Impact of Incentives on Physician Participation in Research Surveys: Randomized Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Hawa, Saadiya [1 ]
Bane, Shalmali [2 ]
Kinsler, Kayla [3 ]
Rector, Amadeia [2 ]
Chaichian, Yashaar [4 ]
Falasinnu, Titilola [4 ]
Simard, Julia F. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Weiss Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Grad Med Educ, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Stanford Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Alway Bldg,300 Pasteur Dr,M121L,MC 5405, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Providence, RI USA
[4] Stanford Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Immunol & Rheumatol, Stanford, CA USA
关键词
internet survey; incentive; physician recruitment; internet surveys; online survey; online surveys; web-based survey; web-based surveys; survey; surveys; incentives; monetary incentive; monetary incentives; physician participation; physician participant; physician participants; physician; physicians; doctor participation; doctor participant; doctor participants; doctor; doctors; neurologist; neurologists; RESPONSE RATES; PROFESSIONALS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2196/54343
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Web-based surveys can be effective data collection instruments; however, participation is notoriously low,particularly among professionals such as physicians. Few studies have explored the impact of varying amounts of monetaryincentives on survey completion. Objective: This study aims to conduct a randomized study to assess how different incentive amounts influenced surveyparticipation among neurologists in the United States. Methods: We distributed a web-based survey using standardized email text to 21,753 individuals randomly divided into 5 equalgroups (approximate to 4351 per group). In phase 1, each group was assigned to receive either nothing or a gift card for US $10, $20, $50, or$75, which was noted in the email subject and text. After 4 reminders, phase 2 began and each remaining individual was offereda US $75 gift card to complete the survey. We calculated and compared the proportions who completed the survey by phase 1arm, both before and after the incentive change, using a chi-square test. As a secondary outcome, we also looked at surveyparticipation as opposed to completion. Results: For the 20,820 emails delivered, 879 (4.2%) recipients completed the survey; of the 879 recipients, 622 (70.8%) wereneurologists. Among the neurologists, most were male (412/622, 66.2%), White (430/622, 69.1%), non-Hispanic (592/622,95.2%), graduates of American medical schools (465/622, 74.8%), and board certified (598/622, 96.1%). A total of 39.7%(247/622) completed their neurology residency more than 20 years ago, and 62.4% (388/622) practiced in an urban setting. Forphase 1, the proportions of respondents completing the survey increased as the incentive amount increased (46/4185, 1.1%;76/4165, 1.8%; 86/4160, 2.1%; 104/4162, 2.5%; and 119/4148, 2.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P<.001).In phase 2, the survey completion rate for the former US $0 arm increased to 3% (116/3928). Those originally offered US $10,$20, $50, and $75 who had not yet participated were less likely to participate compared with the former US $0 arm (116/3928,3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 74/3878, 1.9%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively; P=.03).For our secondary outcome of survey participation, a trend similar to that of survey completion was observed in phase 1 (55/4185,1.3%; 85/4165, 2%; 96/4160, 2.3%; 118/4162, 2.8%; and 135/4148, 3.3%, for US $0, $10, $20, $50, and $75, respectively;P<.001) and phase 2 (116/3928, 3%; 90/3936, 2.3%; 80/3902, 2.1%; 88/3845, 2.3%; and 86/3845, 2.2%, for US $0, $10, $20,$50, and $75, respectively; P=.10). Conclusions: As expected, monetary incentives can boost physician survey participation and completion, with a positive correlation between the amount offered and participation
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physician participation in research surveys - A randomized study of inducements to return mailed research questionnaires
    Donaldson, GW
    Moinpour, CM
    Bush, NE
    Chapko, M
    Jocom, J
    Siadak, M
    Nielsen-Stoeck, M
    Bradshaw, JM
    Bichindaritz, I
    Sullivan, KM
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1999, 22 (04) : 427 - 441
  • [2] Prepaid and promised incentives in web surveys - An experiment
    Bosnjak, M
    Tuten, TL
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2003, 21 (02) : 208 - 217
  • [3] The Impact of Incentives on Physician Practices
    Jonsdottir, Una
    Asgeirsdottir, Tinna Laufey
    ICELANDIC REVIEW OF POLITICS & ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 9 (01): : 101 - 112
  • [4] Effectiveness and Ethics of Incentives for Research Participation 2 Randomized Clinical Trials
    Halpern, Scott D.
    Chowdhury, Marzana
    Bayes, Brian
    Cooney, Elizabeth
    Hitsman, Brian L.
    Schnoll, Robert A.
    Lubitz, Su Fen
    Reyes, Celine
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    Greysen, S. Ryan
    Mercede, Ashley
    Reale, Catherine
    Barg, Frances K.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Karlawish, Jason
    Stephens-Shields, Alisa J.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (11) : 1479 - 1488
  • [5] Effect of participation incentives on the composition of National Health surveys
    Moyer, Anne
    Brown, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 13 (07) : 870 - 873
  • [6] Incentives for Organizational Participation: A Recruitment Experiment in Mexico
    Palmer-Rubin, Brian
    Garay, Candelaria
    Poertner, Mathias
    COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2021, 54 (01) : 110 - 143
  • [7] INCENTIVES AND VOTER PARTICIPATION - RESEARCH NOTE
    TERCHEK, R
    POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1979, 94 (01) : 135 - 139
  • [8] The tea bag experiment: more evidence on incentives in mail surveys
    Gendall, P
    Hoek, J
    Brennan, M
    JOURNAL OF THE MARKET RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1998, 40 (04): : 347 - 351
  • [9] Conducting physician mail surveys on a limited budget - A randomized trial comparing $2 bill versus $5 bill incentives
    Asch, DA
    Christakis, NA
    Ubel, PA
    MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) : 95 - 99
  • [10] Impact of Prepaid Incentives in Face-to-Face Surveys: A Large-Scale Experiment with Postage Stamps
    Wetzels, Willem
    Schmeets, Hans
    van den Brakel, Jan
    Feskens, Remco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2008, 20 (04) : 507 - 516