Soybean Yield Simulation and Sustainability Assessment Based on the DSSAT-CROPGRO-Soybean Model

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Cao, Zhenxi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Yang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Huang, Weixiong [5 ]
Si, Zhuanyun [4 ]
Guo, Yuanhang [1 ]
Wang, Hongbo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xingpeng [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tarim Univ, Modern Agr Engn Key Lab Univ, Coll Water Hydraul & Architectural Engn, Educ Dept Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Reg, Alar 843300, Peoples R China
[2] Tarim Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Tarim Oasis Agr, Alar 843300, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Western Agr Res Ctr, Changji 831100, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Farmland Irrigat, Xinxiang 453002, Peoples R China
[5] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Hubei Key Lab Yangtze Catchment Environm Aquat Sci, Wuhan 430078, Peoples R China
[6] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Northwest Oasis Water Saving Agr, Shihezi 832000, Peoples R China
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 17期
关键词
soybean; DSSAT model; yield; biomass; irrigation water use efficiency; DRIP IRRIGATION; SOUTHERN XINJIANG; WATER; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/plants13172525
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In order to ensure national grain and oil security, it is imperative to expand the soybean planting area in the Xinjiang region. However, the scarcity of water resources in southern Xinjiang, the relatively backward soybean planting technology, and the lack of a supporting irrigation system have negatively impacted soybean planting and yield. In 2022 and 2023, we conducted an experiment which included three irrigation amounts of 27 mm, 36 mm, and 45 mm and analyzed the changes in dry mass and yield. Additionally, we simulated the potential yield using the corrected DSSAT-CROPGRO-Soybean model and biomass based on the meteorological data from 1994 to 2023. The results demonstrated that the model was capable of accurately predicting soybean emergence (the relative root mean square error (nRMSE) = 0, the absolute relative error (ARE) = 0), flowering (nRMSE = 0, ARE = 2.78%), maturity (nRMSE = 0, ARE = 3.21%). The model demonstrated high levels of accuracy in predicting soybean biomass (R-2 = 0.98, nRMSE = 20.50%, ARE = 20.63%), 0-80 cm soil water storage (R-2 = 0.64, nRMSE = 7.78%, ARE = 3.24%), and yield (R-2 = 0.81, nRMSE = 10.83%, ARE = 8.79%). The biomass of soybean plants increases with the increase in irrigation amount. The highest biomass of 63 mm is 9379.19 kg.hm(-2). When the irrigation yield is 36-45 mm (p < 0.05), the maximum yield can reach 4984.73 kg.hm(-2); the maximum efficiency of soybean irrigation water was 33-36 mm. In light of the impact of soybean yield and irrigation water use efficiency, the optimal irrigation amount for soybean cultivation in southern Xinjiang is estimated to be between 36 and 42 mm. The simulation results provide a theoretical foundation for soybean cultivation in southern Xinjiang.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model to estimate the yield for soybean
    dos Santos Gomes, Ana Carla
    Robaina, Adroaldo Dias
    Peiter, Marcia Xavier
    Soares, Fatima Cibele
    Costenaro Parizi, Ana Rita
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2014, 44 (01): : 43 - 49
  • [32] Evaluating the CROPGRO soybean model for predicting impacts of insect defoliation and depodding
    Timsina, J.
    Boote, K. J.
    Duffield, S.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (01) : 148 - 157
  • [33] Evaluation of the CROPGRO-Soybean model over a wide range of experiments
    Boote, KJ
    Jones, JW
    Hoogenboom, G
    Wilkerson, GG
    APPLICATIONS OF SYSTEMS APPROACHES AT THE FIELD LEVEL: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS APPROACHES FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, VOL 2, 1997, 6 : 113 - 133
  • [34] Predicting soybean evapotranspiration and crop water productivity for a tropical environment using the CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean model
    Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Evandro H.
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    Goncalves, Alexandre Ortega
    Marin, Fabio R.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2022, 323
  • [35] CROPGRO-soybean model - Validation and application for the southern Amazon, Brazil
    Mota, Marcelo Crestani
    Candido, Luiz Antonio
    Cuadra, Santiago Vianna
    Marenco, Ricardo Antonio
    de Souza, Rita Valeria Andreoli
    Tome, Adriano Maito
    Lopes, Andressa Back de Andrade
    de Lima, Francinei Lopes
    Reis, Juliana
    Brizolla, Rafael Morbeque
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2024, 216 : 1 - 15
  • [36] Modifying the CROPGRO-Soybean model to improve predictions for the upper Midwest
    Pedersen, P
    Boote, KJ
    Jones, JW
    Lauer, JG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (02) : 556 - 564
  • [37] Assessment of sowing dates and plant densities using CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean for soybean maturity groups in low latitude
    Sampaio, L. S.
    Battisti, R.
    Lana, M. A.
    Boote, K. J.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2020, 158 (10): : 819 - 832
  • [38] Application of the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CROPGRO-Soybean for Determining Optimum Management Strategies for Soybean in Tropical Environments
    Banterng, P.
    Hoogenboom, G.
    Patanothai, A.
    Singh, P.
    Wani, S. P.
    Pathak, P.
    Tongpoonpol, S.
    Atichart, S.
    Srihaban, P.
    Buranaviriyakul, S.
    Jintrawet, A.
    Nguyen, T. C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2010, 196 (03) : 231 - 242
  • [39] Quantitative assessment of soybean drought risk in Bengbu city based on disaster loss risk curve and DSSAT
    Wei, Yanqi
    Jin, Juliang
    Cui, Yi
    Ning, Shaowei
    Fei, Zhenyu
    Wu, Chengguo
    Zhou, Yuliang
    Zhang, Libing
    Liu, Li
    Tong, Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 56
  • [40] Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-Soybean model: Links to field performance and genomics
    Boote, KJ
    Jones, JW
    Batchelor, WD
    Nafziger, ED
    Myers, O
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (01) : 32 - 51