Morphological assessment of oocyte quality during assisted reproductive technology cycle

被引:0
|
作者
Sciorio, Romualdo [1 ]
Tramontano, Luca [2 ]
Greco, Pier Francesco [3 ]
Greco, Ermanno [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Woman Mother Child, Fertil Med & Gynaecol Endocrinol Unit, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Geneva Univ Hosp, Dept Women Infants & Adolescents, Div Obstet, Blvd Cluse 30, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Reprod Med, Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy
[4] Int Med Univ, UniCamillus, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rome, Italy
来源
关键词
medically assisted reproduction; non-invasive assessment; oocyte morphology; oocyte quality; oocyte biomechanical features; pregnancy outcomes; healthy offspring; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; POLAR BODY MORPHOLOGY; SUBSEQUENT EMBRYONIC-DEVELOPMENT; ZONA-PELLUCIDA GLYCOPROTEINS; MEIOTIC SPINDLE; IN-VITRO; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYOS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Following the advancement of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) technology, and the rationale to extend the culture to the blastocyst stage, performing and assessment have acquired large relevance in ART. Embryo quality is strictly correlated with gametes quality and culture conditions. Oocyte maturity assessment is therefore imperative for fertilization and embryo evolution. Mature oocytes at the metaphase II stage result in a higher fertilization rate compared to immature oocytes. Indeed, oocyte morphology evaluation represents an important and challenging task that may serve as a valuable prognostic tool for future embryo development and implantation potential. Different grading systems have been reported to assess human embryos, however, in many cases, it is still a major challenge to select the single embryo to transfer with the highest implantation potential. Further, eSET has conferred a challenge to embryologists, who must try to enhance embryo culture and selection to provide an adequate success rate, whilst reducing the overall number of embryos transferred. Above the standard morphological assessment, there are several invasive or non-invasive approaches for embryo selection such as preimplantation genetic testing, time-lapse technology, proteomics and metabolomics, as well as oxygen utilization and analysis of oxidative stress in culture medium. This short review is not designed to be a comprehensive review of all possible however, a brief overview and describes the prognostic value of the morphological characteristics of human oocytes on their developmental capacity following ART treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 520
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NATIONAL ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (ART) CYCLE LINKAGE.
    Luke, B.
    Brown, M. B.
    Wantman, E.
    Lederman, A.
    Gibbons, W. E.
    Stern, J. E.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) : S82 - S82
  • [22] Public reporting of assisted reproductive technology cycle outcomes is not simple
    Doody, Kevin J.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (04) : 893 - 894
  • [23] Prolonged stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: should the cycle be abandoned?
    Yulzari-Roll, V
    Yoeli, R.
    Perri, T.
    Orvieto, R.
    Kerner, R.
    Ferber, A.
    Ashkenazi, J.
    Dekel, A.
    Ben-Rafael, Z.
    Bar-Hava, I
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 : 147 - 147
  • [24] Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory
    Boone, WR
    Johnson, JE
    Locke, AJ
    Crane, MM
    Price, TM
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (01) : 150 - 154
  • [25] Gamete quality and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes
    Salas-Huetos, Albert
    Bonet, Sergi
    Ribas-Maynou, Jordi
    FRONTIERS IN CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 11
  • [26] Experience with ISO quality control in assisted reproductive technology
    Alper, Michael M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (06) : 1503 - 1508
  • [27] Introduction to Quality Management in Assisted Reproductive Technology Symposium
    Mortimer, David
    Pool, Thomas
    Cohen, Jacques
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2014, 28 (05) : 533 - 534
  • [28] Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Oocyte Donation
    Chalova, Leila
    Lokshin, Vyacheslav
    Kiyan, Vladimir
    Turdaliyeva, Botagoz
    Zhybanisheva, Karlygash
    Kinzhibayev, Arman
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 54 (03) : 607 - 614
  • [29] ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: A HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT PERSPECTIVE
    Hiller, J. E.
    Elshaug, A. G.
    Watt, A. M.
    Astute, S. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A546 - A546
  • [30] Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology
    Luke, Barbara
    Brown, Morton B.
    Stern, Judy E.
    Jindal, Sangita K.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Ball, G. David
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (05) : 1338 - 1344