Evaluation of the analytical and clinical performance of the Abbott Alinity m instrument for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA plasma viral load in a reference laboratory in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

被引:0
|
作者
Costa, Diego S. [1 ]
Quintana, Marcel S. B. [1 ]
Grinsztejn, Beatriz [1 ]
Veloso, Valdilea G. [1 ]
Silva, Simone C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Evandro Chagas Natl Inst Infect Dis, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Alinity m; m2000; HIV-1 viral load;
D O I
10.1093/ajcp/aqae076
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objectives We sought to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity m system (Abbott Molecular) and to compare the clinical performance of HIV-1 assays on the Alinity m and m2000 RealTime platforms (Abbott Molecular). Methods The sensitivity, precision, and accuracy of the Alinity m instrument were determined using a panel of standard samples (n = 46). The carryover effect was assessed by analyzing HIV-negative clinical samples (n = 20). Clinical performance of the Alinity m and m2000 RealTime platforms was compared using surplus HIV-positive patient plasma samples (n = 39). Results The Alinity m HIV-1 assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity, a high precision (coefficient of variation (s/(x) over bar) x 100 <= 1.5% [SD <= 0.05] logarithm to base 10 [log10] copies/mL), and partial accuracy over the quantification range. Analysis of clinical samples suggested that the Alinity m HIV-1 assay does not cause carryover effect and produced a mean bias of 0.209 log10 copies/mL (95% CI, 0.153-0.265) compared with the m2000 RealTime System. Conclusions The Alinity m instrument's performance correlated to that of the m2000 RealTime platform and showed excellent sensitivity, precision, and accuracy, despite producing overquantification not clinically relevant for disease management. Furthermore, use of the Alinity m platform can reduce turnaround time.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative evaluation of plasma and serum HIV-1 viral load measurements among HIV positive individuals, Northwest Ethiopia: Analytical cross-sectional study
    Girmay, Getu
    Alemu, Habtam
    Assefa, Muluneh
    Birhane, Nega
    Lemma, Mulualem
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (03):
  • [42] Evaluation of clinical performance and cost comparison of Bayer Diagnostics and Roche Diagnostics HIV-1 viral load testing methods.
    Elbeik, T
    Charlesbois, E
    Nassos, P
    Kahn, J
    Hecht, R
    Ng, V
    Yajko, D
    Hadley, K
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 45 (06) : A40 - A40
  • [43] Performance evaluation of the Bioneer AccuPower® HIV-1 Quantitative RT-PCR kit: Comparison with the Roche COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan® HIV-1 Test Ver.2.0 for quantification of HIV-1 viral load in Indonesia
    Kosasih, Agus Susanto
    Sugiarto, Christine
    Hayuanta, Hubertus Hosti
    Juhaendi, Runingsih
    Setiawan, Lyana
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [44] Laboratory Evaluation of the Liat HIV Quant (IQuum) Whole-Blood and Plasma HIV-1 Viral Load Assays for Point-of-Care Testing in South Africa
    Scott, Lesley
    Gous, Natasha
    Carmona, Sergio
    Stevens, Wendy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 53 (05) : 1616 - 1621
  • [45] Improving clinical laboratory efficiency: a time-motion evaluation of the Abbott m2000 RealTime and Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan PCR systems for the simultaneous quantitation of HIV-1 RNA and HCV RNA
    Amendola, Alessandra
    Coen, Sabrina
    Belladonna, Stefano
    Pulvirenti, F. Renato
    Clemens, John M.
    Capobianchi, M. Rosaria
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 49 (08) : 1283 - 1288
  • [46] Evaluation of new high-throughput platforms for the quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma to support scale-up of viral load testing in low- and middle-income countries
    Zhang, G.
    Hans, L.
    Jadczak, S.
    Sleeman, K.
    Makuwaza, L.
    Peloakgosi-Shikwambani, K.
    Cox, M. Hurlston
    Alexander, H.
    Carmona, S.
    Zeh, C.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2021, 24 : 25 - 25
  • [47] Evaluation of performance across the dynamic range of the Abbott RealTime™ HIV-1 assay as compared to VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 and AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR v1.5 using serial dilutions of 39 group M and O viruses
    Swanson, Priscilla
    Huang, Shihai
    Abravaya, Klara
    de Mendoza, Carmen
    Soriano, Vincent
    Devare, Sushil G.
    Hackett, John, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 141 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [48] Evaluation of the clinical sensitivity for the quantification of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA in plasma: Comparison of the new COBAS TaqMan HIV-1 with three current HIV-RNA assays-LCx HIV RNA quantitative, VERSANT HIV-1 RNA 3.0 (bDNA) and COBAS AMPLICOR HIV-1 Monitor v1.5
    Katsoulidou, A
    Petrodaskalaki, M
    Sypsa, V
    Papachristou, E
    Anastassopoulou, CG
    Gargalianos, P
    Karafoulidou, A
    Lazanas, M
    Kordossis, T
    Andoniadou, A
    Hatzakis, A
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 131 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [49] Clinical Validation of the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS® TaqMan® System and Dilution of Small Volume Plasma Samples for Pediatric HIV-1 RNA Viral Load Testing
    Webb, R.
    Luna, R.
    Ton, T.
    de Palacios, C. A.
    Versalovic, J.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2008, 10 (06): : 616 - 617
  • [50] Comparative performance of three viral load assays on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates representing group M (subtypes A to G) and group O: LCx HIV RNA Quantitative, AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5, and Quantiplex HIV-1 RNA version 3.0
    Swanson, P
    Soriano, V
    Devare, SG
    Hackett, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (03) : 862 - 870