共 50 条
Hepatic and Overall Progression-Free Survival After Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) as First-Line or Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
被引:1
|作者:
Ghali, Helana
[1
]
Dugan, Michelle M.
[2
]
Aflatooni, Shaliz
[1
]
Boby, Aleena
[1
]
Depalo, Danielle K.
[2
,3
]
Laborde, Jose
[4
]
Choi, Junsung
[5
,6
]
Ahmed, Altan F.
[5
,6
]
Zager, Jonathan S.
[2
,6
]
机构:
[1] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Tampa, FL USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Cutaneous Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Chan Med Sch, Dept Gen Surg, Boston, MA USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Tampa, FL USA
[5] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Univ S Florida, Morsani Coll Med, Dept Oncol Sci, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词:
Melphalan;
Hepatic delivery system;
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion;
Uveal melanoma;
Metastatic melanoma;
Hepatic metastases;
Regional chemotherapy;
Hepatic melanoma;
Treatment line of therapy;
OCULAR MELANOMA;
CHOROIDAL MELANOMA;
UNITED-STATES;
IMMUNOTHERAPY;
PROGNOSIS;
LIVER;
D O I:
10.1245/s10434-024-16039-5
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Uveal melanoma often metastasizes to the liver, portending a poor prognosis. Melphalan/hepatic delivery system (HDS) via percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) is a minimally invasive means of circulating high-dose chemotherapy through the affected liver. This study evaluated melphalan/HDS use as either first-line or second-line treatment to guide treatment sequencing. Patients and methods: A retrospective review included patients with hepatic-dominant metastatic uveal melanoma who underwent melphalan/HDS treatment via PHP from 2008 to 2023. Results: A total of 30 patients were identified; 53.3% female, with a median age of 63.5 years (37-78 years). Median follow-up time was 14.5 months. First-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 17), liver-directed (n = 7), and immunotherapy (n = 6). Second-line therapies included melphalan/HDS (n = 6), immunotherapy (n = 5), and liver-directed (n = 3). Median hepatic progression-free survival (hPFS) for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 17.6/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.002). Median hPFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was not reached/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median overall PFS for first-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 15.4/8.8/9.2 months, respectively (P = 0.04). Median overall PFS for second-line melphalan/HDS, immunotherapy, and liver-directed therapy was 22.2/14.7/7.5 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Melphalan/HDS via PHP for metastatic uveal melanoma to the liver was found to have significantly improved hPFS and overall PFS when used as first-line therapy compared with immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy. PHP continued to demonstrate improved hPFS and PFS when used as second-line therapy compared with second-line immunotherapy or liver-directed therapy.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:9150 / 9158
页数:9
相关论文