Project Lifeline-II: Feasibility of Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

被引:0
|
作者
Cloutier, Renee M. [1 ]
Dowd, William N. [2 ]
Aldridge, Arnie [2 ]
Walsh, Caitlin A. [1 ]
Messman, Brett A. [1 ]
Northcott, Jessica L. [1 ]
Talbert, Abigail [1 ]
Manolis, Chronis [3 ]
Campbell, Vanessa [3 ]
Pringle, Janice L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Program Evaluat Res Unit, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh Med Ctr Hlth Plan, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
SBIRT; naloxone; substance use; opioid; community pharmacy; ALCOHOL-USE; DRUG; CARE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1177/00333549241277416
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: US community pharmacies are a unique and underused health service setting for identifying and potentially intervening with patients at risk of opioid overdose or opioid use disorder with evidence-based practices such as screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT). The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of implementing SBIRT in community pharmacies in an urban county in terms of engagement, reach, and equity across the cascade of pharmacy screening and care.Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older receiving a schedule II or III opioid prescription at 1 of 17 participating community pharmacies in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, were invited to engage in SBIRT as part of Project Lifeline-II from June 2020 through January 2023. Participants completed a prescreen and/or a full screen. We calculated the percentage of patients who participated across the cascade of pharmacy screening and care, overall and by sex (male and female) and race (Black and White).Results: During the study period, 1952 unique adults (79.6%) were screened at least once (52.1% female; 58.0% White, 30.7% Black). Patients who identified as male (vs female) and Black (vs White) were more likely to have a positive prescreen (14.7% male vs 9.8% female; 16.4% Black vs 9.5% White), receive and complete a full screen (82.7% male vs 80.0% female; 83.6% Black vs 78.4% White), and score positively on the full screen (26.6% male vs 20.4% female; 26.8% Black vs 21.9% White).Conclusion: Although additional research is needed to characterize the full effect of Project Lifeline-II on patient outcomes, our findings help reinforce the benefits of multipronged public health initiatives that include community pharmacists to address the substance use disorder crisis in the United States.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Developing and Implementing a Multi-Specialty Graduate Medical Education Curriculum on Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
    Tetrault, J. M.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2011, 32 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [32] EFFECT OF DEPRESSION ON RISKY DRINKING AND RESPONSE TO A SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL FOR TREATMENT (SBIRT) INTERVENTION
    Montag, A.
    Dusek, M.
    Mazzetti, A.
    Nelson, L.
    Ortega, M.
    Campillo, A.
    Calac, D.
    Nyquist, C.
    Chambers, C.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 38 : 257A - 257A
  • [33] Integrating Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for Substance Use into Prenatal Care
    Hostage, Jean C.
    Brock, Julia
    Craig, Wendy
    Sepulveda, Debra
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2020, 24 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [34] Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT): implementation barriers, facilitators and model migration
    Vendetti, Janice
    Gmyrek, Amanda
    Damon, Donna
    Singh, Manu
    McRee, Bonnie
    Del Boca, Frances
    ADDICTION, 2017, 112 : 23 - 33
  • [35] Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) Curricular Innovations: Addressing a Training Gap
    Gordon, Adam J.
    Alford, Daniel P.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2012, 33 (03) : 227 - 230
  • [36] SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) IN THE ED: POSITIVE FINDINGS FOR PATIENT SUBGROUPS
    Cherpitel, C. J.
    Ye, Y.
    Bond, J.
    Moskalewicz, J.
    Swiatkiewicz, G.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 33 (06) : 110A - 110A
  • [37] Interprofessional Student Training: An Evaluation of Teaching Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT)
    Kobayashi, Rie
    Schwartz, Catrina R.
    Willson, Megan N.
    Clauser, Janelle M.
    Mann, Donna P.
    Purath, Janet
    Davis, April
    Hahn, Patricia L.
    DePriest, Dawn M.
    Tuell, Erica J.
    Odom-Maryon, Tamara L.
    Bray, Brenda S.
    Richardson, Barbara B.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE IN THE ADDICTIONS, 2019, 19 (1-2) : 26 - 46
  • [38] SBIRT ASSIST Assessment Form-Inpatient Screening, Brief Intervention & Referral to Treatment
    Ling, L.
    Chen, Y. -I.
    Yao, C.
    Burge, S.
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2011, 32 (01) : 66 - 67
  • [39] Patient Acceptability of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in an Abortion Clinic Setting
    Appel, Lindsay
    Ramanadhan, Shaalini
    Hladky, Katherine
    Rawls, Courtney
    Welsh, Chris
    Terplan, Mishka
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2014, 35 (02) : 209 - 209
  • [40] MAKING SUBSTANCE SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT) WORK IN JUVENILE DETAINMENT
    Hunter, Scott R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (10): : S104 - S104