Evaluation of fecal microbiota of late gestation sows in relation to pelvic organ prolapse risk

被引:0
|
作者
Kiefer, Zoe E. [1 ]
Koester, Lucas R. [2 ,3 ]
Studer, Jamie M. [1 ]
Schmitz-Esser, Stephan [1 ,3 ]
Ross, Jason W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Vet Microbiol & Prevent Med, Ames, IA USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Interdept Microbiol Grad Program, Ames, IA USA
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; fecal microbiota; vaginal microbiota; reproduction; sow; CHAIN FATTY-ACIDS; VAGINAL MICROBIOTA;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2024.1384583
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Sow mortality in the U.S. swine industry has increased in recent years, for which pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major contributor, accounting for 21% of all sow mortality. Dysbiosis of microbial communities has been associated with disease and reproductive dysfunction in several species, and previous studies have shown changes in vaginal microbiota in sows with increased risk for POP during late gestation. However, there is insufficient knowledge surrounding the potential relationship between fecal microbiota and POP in sows. Therefore, the study objective was to identify differences in sow fecal microbiota and determine if fecal and vaginal microbial communities are correlated in relation to POP risk. Methods: Sows were evaluated for POP risk using an established perineal scoring system, with a perineal score (PS) of 1 (PS1) presuming little to no risk of POP to a PS of 3 (PS3) presuming high risk of POP. In the current study, 2,864 sows were scored during gestation week 15, and 1.0%, 2.7%, and 23.4% of PS1, PS2, and PS3 sows, respectively, subsequently experienced POP. Fecal swabs (n = 215) were collected between gestation days 108-115, DNA was extracted, and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing libraries were analyzed using mothur, phyloseq and SAS in reference to PS and POP outcome. Additionally, co-occurrence networks were constructed using CoNet to compare fecal and vaginal microbiota from the same cohort of sows and identify correlations between different taxa. Results: Differences in fecal community composition (PERMANOVA; P < 0.05), structure (alpha diversity measurements; P < 0.05), and 13 individual operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were revealed between PS1 and PS3 assigned sows. No differences in fecal microbiota were detected as a result of POP outcome. However, the abundances of several taxa were correlated across sample collection sites, suggesting the fecal and vaginal microbial communities may be related to one another. Discussion: Collectively, fewer differences in the fecal microbiota exist in sows with differing risk for POP compared to the vaginal microbiota, suggesting the vaginal microbiome may be more relevant in relation to POP outcome, although correlations between fecal and vaginal communities may provide insight for strategies to combat POP.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of Maternal Supplementation with Rare Earth Elements during Late Gestation and Lactation on Performances, Health, and Fecal Microbiota of the Sows and Their Offspring
    Xiong, Yi
    Pang, Jiaman
    Lv, Liangkang
    Wu, Yujun
    Li, Na
    Huang, Shimeng
    Feng, Zhi
    Ren, Ying
    Wang, Junjun
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (10):
  • [32] A comprehensive evaluation of spontaneous pelvic organ prolapse in rhesus macaques as an ideal model for the study of human pelvic organ prolapse
    Li, Yaqian
    Liu, Jian
    Zhang, Ye
    Mao, Meng
    Wang, Hong
    Ma, Yidi
    Chen, Zhigang
    Zhang, Youyue
    Liao, Chengmin
    Chang, Xiaoqing
    Gao, Qianqian
    Guo, Jianbin
    Ye, Yang
    Ai, Fangfang
    Liu, Xudong
    Zhao, Xiaoyue
    Tian, Weijie
    Yang, Hua
    Ji, Weizhi
    Tan, Tao
    Zhu, Lan
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2023, 68 (20) : 2434 - 2447
  • [33] Family history as a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse
    McLennan, Mary T.
    Harris, Jenine K.
    Kariuki, Barbara
    Meyer, Sara
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (08) : 1063 - 1069
  • [34] Reply: The risk of pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy
    Husby, Karen R.
    Gradel, Kim O.
    Klarskov, Niels
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : 106 - 107
  • [35] IS FAMILY HISTORY A RISK FACTOR FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE?
    Shilo, Y.
    Stav, K.
    Bitman, G.
    Lindner, A.
    Schiff, E.
    Alcalay, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 239 - 239
  • [36] Nonobstetric Risk Factors for Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Miedel, Ann
    Tegerstedt, Gunilla
    Maehle-Schmidt, Marianne
    Nyren, Olof
    Hammarstrom, Margareta
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 113 (05): : 1089 - 1097
  • [37] Mechanism and Risk Factors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse - Review
    Bohiltea, Roxana Elena
    Cirstoiu, Monica Mihaela
    Turcan, Natalia
    Bohiltea, Laurentiu Camil
    Munteanu, Octavian
    Bodean, Oana
    Voicu, Diana
    Baros, Alexandru
    Bratila, Elvira
    13TH NATIONAL CONGRESS OF UROGYNECOLOGY (UROGYN 2016), 2016, : 50 - 55
  • [38] Family history as a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse
    Mary T. McLennan
    Jenine K. Harris
    Barbara Kariuki
    Sara Meyer
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2008, 19 : 1063 - 1069
  • [39] Lifetime Risk of Undergoing Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Smith, Fiona J.
    Holman, C. D'Arcy J.
    Moorin, Rachael E.
    Tsokos, Nicolas
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (05): : 1096 - 1100
  • [40] Intrapartum Risk Factors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Postpartum
    Saucedo, Alexander M.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Gregory, Tom
    Arya, Lily A.
    Lowder, Jerry L.
    Woolfolk, Candice
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Srinivas, Sindhu K.
    Tita, Alan T.
    Macones, George A.
    Richter, Holly E.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S250 - S251