Impact of Incentives on Physician Participation in Research Surveys: Randomized Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Hawa, Saadiya [1 ]
Bane, Shalmali [2 ]
Kinsler, Kayla [3 ]
Rector, Amadeia [2 ]
Chaichian, Yashaar [4 ]
Falasinnu, Titilola [4 ]
Simard, Julia F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Weiss Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Grad Med Educ, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Stanford Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Alway Bldg,300 Pasteur Dr,M121L,MC 5405, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI USA
[4] Stanford Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Immunol & Rheumatol, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
internet survey; incentive; physician recruitment; internet surveys; online survey; online surveys; web-based survey; web-based surveys; survey; surveys; incentives; monetary incentive; monetary incentives; physician participation; physician participant; physician participants; physician; physicians; doctor participation; doctor participant; doctor participants; doctor; doctors; neurologist; neurologists; RESPONSE RATES; PROFESSIONALS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2196/54343
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Web-based surveys can be effective data collection instruments; however, participation is notoriously low,particularly among professionals such as physicians. Few studies have explored the impact of varying amounts of monetaryincentives on survey completion. Objective: This study aims to conduct a randomized study to assess how different incentive amounts influenced surveyparticipation among neurologists in the United States. Methods: We distributed a web-based survey using standardized email text to 21,753 individuals randomly divided into 5 equalgroups (approximate to 4351 per group). In phase 1, each group was assigned to receive either nothing or a gift card for US $10, $20, $50, or$75, which was noted in the email subject and text. After 4 reminders, phase 2 began and each remaining individual was offereda US $75 gift card to complete the survey. We calculated and compared the proportions who completed the survey by phase 1arm, both before and after the incentive change, using a chi-square test. As a secondary outcome, we also looked at surveyparticipation as opposed to completion. Results: For the 20,820 emails delivered, 879 (4.2%) recipients completed the survey; of the 879 recipients, 622 (70.8%) wereneurologists. Among the neurologists, most were male (412/622, 66.2%), White (430/622, 69.1%), non-Hispanic (592/622,95.2%), graduates of American medical schools (465/622, 74.8%), and board certified (598/622, 96.1%). A total of 39.7%(247/622) completed their neurology residency more than 20 years ago, and 62.4% (388/622) practiced in an urban setting. Forphase 1, the proportions of respondents completing the survey increased as the incentive amount increased (46/4185, 1.1%;76/4165, 1.8%; 86/4160, 2.1%; 104/4162, 2.5%; and 119/4148, 2.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P<.001).In phase 2, the survey completion rate for the former US $0 arm increased to 3% (116/3928). Those originally offered US $10,$20, $50, and $75 who had not yet participated were less likely to participate compared with the former US $0 arm (116/3928,3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 74/3878, 1.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P=.03).For our secondary outcome of survey participation, a trend similar to that of survey completion was observed in phase 1 (55/4185,1.3%; 85/4165, 2%; 96/4160, 2.3%; 118/4162, 2.8%; and 135/4148, 3.3%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively;P<.001) and phase 2 (116/3928, 3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 86/3845, 2.2%, for US $0, $10, $20,$50, and $75, respectively; P=.10). Conclusions: As expected, monetary incentives can boost physician survey participation and completion, with a positive correlation between the amount offered and participation
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Impact of Modest Cash Incentives on Home Visiting Enrollment and Participation
    Jacob, Robin Tepper
    Friedman, Megan Foster
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2024, 10 (03) : 301 - 321
  • [42] PHYSICIAN PARTICIPATION IN A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL FOR OCULAR MELANOMA
    TAYLOR, KM
    ANNALS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1992, 24 (09): : 337 - 344
  • [43] Exploring the Impact of Competition and Incentives on Game Jam Participation and Behaviour
    Germaine, Niamh
    Healy, John P.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GAME JAMS, HACKATHONS AND GAME CREATION EVENTS, ICGJ 2023, 2023, : 10 - 17
  • [44] Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches
    Rahman, Sayeeda
    Majumder, Md Anwarul Azim
    Shaban, Sami F.
    Rahman, Nuzhat
    Ahmed, Moslehuddin
    Bin Abdulrahman, Khalid
    D'Souza, Urban J. A.
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE, 2011, 2 : 85 - 93
  • [45] Adolescent, parent and physician views on biomedical research participation
    Brody, JL
    Annett, RD
    Scherer, DG
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2003, 32 (02) : 122 - 122
  • [46] Material Incentives and Other Potential Factors Associated With Response Rates to Internet Surveys of American Evaluation Association Members: Findings From a Randomized Experiment
    Coryn, Chris L. S.
    Becho, Lyssa W.
    Westine, Carl D.
    Mateu, Pedro F.
    Abu-Obaid, Ruqayyah N.
    Hobson, Kristin A.
    Schroter, Daniela C.
    Dodds, Erica L.
    Vo, Anne T.
    Ramlow, Mary
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2020, 41 (02) : 277 - 296
  • [47] Impact of Financial Incentives on Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation With a Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial
    Gupta, Samir
    Miller, Stacie
    Koch, Mark
    Berry, Emily
    Anderson, Paula R.
    Pruitt, Sandi
    Borton, Eric
    Hughes, Amy E.
    Carter, Elizabeth
    Hernandez, Sylvia
    Pozos, Helen
    Halm, Ethan
    Gneezy, Ayelet
    Lieberman, Alicea
    Skinner, Celette S.
    Argenbright, Keith E.
    Balasubramanian, Bijal
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S449 - S449
  • [48] Do Students Read Teacher Evaluation Surveys when Participation Incentives are Applied? An Empirical Approach
    Matosas-Lopez, Luis
    Romero-Ania, Alberto
    Cuevas-Molano, Elena
    REICE-REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA SOBRE CALIDAD EFICACIA Y CAMBIO EN EDUCACION, 2019, 17 (03): : 99 - 124
  • [49] PHYSICIAN RESPONSIVENESS TO SURVEY INCENTIVES AND SPONSORSHIP IN PRESCRIPTION DRUG ADVERTISING RESEARCH
    Aikin, Kathryn J.
    Betts, Kevin
    Boudewyns, Vanessa
    Stine, Alexander
    Southwell, Brian
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2016, 50 : S251 - S251
  • [50] Effects of financial incentives on volunteering for clinical trials: A randomized vignette experiment
    Bickman, Leonard
    Domenico, Henry J.
    Byrne, Daniel W.
    Jerome, Rebecca N.
    Edwards, Terri L.
    Stroud, Mary
    Lebo, Laurie
    Mcguffin, Kyle
    Wilkins, Consuelo H.
    Harris, Paul A.
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 110