Enhancing the building resilience in a changing climate through a passive cooling roof: A case study in Camas (Seville, Spain)

Renovating buildings is a crucial mission for the coming decades to combat energy inefficiencies and produce a resilient building stock. The inefficient thermal envelope has significant implications for occupants, especially for families lacking the financial resources to maintain a healthy and comfortable indoor environment. In scenarios where households cannot afford or utilize HVAC systems and high temperatures are more frequent, building retrofits should prioritize reducing heat loss in winter and passively lowering indoor temperatures in the cooling season. This work introduces a new solution to enhance the liveability of a social housing building in southern Spain by integrating a double-skin roof with a conventional retrofit strategy, which incorporates passive cooling techniques - night ventilation and an evaporative cooling system - for effective heat dissipation based on available commercial solutions. An extensive monitoring campaign was conducted over three years to evaluate the thermal comfort of occupants and the risk of overheating in naturally conditioned buildings before and after renovation following two impact assessment methods: real-time data-based and simulation-based. The real-time data-based method compared the indoor conditions of a dwelling with a conventionally retrofitted roof to one with a double-skin roof, indicating that the dynamic roof maintains a ceiling temperature lower than the air temperature throughout the summer while the conventional roof acts as a heating surface. On the other side, the simulation-based method compared the observed indoor conditions with a double-skin roof enabled during 2023 to the initial stage and a double-skin roof disabled scenario, using calibrated building energy models. The natural cooling roof solution almost eliminates the overheating events, leading to a reduction of 94.1% and 76.9% in discomfort degree-hours compared to the initial stage according to the ASHRAE adaptative and Fanger comfort models, respectively. Additionally, the results indicate that conventional retrofits can increase the risk of overheating when a cooling system is not considered. Integrating a cool roof solution requires only an extra implementation cost of 31<euro>/m2 compared to a conventional solution, having an operational cost that represents less than 3% of the minimum monthly income in the social housing district.