Questionnaire-Based Study on the Knowledge of Cervical Cancer and Attitude and Perception Toward Self-Sampling Method of Screening, Among Women in Sikkim, India

被引:0
|
作者
Lucksom, Pesona Grace [1 ]
Sherpa, Mingma Lhamu [2 ]
Pradhan, Anup [1 ]
Sherpa, Mingma [3 ]
机构
[1] Sikkim Manipal Univ, Sikkim Manipal Inst Med Sci, Dept OBG, 5thMile Tadong, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
[2] Sikkim Manipal Univ, Sikkim Manipal Inst Med Sci, Dept Biochem, Gangtok, Sikkim, India
[3] Sikkim Manipal Univ, Sikkim Manipal Inst Med Sci, Dept Pathol, 5th Mile Tadong,East Sikkim, Gangtok 737102, Sikkim, India
来源
关键词
Cervical cancer; Screening; Self-sampling; Physician sampling; COLLECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-024-02049-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Cervical cancer (CC) is the second most common cancer among women in India and in Sikkim. Screening helps in prevention and early detection of the disease; however, pelvic examination for smear collection is not preferred by many. Self-sampling method can be a good alternative for collection of smears, thus increasing screening uptake. Therefore, a study was conducted to evaluate perception about self-sampling method of screening among women in Sikkim. Methodology A total of 210 women who consented for this study were screened for cervical cancer using Pap smear and HPV DNA. Women were taught to collect their self-sample for HPV DNA test. Questionnaires were used to assess their attitude toward self-sampling prior to collection of samples and perception, post-collection. Results Seventy-percent women knew that CC is the most common cancer among women in Sikkim. 73% knew that it could be prevented, but only 57% had knowledge about screening facilities in Sikkim. 50% women knew about HPV vaccination program in Sikkim. 96% women had never done a self-sampling, while 67% had never heard about it. There was a significant change (p value < 0.00001) in perception toward self-sampling after the procedure. Comparative analysis showed that women found self-collection easier than expected. If they had a choice, they would prefer self-sampling over physician sampling; however, due to their trust in physicians they still believed physician collected sample would be better. Conclusion Self-sampling is a socially acceptable screening technique and can increase compliance among socially shy community.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 370
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Knowledge, attitude, and practice on screening toward cervical cancer among health professionals in India-A review
    Chawla, Bhavika
    Taneja, Neha
    Awasthi, Aanchal Anant
    Kaur, Karuna Nidhi
    Janardhanan, Rajiv
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 17
  • [22] Self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: Empowering women to lead a paradigm change in cancer control
    Franco, E. L.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : E1 - E3
  • [23] A Randomized Trial of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling as an Intervention to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women With HIV
    Murphy, Jeanne
    Mark, Hayley
    Anderson, Jean
    Farley, Jason
    Allen, Jerilyn
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2016, 20 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [24] Do women in the Valencian Community accept self-sampling as a form of cervical cancer screening?
    Beso Delgado, Maria
    Ibanez Cabanell, Josefa
    Molina-Darcelo, Ana
    Zurriaga Llorens, Oscar
    Salas Trejo, Dolores
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2021, 95
  • [25] Mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among underserved minority women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Kobetz, Erin
    Seay, Julia
    Amofah, Anthony
    Pierre, Larry
    Bispo, Jordan Baeker
    Trevil, Dinah
    Gonzalez, Martha
    Poitevien, Martine
    Koru-Sengul, Tulay
    Carrasquillo, Olveen
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [26] Mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among underserved minority women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Erin Kobetz
    Julia Seay
    Anthony Amofah
    Larry Pierre
    Jordan Baeker Bispo
    Dinah Trevil
    Martha Gonzalez
    Martine Poitevien
    Tulay Koru-Sengul
    Olveen Carrasquillo
    Trials, 18
  • [27] Knowledge of HPV/cervical cancer and acceptability of HPV self-sampling among women living with HIV: A scoping review
    Wong, J. P. H.
    Vahabi, M.
    Miholjcic, J.
    Tan, V.
    Owino, M.
    Li, A. T. W.
    Poon, M. K. L.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : E73 - E82
  • [28] Sociodemographic Characteristics and Screening Outcomes of Women Preferring Self-Sampling in the Dutch Cervical Cancer Screening Programme: A Population-Based Study
    Aitken, Clare A.
    Inturrisi, Federica
    Kaljouw, Sylvia
    Nieboer, Daan
    Siebers, Albert G.
    Melchers, Willem J. G.
    van den Brule, Adriaan J. C.
    Molijn, Anco
    Hinrichs, John W. J.
    Niesters, Hubert G. M.
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    de Kok, Inge M. C. M.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [29] Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus-Based Cervical Cancer Screening
    Chatzistamatiou, Kimon
    Vrekoussis, Thomas
    Tsertanidou, Athena
    Moysiadis, Theodoros
    Mouchtaropoulou, Evangelia
    Pasentsis, Konstantinos
    Kitsou, Anastasia
    Moschaki, Viktoria
    Ntoula, Maria
    Zempili, Paraskevi
    Halatsi, Despina
    Truva, Theoni
    Piha, Vaia
    Agelena, Georgia
    Daponte, Alexandros
    Vanakara, Polyxeni
    Paschopoulos, Minas
    Stefos, Theodoros
    Lymberis, Vasilis
    Kontomanolis, Emmanuel N.
    Makrigiannakis, Antonis
    Deligeoroglou, Efthimios
    Panoskaltsis, Theodoros
    Adonakis, George
    Michail, George
    Stamatopoulos, Kostas
    Agorastos, Theodoros
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (11) : 1447 - 1456
  • [30] HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Ethnic Minority Women in South Florida: a Randomized Trial
    Olveen Carrasquillo
    Julia Seay
    Anthony Amofah
    Larry Pierre
    Yisel Alonzo
    Shelia McCann
    Martha Gonzalez
    Dinah Trevil
    Tulay Koru-Sengul
    Erin Kobetz
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1077 - 1083