Optimization of truss structures using multi-objective cheetah optimizer

被引:1
|
作者
Kumar, Sumit [1 ]
Tejani, Ghanshyam G. [2 ]
Mehta, Pranav [3 ]
Sait, Sadiq M. [4 ]
Yildiz, Ali Riza [5 ]
Mirjalili, Seyedali [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Australian Maritime Coll, Coll Sci & Engn, Launceston, Australia
[2] Neptune Edge, Ethics Infotech, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
[3] Univ Dharmsinh Desai Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Nadiad, Gujarat, India
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Comp Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[5] Bursa Uludag Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkiye
[6] Torrens Univ Australia, Dept Comp Engn, Fortitude Valley Campus, Fortitude Valley, Australia
关键词
Multi-objective; truss design; computational analysis; exploitation; exploration; constraints techniques; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; MOEA/D;
D O I
10.1080/15397734.2024.2389109
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In this study, a multi-objective version of the recently proposed cheetah optimizer called multi-objective cheetah optimizer (MOCO) has been proposed. MOCO draws inspiration from the targeted hunting strategy employed by cheetahs, which involves a sequence of actions: searching for prey, patiently waiting for the right moment to attack, swiftly launching the attack, and then retreating from the prey and returning to their habitat. MOCO is the result of modification and enhancement from its single-objective counterpart, utilizing a Pareto dominance-based approach. This adaptation allows MOCO to efficiently handle multiple objectives, explores and exploits promising areas in the optimization landscape, and identifies non-dominated solutions, offering valuable tradeoff choices for decision-makers. To demonstrate its practical applications, the MOCO method has been employed to address five intricate structural design problems. These problems involve a pair of competing objectives: the minimization of structural weight and the reduction of maximum nodal displacement. To gauge the efficacy and efficiency of the proposed algorithm, a comparative analysis is conducted against three alternative state-of-the-art multi-objective algorithms. Furthermore, a rigorous evaluation is carried out utilizing hypervolume testing. The findings reveal that the MOCO algorithm surpasses the performance of the other algorithms, underscored by its capacity to uncover a diverse array of non-dominated solutions. To delve deeper into the experimental results, statistical analysis employing Friedman's rank test is employed. The solutions generated and the convergence patterns exhibited by the MOCO approach underscore its exceptional proficiency in resolving intricate design problems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-objective optimization of truss structures using the bee algorithm
    Moradi, A.
    Nafchi, A. Mirzakhani
    Ghanbarzadeh, A.
    [J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2015, 22 (05) : 1789 - 1800
  • [2] Multi-objective design optimization of geometrically nonlinear truss structures
    Talaslioglu, Tugrul
    [J]. KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2012, 39 (2B): : 47 - 77
  • [3] Multi-objective optimization of cancer treatment using the multi-objective gray wolf optimizer (MOGWO)
    Chen, Linkai
    Fan, Honghui
    Zhu, Hongjin
    [J]. MULTISCALE AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY MODELING EXPERIMENTS AND DESIGN, 2024, 7 (03) : 1857 - 1866
  • [4] Multi-Objective Optimization of Spatially Truss Structures Based on Node Movement
    Nan, Bo
    Bai, Yikui
    Wu, Yue
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (06):
  • [5] A Particle Swarm Optimizer for Multi-Objective Optimization
    Cagnina, Leticia
    Esquivel, Susana
    Coello Coello, Carlos A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 5 (04): : 204 - 210
  • [6] Multi-objective structural optimization for the automatic member grouping of truss structures using evolutionary algorithms
    Carvalho, Jose Pedro G.
    Vargas, Denis E. C.
    Jacob, Breno P.
    Lima, Beatriz S. L. P.
    Hallak, Patricia H.
    Lemonge, Afonso C. C.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2024, 292
  • [7] Multi-objective equilibrium optimizer: framework and development for solving multi-objective optimization problems
    Premkumar, M.
    Jangir, Pradeep
    Sowmya, R.
    Alhelou, Hassan Haes
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    Kumar, B. Santhosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 9 (01) : 24 - 50
  • [8] Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Bioinspired Underactuated Robotic Gripper Using Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer
    Mahanta, Golak Bihari
    Rout, Amruta
    Gunji, Balamurali
    Deepak, B. B. V. L.
    Biswal, Bibhuti Bhusan
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, ICRIDME 2018, 2020, : 1497 - 1509
  • [9] Multi-objective spotted hyena optimizer: A Multi-objective optimization algorithm for engineering problems
    Dhiman, Gaurav
    Kumar, Vijay
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 150 : 175 - 197
  • [10] A two-archive multi-objective multi-verse optimizer for truss design
    Kumar, Sumit
    Panagant, Natee
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    Bureerat, Sujin
    Mashru, Nikunj
    Patel, Pinank
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2023, 270