Cutting efficiency of different dental diamond rotary instruments for sectioning monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate crowns

被引:0
|
作者
Borzangy, Sary [1 ]
Bahabri, Rayan Hassan [2 ]
Alsani, Abdulrahman Ahmad [3 ]
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen [1 ,4 ]
Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed [4 ]
AbdElaziz, Mohammed H. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Substitut Dent Sci Dept, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Endodont, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[3] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Ibb Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ibb, Yemen
[5] Al Azhar Univ, Fac Dent Med, Crown & Bridge Dept, Cairo, Egypt
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Ceramic; Cutting effecincy; Diamond burs; Lithum dislicate; Zirconia; PULPAL RESPONSE; BURS;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-04901-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the cutting efficiency of different diamond rotary instrument types for sectioning monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate anatomical crowns.Materials and methodsThe study used 30 diamond rotary instruments divided into three groups: Zirconia cutting diamond bur (White Z), super coarse grit diamond bur (KBlack), and medium coarse grit diamond bur (KBlue); Two subgroups were assigned based on the crown materials including monolithic zirconia (5YSZ) and lithium disilicate (e.max) ceramics. The cutting efficiency was assessed by measuring the time required to fully section the crowns, followed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) of the dental burs before use and after every sectioned crown. A three-way ANOVA examined the effects of bur type, material type, and sectioning stage. If interaction exists, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the different subgroups, followed by the Tukey post hoc test. The significance level was assigned at alpha <= 0.05.ResultsThe results exhibited various cutting efficiencies among diamond rotary instruments and ceramic crown materials. White Z demonstrated superior cutting efficiency of zirconia crown compared with KBlack and KBlue for the first cutting cycles (p <= 0.05); the results tend to be more comparable at the third cutting cycle. However, the super coarse diamond bur exhibited higher efficiency in cutting lithium disilicate crowns than white Z and KBlue burs through all three cutting cycles(p <= 0.05). The diamond bur-cutting efficiency diminished after each use, irrespective of the bur type or the crown material (p <= 0.05); this was represented by the reduction of carbon and increased nickel matrix ratio after each bur usage.ConclusionWhite Z diamond bur showed higher cutting efficiency of zirconia in the first two cutting cycles; super coarse diamond bur is more efficient for cutting lithium disilicate crown in all of the cutting cycles. The amount of diamond on the burs reduced after each use, with no great impact on the material type when sectioning lithium disilicate and 5YSZ crowns.Clinical significanceThis study provides valuable insights for dental practitioners in selecting the appropriate diamond rotary instrument for crown sectioning. Practitioners can minimize the risk of damage and reduce the time required for crown removal, improving patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] In vitro assessment of cutting efficiency and durability of zirconia removal diamond rotary instruments
    Kim, Joon-Soo
    Bae, Ji-Hyeon
    Yun, Mi-Jung
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 117 (06): : 775 - 783
  • [2] CUTTING EFFECTIVENESS OF DENTAL DIAMOND ROTARY INSTRUMENTS
    NUCKOLS, GE
    BURGESS, JO
    DAVIS, RD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1990, 69 : 172 - 172
  • [3] In vitro study of the fracture resistance of monolithic lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate pressed on zirconia for three-unit fixed dental prostheses
    Choi, Jae-Won
    Kim, So-Yeun
    Bae, Ji-Hyeon
    Bae, Eun-Bin
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 9 (04): : 244 - 251
  • [4] Fracture behaviors of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic crowns with different thicknesses
    Yu, Tao
    Wang, Fu
    Liu, Yan
    Wu, Tao
    Deng, Zaixi
    Chen, Jihua
    RSC ADVANCES, 2017, 7 (41) : 25542 - 25548
  • [5] Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia
    Tuerp, Lisa
    Lehmann, Frank
    Wille, Sebastian
    Kern, Matthias
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2024, 160
  • [6] The effects of various scaling instruments on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate
    Yilmaz, Mustafa
    Demir, Esra
    Olcay, Emin Orkun
    EUROPEAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2023, 57 (03) : 133 - 137
  • [7] Fracture Load of Monolithic CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns and Veneered Zirconia Crowns as a Posterior Implant Restoration
    Kim, Jee Hwan
    Lee, Su-Jeong
    Park, Jun Sub
    Ryu, Jae Jun
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2013, 22 (01) : 66 - 70
  • [8] Comparison of cutting efficiency with different diamond burs and water flow rates in cutting lithium disilicate glass ceramic
    Siegel, Sharon C.
    Patel, Tejas
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 147 (10): : 792 - 796
  • [9] Fracture resistance of implant- supported monolithic crowns cemented to zirconia hybrid-abutments: zirconia-based crowns vs. lithium disilicate crowns
    Elshiyab, Shareen H.
    Nawafleh, Noor
    Ochsner, Andreas
    George, Roy
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2018, 10 (01): : 65 - 72
  • [10] A comparative study of the cutting efficiency of diamond rotary instruments with different grit sizes with a low-speed electric handpiece against zirconia specimens
    van Aswegen, Ane
    Jagathpal, Avish J.
    Sykes, Leanne M.
    Schoeman, Herman
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (01): : 101.e1 - 101.e8