL
    Li, Xinyang
    Krause, Andreas
    [J]. INTELLIGENT DATA ENGINEERING AND AUTOMATED LEARNING - IDEAL 2010, 2010, 6283 : 78 - 85
  • [30] Multi-objective optimization of structures using charged system search
    Kaveh, A.
    Massoudi, M. S.
    [J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2014, 21 (06) : 1845 - 1860