Optimal tibial tunnel angulation for anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using transtibial technique

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Ling [1 ]
Xu, Junjie [2 ]
Wang, Cong [3 ,4 ]
Luo, Ye [1 ]
Tsai, Tsung-Yuan [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Jinzhong [2 ]
Wang, Shaobai [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Sport, Sch Exercise & Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Sports Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] TaoImage Med Technol Corp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Anatomical reconstruction; Transtibial; Tunnel angulation; Graft length; PLACEMENT; POSITION; ANGLE; DEFICIENCY; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104190
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Numerous studies have suggested that the primary cause of failure in transtibial anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often attributed to non-anatomical placement of the bone tunnels, typically resulting from improper tibial guidance. We aimed to establish the optimal tibial tunnel angle for anatomical ACLR by adapting the transtibial (TT) technique. Additionally, we aimed to assess graft bending angle (GBA) and length changes during in vivo dynamic flexion of the knee. Twenty knee joints underwent a CT scan and dual fluoroscopic imaging system (DFIS) to reproduce relative knee position during dynamic flexion. For the single-legged lunge, subjects began in a natural standing position and flexed the right knee beyond 90 degrees When performing the lunge task, the subject supported the body weight on the right leg, while the left leg was used to keep the balance. The tibial and femoral tunnels were established on each knee using a modified TT technique for single-bundle ACLR. The tibial tunnel angulation to the tibial axis and the sagittal plane were measured. Considering that ACL injuries tend to occur at low knee flexion angles, GBA and graft length were measured between 0 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion in this study. The tibial tunnel angulated the sagittal plane at 42.8 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees, and angulated the tibial axis at 45.3 degrees +/- 5.1 degrees The GBA was 0 degrees at 90 degrees flexion of the knee and increased substantially to 76.4 +/- 5.5 degrees at 0 degrees flexion. The GBA significantly increased with the knee extending from 90 degrees to 0 degrees (p < 0.001). The ACL length was 30.2mm +/- 3.0 mm at 0 degrees flexion and decreased to 27.5mm +/- 2.8 mm at 90 degrees flexion (p = 0.072). To achieve anatomic single-bundle ACLR, the optimal tibial tunnel should be angulated at approximately 43 degrees to the sagittal plane and approximately 45 degrees to the tibial axis using the modified TT technique. What's more, anatomical TT ACLR resulted in comparable GBA and a relatively constant ACL length from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion. These findings provide theoretical support for the clinical application and the promotion of the current modified TT technique with the assistance of a robot to achieve anatomical ACLR.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anatomical Graft Passage in Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bioabsorbable Tibial Cross Pin Fixation
    Ahn, Jin Hwan
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Chang, Moon Jong
    Kum, Dong Ho
    Kim, Young Hwan
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 32 (02) : 96 - 99
  • [42] Avoiding Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Roof Impingement With Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Keys to Correct Tunnel Placement
    Matsumoto, Akio
    Howell, Stephen M.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [43] Oval femoral tunnel technique is superior to the conventional round femoral tunnel technique using the hamstring tendon in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wen, Zhenxing
    Zhang, Hua
    Yan, Wenlong
    Mohamed, Sheikh Ibrahimrashid
    Zhao, Pei
    Huang, Xiao
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhou, Aiguo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (07) : 2245 - 2254
  • [44] Transtibial tubercle fixation without hardware for anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A new technique
    Pasque, CB
    de la Garza, S
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2004, 20 (06): : 164 - 170
  • [45] Tips for Successful Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Haro, Marc S.
    Riff, Andy
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (05) : 331 - 341
  • [46] Anatomical tibial tunnel placement. Double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with an aiming mechanism
    Petersen, W.
    Zantop, T.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2009, 22 (03) : 241 - 244
  • [47] Oval femoral tunnel technique is superior to the conventional round femoral tunnel technique using the hamstring tendon in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Zhenxing Wen
    Hua Zhang
    Wenlong Yan
    Sheikh Ibrahimrashid Mohamed
    Pei Zhao
    Xiao Huang
    Jian Zhang
    Aiguo Zhou
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020, 28 : 2245 - 2254
  • [48] Biomechanical comparison of proximal, distal, and anatomic tibial tunnel for transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Teng, Yuanjun
    Jia, Gengxin
    Lu, Fan
    Da, Lijun
    Teng, Fei
    Zhao, Lianggong
    Geng, Bin
    Yun, Xiangdong
    Han, Hua
    Xia, Yayi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2023, 237 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [49] High incidence of tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial femoral tunnel placement
    Nebelung, Sven
    Deitmer, Gregor
    Gebing, Rolf
    Reichwein, Frank
    Nebelung, Wolfgang
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (11) : 1653 - 1663
  • [50] Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Joon Ho Wang
    Jae Gyoon Kim
    Do Kyung Lee
    Hong Chul Lim
    Jin Hwan Ahn
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 1584 - 1593