Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment processes coupled with sludge in situ reduction

被引:1
|
作者
Sun, Yiyue [1 ]
Zuo, Yi [1 ]
Shao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Lihua [2 ]
Jiang, Lu-Man [1 ]
Hu, Jiaming [1 ]
Zhou, Chuanting [3 ]
Lu, Xi [4 ]
Huang, Song [4 ]
Zhou, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Elect Power, Coll Environm & Chem Engn, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Energy Saving Heat Exchange, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Chengtou Wastewater Treatment Co Ltd, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Urban Construct Design & Res Inst, Shanghai 200125, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Invest Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Shanghai 200335, Peoples R China
来源
WATER RESEARCH X | 2024年 / 24卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sludge in situ reduction (SIR); Carbon emission; Greenhouse gas (GHG); Sludge process reduction activated sludge; process (SPRAS); Anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR); SIDE-STREAM REACTOR; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; TREATMENT PLANTS; DISSOLVED-OXYGEN; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100243
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO2-eq/m3), CO2 emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO2-eq/m3), and N2O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO2-eq/m3) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a costeffective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sludge Reduction Technology for Municipal Wastewater Treatment
    Chang, Tien-chin
    Shen, Shan-mi
    SELECTED PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WASTE MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY(ICWMT 5), 2010, : 426 - 432
  • [22] Ozone treatment of wastewater sludge for reduction and stabilization
    Park, K.Y.
    Maeng, S.K.
    Song, K.G.
    Ahn, K.H.
    Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 2008, 43 (13 SPEC. ISS.): : 1546 - 1550
  • [23] Ozone treatment of wastewater sludge for reduction and stabilization
    Park, K. Y.
    Maeng, S. K.
    Song, K. G.
    Ahn, K. H.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 43 (13): : 1546 - 1550
  • [24] A graphical representation of carbon footprint reduction for chemical processes
    Tjan, Wendy
    Tan, Raymond R.
    Foo, Dominic C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (09) : 848 - 856
  • [25] Critical review of ARGs reduction behavior in various sludge and sewage treatment processes in wastewater treatment plants
    Xue, Gang
    Jiang, Mingji
    Chen, Hong
    Sun, Min
    Liu, Yunfan
    Li, Xiang
    Gao, Pin
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 49 (18) : 1623 - 1674
  • [26] A comparative evaluation of biological activated carbon and activated sludge processes for the treatment of tannery wastewater
    Tammaro, Marco
    Salluzzo, Antonio
    Perfetto, Raffaele
    Lancia, Amedeo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 2 (03) : 1445 - 1455
  • [27] In-situ sludge reduction and carbon reuse in an anoxic/oxic process coupled with hydrocyclone breakage
    Xu, Yinxiang
    Fang, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Guo, Dan
    Liu, Yi
    Huang, Yuan
    Fu, Pengbo
    Jin, Juehui
    Wei, Chenwen
    Wang, Hualin
    Zeng, Tao
    WATER RESEARCH, 2018, 141 : 135 - 144
  • [28] Carbon footprint of aerobic biological treatment of winery wastewater
    Rosso, D.
    Bolzonella, D.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (05) : 1185 - 1189
  • [29] Carbon and energy footprint of electrochemical vinegar wastewater treatment
    Gerek, Emine Esra
    Yilmaz, Seval
    Koparal, A. Savas
    Gerek, Omer Nezih
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING (ASEE17), 2017, 22
  • [30] Carbon footprint of constructed wetlands for winery wastewater treatment
    Flores, Laura
    Garcia, Joan
    Pena, Rocio
    Garfi, Marianna
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 156