Cutting efficiency of different dental diamond rotary instruments for sectioning monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns

被引:0
|
作者
Borzangy, Sary [1 ]
Bahabri, Rayan Hassan [2 ]
Alsani, Abdulrahman Ahmad [3 ]
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen [1 ,4 ]
Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed [4 ]
AbdElaziz, Mohammed H. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Substitut Dent Sci Dept, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Endodont, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Ibb Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ibb, Yemen
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Dent Med, Crown & Bridge Dept, Cairo, Egypt
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Ceramic; Cutting effecincy; Diamond burs; Lithum dislicate; Zirconia; PULPAL RESPONSE; BURS;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04901-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the cutting efficiency of different diamond rotary instrument types for sectioning monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate anatomical crowns.Materials and methodsThe study used 30 diamond rotary instruments divided into three groups: Zirconia cutting diamond bur (White Z), super coarse grit diamond bur (KBlack), and medium coarse grit diamond bur (KBlue); Two subgroups were assigned based on the crown materials including monolithic zirconia (5YSZ) and lithium disilicate (e.max) ceramics. The cutting efficiency was assessed by measuring the time required to fully section the crowns, followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of the dental burs before use and after every sectioned crown. A three-way ANOVA examined the effects of bur type, material type, and sectioning stage. If interaction exists, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the different subgroups, followed by the Tukey post hoc test. The significance level was assigned at alpha <= 0.05.ResultsThe results exhibited various cutting efficiencies among diamond rotary instruments and ceramic crown materials. White Z demonstrated superior cutting efficiency of zirconia crown compared with KBlack and KBlue for the first cutting cycles (p <= 0.05); the results tend to be more comparable at the third cutting cycle. However, the super coarse diamond bur exhibited higher efficiency in cutting lithium disilicate crowns than white Z and KBlue burs through all three cutting cycles(p <= 0.05). The diamond bur-cutting efficiency diminished after each use, irrespective of the bur type or the crown material (p <= 0.05); this was represented by the reduction of carbon and increased nickel matrix ratio after each bur usage.ConclusionWhite Z diamond bur showed higher cutting efficiency of zirconia in the first two cutting cycles; super coarse diamond bur is more efficient for cutting lithium disilicate crown in all of the cutting cycles. The amount of diamond on the burs reduced after each use, with no great impact on the material type when sectioning lithium disilicate and 5YSZ crowns.Clinical significanceThis study provides valuable insights for dental practitioners in selecting the appropriate diamond rotary instrument for crown sectioning. Practitioners can minimize the risk of damage and reduce the time required for crown removal, improving patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [41] Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    Tallarico, Marco
    Barlattani, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (04) : 450 - 458
  • [42] The effect of thermocyclic aging on color stability of high translucency monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramics luted with different resin cements: an in vitro study
    Ashy, Linah M.
    Al-Mutairi, Adnan
    Al-Otaibi, Tariq
    Al-Turki, Lulwa
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [43] IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE CUTTING EFFICIENCY AND TEMPERATURE PRODUCTION OF TEN DIFFERENT ROTARY CUTTING INSTRUMENTS. PART II: ELECTRIC HANDPIECE AND COMPARISON WITH TURBINE
    Ercoli, Carlo
    Rotella, Mario
    Funkenbusch, Paul D.
    Russell, Scott
    Feng, Changyong
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 101 (05): : 319 - 331
  • [44] Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study
    De Angelis, Paolo
    Passarelli, Pier Carmine
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Boniello, Roberto
    D'Amato, Giuseppe
    De Angelis, Silvio
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (02): : 252 - 256
  • [45] 3D quantitative analysis and SEM qualitative analysis of natural antagonist enamel opposing CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia or lithium disilicate tooth-supported crowns versus enamel opposing natural enamel
    Woraganjanaboon, Piyarat
    Anunmana, Chuchai
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 16 (01): : 12 - 24