AimTo examine and synthesise the current literature to gain insights into nursing students' experiences, their perceived learning effectiveness of patient safety and its influencing factors.DesignIntegrative review.Data SourcesCINAHL, Medline, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2011 to October 2023.MethodsOf the 5940 papers initially retrieved, 33 were included after title, abstract, and full-text screening. No papers were omitted through quality appraisal.ResultsDespite nursing students' generally positive attitude towards patient safety, their idealistic view did not translate into actual actions of upholding patient safety due to various factors. Moreover, their experiences and perceived effectiveness of learning patient safety were influenced by factors such as organisational safety culture and pedagogical contexts. Thematic analysis revealed four themes: 'perception, attitudes, and evaluation towards patient safety'; 'supportive organizational culture as impetus to promote patient safety'; 'perceived confidence, knowledge, and competence toward patient safety'; and 'educational contexts and pedagogies to promote learning of patient safety'.ConclusionsThere is an inadequate focus on patient safety in clinical education compared to classroom education. Given that the clinical setting serves as an authentic learning environment of patient safety, nursing faculties play a crucial role in reforming existing nursing curricula to integrate patient safety education in both settings to ensure continuity of learning. Clinical nursing leaders should also proactively review and reform organisational culture and practices to enable nursing students' acquisition and internalisation of patient safety learning.Implications for Nursing Education and ManagementThis review highlighted the need for further collaboration between nursing faculties and healthcare institutions to advocate an environment conducive to nursing students' effective learning of patient safety.Reporting MethodReporting adheres to the Reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
机构:
Univ West Attica, Sch Adm Econ & Social Sci, Dept Business Adm, Athens 12241, GreeceUniv West Attica, Sch Adm Econ & Social Sci, Dept Business Adm, Athens 12241, Greece
机构:
Southern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Discipline Nursing, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW, AustraliaSouthern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Discipline Nursing, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW, Australia
Diane, Russ
Whiteing, Nicola
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Southern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Discipline Nursing, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW, Australia
Southern Cross Univ, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW 2480, AustraliaSouthern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Discipline Nursing, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW, Australia
Whiteing, Nicola
Aggar, Christina
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Southern Cross Univ, Southern Cross Dr, Bilinga, Qld, AustraliaSouthern Cross Univ, Fac Hlth, Discipline Nursing, Mil Rd, East Lismore, NSW, Australia