Defining non-inferiority margins in randomised controlled surgical trials: a protocol for a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Kuemmerli, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Gallagher, Iain J. [3 ]
Skipworth, Richard [4 ]
Laird, Barry [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Med Sch, Mol Genet & Populat Hlth Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Univ Digest Hlth Care Ctr, Dept Surg, Clarunis, Basel, Switzerland
[3] Edinburgh Napier Univ, Ctr Biomed & Global Hlth, Edinburgh, Scotland
[4] Royal Infirm Edinburgh NHS Trust, Dept Gen Surg, Edinburgh, Scotland
[5] Edinburgh Canc Res Ctr, European Palliat Care Res Ctr, Edinburgh, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 08期
关键词
randomized controlled trial; systematic review; research design; surgery; PROPORTIONS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089587
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The reporting of randomised controlled non-inferiority (NI) drug trials is poor with less than 50% of published trials reporting a justification of the NI margin. This is despite the introduction of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension on reporting of NI and equivalence in randomised trials. It is critical to set the appropriate NI margin as this choice dictates the conclusions of the trial. Methods to estimate the margin are heterogeneous but generally based on clinical judgement and statistical reasoning, and hence tailored to each clinical situation. Yet an appraisal of NI in clinical trials has not been undertaken. Therefore the aim of this systematic review is to assess the reporting and methodological quality of defining the NI margin. Surgical NI trials have been chosen as our prototype to assess this.Methods We will conduct a systematic review of published randomised controlled trials in abdominal surgery that use an NI design. Key eligibility criteria will be: surgical intervention in at least one trial arm; adult patients and a sample size of 100 or more. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched from inception until the date of the search. Identified studies will be assessed for reporting according to the CONSORT recommendations. The outcomes are the description of the methods for defining the NI margin, and the robustness of the NI margin estimation. The latter will be based on simulations using alternative assumptions for model parameters. The results of the simulation will be compared with the trial authors' conclusions.Anticipated results The review will describe and appraise the design and reporting of surgical NI trials including shortcomings thereof and allow a comparison with pharmaceutical trials. These findings will inform researchers on the appropriate design and pitfalls when conducting surgical randomised controlled trials with an NI design and promote thorough and standardised reporting of study findings.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required and any changes to the protocol will be communicated via the registration platform. The final manuscript will be submitted to a journal for publication and the findings will be disseminated through conference presentations to inform researchers and the public.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methodological and reporting quality of non-inferiority randomized controlled trials comparing antifungal therapies: a systematic review
    Komorowski, Adam S.
    Bai, Anthony D.
    Cvetkovic, Anna
    Mourad, Omar
    Lo, Carson K. L.
    Li, Xena X.
    Mokashi, Vaibhav
    Findlater, Aidan
    Duncan, D. Brody
    Fuller, Charlotte
    Yamamura, Deborah
    Mertz, Dominik
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2022, 28 (05) : 640 - 648
  • [22] IS THERE A CONSENSUS REGARDING CLINICALLY RELEVANT NON-INFERIORITY MARGINS USED FOR KEY ONCOLOGY ENDPOINTS IN NON-INFERIORITY ONCOLOGY TRIALS?
    Hashim, M.
    He, J.
    Hu, P.
    Soikkeli, F.
    Gebregergish, S.
    Heeg, B.
    Lam, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S228 - S228
  • [23] Comparing vaccines: A systematic review of the use of the non-inferiority margin in vaccine trials
    Donken, R.
    de Melker, H. E.
    Rots, N. Y.
    Berbers, G.
    Knol, M. J.
    VACCINE, 2015, 33 (12) : 1426 - 1432
  • [24] Non-inferiority trials: are they inferior? A systematic review of reporting in major medical journals
    Rehal, Sunita
    Morris, Tim P.
    Fielding, Katherine
    Carpenter, James R.
    Phillips, Patrick P. J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [25] ENSURING SUPERIOR REPORTING OF NON-INFERIORITY RADIOTHERAPY CLINICAL TRIALS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Arifin, Andrew
    Tan, Vivian
    Yan, Michael
    Boldt, R. Gabriel
    Warner, Andrew
    Rodrigues, George
    Palma, David
    Louie, Alexander
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 174 : S30 - S31
  • [26] A note on the determination of non-inferiority margins with application in oncology clinical trials
    Yu, Binbing
    Yang, Harry
    Sabin, Antony
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 16
  • [27] Ensuring Superior Reporting of Non-Inferiority Radiotherapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
    Arifin, A. J.
    Tan, V.
    Yan, M.
    Warner, A.
    Boldt, G.
    Rodrigues, G.
    Palma, D. A.
    Louie, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E328 - E329
  • [28] RE: A NOTE ON NON-INFERIORITY MARGINS
    Al Deeb, Mohammad
    Azad, Aftab
    Barbic, David
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 17 (03) : 239 - 239
  • [29] Non-inferiority trials in breast and non-small cell lung cancer: Choice of non-inferiority margins and other statistical aspects
    Saad, Everardo D.
    Buyse, Marc
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2012, 51 (07) : 890 - 896
  • [30] Non-inferiority and equivalence trials
    Ranstam, J.
    Cook, J. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (11) : 1578 - 1579