Carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment processes coupled with sludge in situ reduction

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Yiyue [1 ]
Zuo, Yi [1 ]
Shao, Yanjun [1 ]
Wang, Lihua [2 ]
Jiang, Lu-Man [1 ]
Hu, Jiaming [1 ]
Zhou, Chuanting [3 ]
Lu, Xi [4 ]
Huang, Song [4 ]
Zhou, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Elect Power, Coll Environm & Chem Engn, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Energy Saving Heat Exchange, Shanghai 200090, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Chengtou Wastewater Treatment Co Ltd, Shanghai 201203, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Urban Construct Design & Res Inst, Shanghai 200125, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Invest Design & Res Inst Co Ltd, Shanghai 200335, Peoples R China
来源
WATER RESEARCH X | 2024年 / 24卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sludge in situ reduction (SIR); Carbon emission; Greenhouse gas (GHG); Sludge process reduction activated sludge; process (SPRAS); Anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR); SIDE-STREAM REACTOR; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; TREATMENT PLANTS; DISSOLVED-OXYGEN; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; TECHNOLOGIES; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2024.100243
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to assess the impacts or benefits of sludge in situ reduction (SIR) within wastewater treatment processes with relation to global warming potential in wastewater treatment plants, with a comprehensive consideration of wastewater and sludge treatment. The anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR) and the sludge process reduction activated sludge (SPRAS), two typical SIR technologies, were used to compare the carbon footprint analysis results with the conventional anaerobic - anoxic - oxic (AAO) process. Compared to the AAO, the ASSR with a typical sludge reduction efficiency (SRE) of 30 % increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 1.1 - 1.7 %, while the SPRAS with a SRE of 74 % reduced GHG emissions by 12.3 - 17.6 %. Electricity consumption (0.025 - 0.027 kg CO2-eq/m3), CO2 emissions (0.016 - 0.059 kg CO2-eq/m3), and N2O emissions (0.009 - 0.023 kg CO2-eq/m3) for the removal of secondary substrates released from sludge decay in the SIR processes were the major contributor to the increased GHG emissions from the wastewater treatment system. By lowering sludge production and the organic matter content in the sludge, the SIR processes significantly decreased the carbon footprints associated with sludge treatment and disposal. The threshold SREs of the ASSR for GHG reduction were 27.7 % and 34.6 % for the advanced dewatering - sanitary landfill and conventional dewatering - drying-incinerating routes, respectively. Overall, the SPRAS process could be considered as a costeffective and sustainable low-carbon SIR technology for wastewater treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility analysis for reduction of carbon footprint in a wastewater treatment plant
    Borzooei, Sina
    Campo, Giuseppe
    Cerutti, Alberto
    Meucci, Lorenza
    Panepinto, Deborah
    Ravina, Marco
    Riggio, Vincenzo
    Ruf, Barbara
    Scibilia, Gerardo
    Zanetti, Mariachiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271 (271)
  • [2] Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction
    Yingxin Zhao
    Zhifan Yang
    Jiaojiao Niu
    Zihan Du
    Conti Federica
    Zhe Zhu
    Kaichao Yang
    Yan Li
    Baofeng Zhao
    Thomas Helmer Pedersen
    Chunguang Liu
    Mutabazi Emmanuel
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2023, (06) : 224 - 249
  • [3] Systematical analysis of sludge treatment and disposal technologies for carbon footprint reduction
    Zhao, Yingxin
    Yang, Zhifan
    Niu, Jiaojiao
    Du, Zihan
    Federica, Conti
    Zhu, Zhe
    Yang, Kaichao
    Li, Yan
    Zhao, Baofeng
    Pedersen, Thomas Helmer
    Liu, Chunguang
    Emmanuel, Mutabazi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 128 : 224 - 249
  • [4] Comprehensive carbon footprint analysis of wastewater treatment: A case study of modified cyclic activated sludge technology for low carbon source urban wastewater treatment
    Wang, Yuting
    Gao, Wenfang
    Lv, Longyi
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Ren, Zhijun
    Sun, Li
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Wang, Pengfei
    Sun, Zhi
    Tian, Yu
    Zhang, Guangming
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 923
  • [5] Integrated treatment of food waste with wastewater and sewage sludge: Energy and carbon footprint analysis with economic implications
    Iqbal, Asad
    Zan, Feixiang
    Siddiqui, Muhammad Ahmar
    Nizamuddin, Sabzoi
    Chen, Guanghao
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 825
  • [6] Carbon footprint analysis of advanced biological wastewater treatment plant
    Karakas, Aysenur
    Tozum-Akgul, Seda
    Komesli, Okan Tarik
    Kaplan-Bekaroglu, Sehnaz Sule
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2024, 61
  • [7] Effects of soluble and particulate substrate on the carbon and energy footprint of wastewater treatment processes
    Gori, Riccardo
    Jiang, Lu-Man
    Sobhani, Reza
    Rosso, Diego
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2011, 45 (18) : 5858 - 5872
  • [8] In situ near infrared monitoring of activated dairy sludge wastewater treatment processes
    Pascoa, Ricardo N. M.
    Lopes, Joao A.
    Lima, Jose L. F. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (04) : 409 - 419
  • [9] Carbon Footprint Analyses of Mainstream Wastewater Treatment Technologies under Different Sludge Treatment Scenarios in China
    Chai, Chunyan
    Zhang, Dawei
    Yu, Yanling
    Feng, Yujie
    Wong, Man Sing
    [J]. WATER, 2015, 7 (03): : 918 - 938
  • [10] Coupled process of in-situ sludge fermentation and riboflavin-mediated nitrogen removal for low carbon wastewater treatment
    Liu, Jingya
    Huang, Jingang
    Li, Weishuai
    Shi, Zhuoer
    Lin, Yuanyuan
    Zhou, Rongbing
    Meng, Jianfang
    Tang, Junhong
    Hou, Pingzhi
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 363