How consumers process online hotel ratings

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Bi [1 ]
Ye, Tian [2 ]
Liu, Stephanie Q. [3 ]
Zhao, Yujie [4 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Management, 422 South Siming Rd, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Leeds Beckett Univ, Sch Events Tourism & Hospitality Management, 203 Macaulay Hall,Headingley Campus, Leeds LS6 3QW, England
[3] Ohio State Univ, Hospitality Management Program, 265C Campbell Hall,1787 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Shandong Univ, Sch Management, 27 South Shanda Rd, Jinan 250000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Product ratings; Numerical comparisons; Numeracy; Promotion focus; Consumption motivation; REGULATORY FOCUS; NUMERACY INFLUENCES; THINKING STYLE; FIT; PREVENTION; PROMOTION; SCALE; COMPREHENSION; SUBTRACTION; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.annals.2024.103822
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Online travel agencies commonly utilize 5-point and 10-point scales to display hotel ratings. When processing and comparing hotel ratings on different numerical scales (e.g., 4.1/5 vs. 8.4/10), what method(s) do consumers use? Through nine studies, this research shows that consumers tend to employ absolute differences (e.g., 5-4.1 vs. 10-8.4) or relative differences (e.g., 4.1 divided by 5 vs. 8.4 divided by 10) when making comparative judgments. Notably, the choice of method can lead to preference reversals. We further reveal that higher numeracy leads to greater reliance on relative differences. However, such an impact is attenuated under a utilitarian motive. Additionally, a greater promotion focus leads to greater reliance on absolute differences. The findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how consumers process hotel ratings. (c) 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of Gender and Expertise on Consumers' Motivation to Read Online Hotel Reviews
    Kim, Ellen Eun Kyoo
    Mattila, Anna S.
    Baloglu, Seyhmus
    CORNELL HOSPITALITY QUARTERLY, 2011, 52 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [32] How do extrinsic cues influence consumers' online hotel booking decisions? An event-related potential experiment
    Feng, Ping
    Wang, Jingqiang
    Ding, Xin
    Li, Cong
    Guo, Fumei
    Ding, Xinyi
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [33] How attitude ambivalence from conflicting online hotel reviews affects consumers' behavioural responses: The moderating role of dialecticism
    Akhtar, Naeem
    Sun, Jin
    Akhtar, Muhammad Nadeem
    Chen, Jing
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 41 : 28 - 40
  • [34] Inconsistent behavior in online consumer reviews: The effects of hotel attribute ratings on location
    Pedro Mellinas, Juan
    Nicolau, Juan L.
    Park, Sangwon
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 71 : 421 - 427
  • [35] Evaluation of the effect of online reviews on hotel ratings and overall score in Fermatean environment
    Thao, Nguyen Xuan
    Duong, Truong Thi Thuy
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (01) : 1067 - 1087
  • [36] Self-selection and non-response biases in customers' hotel ratings - a comparison of online and offline ratings
    Smironva, Ekaterina
    Kiatkawsin, Kiattipoom
    Lee, Seul Ki
    Kim, Jinhoo
    Lee, Chung-Hun
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2020, 23 (10) : 1191 - 1204
  • [37] Good or excellent? Factors determining online hotel ratings. A spatial approach
    Valenzuela-Ortiz, Andrea
    Castaneda, Jose-Alberto
    Chica-Olmo, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MARKETING & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 33 (02) : 208 - 232
  • [38] How hotel responses to online reviews differ by hotel rating: an exploratory study
    Lee, HyeRyeon
    Blum, Shane C.
    WORLDWIDE HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM THEMES, 2015, 7 (03) : 242 - 250
  • [39] How to Stick to Online Consumers: CRM Perspective
    Wang, Haiping
    COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, PT III, 2011, 233 : 224 - 231
  • [40] How to Stick to Online Consumers: CRM Perspective
    Wang, Haiping
    2010 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-LEARNING, E-BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, AND E-GOVERNMENT (EEEE 2010), VOL I, 2010, : 183 - 186