Evaluation of ocean wave power utilizing COWCLIP 2.0 datasets: a CMIP5 model assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Yadav, Anshu [1 ]
Kumar, Prashant [1 ]
Bhaskaran, Prasad Kumar [2 ]
Hisaki, Yukiharu [3 ]
Rajni [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Appl Sci, Delhi, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kharagpur, Dept Ocean Engn & Naval Architecture, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
[3] Univ Ryukyus, Dept Phys & Earth Sci, Phys Oceanog Lab, Okinawa 9030213, Japan
[4] OP Jindal Global Univ, Jindal Global Business Sch, Sonipat 131001, Haryana, India
关键词
Wave power; CMIP5; models; Root mean square error; Interannual variability skill; M-Score; CLIMATE-CHANGE SIGNAL; PROJECTED CHANGES; UNCERTAINTY; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; EXTREMES; CHINA; END; ERA;
D O I
10.1007/s00382-024-07402-z
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Global Climate Models (GCMs) are very essential and crucial for projecting future climate scenarios under different greenhouse gas emissions, incorporating uncertainties in the global warming projections. The present study evaluates the seasonal performance of 32 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) models obtained from the Coordinated Ocean Wave Climate Project phase 2 (COWCLIP 2.0) in simulating the global and regional wave power (WP) from 1979 to 2004 using historical data, and comparing them against the ERA5 reanalysis. Three skill metrics, such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Interannual Variability Skill (IVS), and M-Score were used to assess the model performance across three clusters (CSIRO, JRC, and IHC). In addition, Intra-seasonal and probability distribution is also employed to determine the cluster's performance, including individual models. The IHC cluster, employing statistical techniques, exhibited the lowest RMSE and highest M-Score values with the least variation among models over the global as well as regional ocean basins such as the North Atlantic (NA), North Pacific (NP), Indian Ocean (IO), and Pacific Ocean (PO. Results from intra-seasonal variability and probability distribution indicate that the IHC cluster demonstrates the most stable performance in simulating intra-seasonal variability of WP as compared to other clusters.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:9447 / 9468
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Inconsistent strategies to spin up models in CMIP5: implications for ocean biogeochemical model performance assessment
    Seferian, Roland
    Gehlen, Marion
    Bopp, Laurent
    Resplandy, Laure
    Orr, James C.
    Marti, Olivier
    Dunne, John P.
    Christian, James R.
    Doney, Scott C.
    Ilyina, Tatiana
    Lindsay, Keith
    Halloran, Paul R.
    Heinze, Christoph
    Segschneider, Joachim
    Tjiputra, Jerry
    Aumont, Olivier
    Romanou, Anastasia
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (05) : 1827 - 1851
  • [22] Assessment of the Southern Ocean Sea Surface Temperature Biases in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    GAO Zhen
    ZHAO Shichang
    LIU Qinyu
    LONG ShangMin
    SUN Shantong
    Journal of Ocean University of China, 2024, 23 (05) : 1135 - 1150
  • [23] Evaluation of CMIP5 climate model projections for surface wind speed over the Indian Ocean region
    Soumya Mohan
    Prasad K. Bhaskaran
    Climate Dynamics, 2019, 53 : 5415 - 5435
  • [24] Connectivity between Historical Great Basin Precipitation and Pacific Ocean Variability: A CMIP5 Model Evaluation
    Smith, Kimberly
    Strong, Courtenay
    Wang, Shih-Yu
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (15) : 6096 - 6112
  • [25] Evaluation of CMIP5 climate model projections for surface wind speed over the Indian Ocean region
    Mohan, Soumya
    Bhaskaran, Prasad K.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 53 (9-10) : 5415 - 5435
  • [26] Assessment of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance for extreme temperature in China
    Luo Neng
    Guo Yan
    Gao Zhibo
    Chen Kexin
    Chou Jieming
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 589 - 597
  • [27] Changes in global ocean wave heights as projected using multimodel CMIP5 simulations
    Wang, Xiaolan L.
    Feng, Yang
    Swail, Val R.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 41 (03) : 1026 - 1034
  • [28] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Guo, Hai
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Ning, Like
    Li, Zhonghe
    Hu, Shi
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (3-4) : 1451 - 1470
  • [29] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Hai Guo
    Chesheng Zhan
    Like Ning
    Zhonghe Li
    Shi Hu
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 149 : 1451 - 1470
  • [30] Comparative assessment of future solar power potential based on CMIP5 and CMIP6 multi-model ensembles
    Ha, Subin
    Zhou, Zixuan
    Im, Eun-Soon
    Lee, Young-Mi
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 206 : 324 - 335