Identifying Factors Predicting Margin Status After Mastectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Woeste, Matthew R. [1 ]
Jacob, Kevin [1 ]
Shindorf, Mackenzie [1 ]
Gaskins, Jeremy T. [2 ]
Peters, Matthew G. [1 ]
Holland, Michelle [1 ]
Donaldson, Marilyn [1 ]
McMasters, Kelly M. [1 ]
Ajkay, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Hiram C Polk Jr MD Dept Surg, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Bioinformat & Biostat, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Margins; Mastectomy; BREAST-CANCER; LOCAL RECURRENCE; RECONSTRUCTION; IMPACT; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; TRENDS; RISK;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-024-16221-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction A positive margin after mastectomy increases the risk of breast cancer recurrence and the morbidity associated with re-excision or chest wall irradiation. This study aimed to identify factors that may predict margin status after mastectomy. Methods Women with Tis-T3 breast cancers who underwent mastectomy from 2014 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Comparisons of clinicopathologic data were made between patients with negative margins (> 1 mm) and close (<= 1 mm) or positive margins. Results Of 938 women who underwent mastectomy, negative margins were reported for 794 (85%) women, while 144 (15%) women experienced close (97/144, 10%) or positive (47/144, 5%) margins. Re-excision of margins was performed in 37 (26%) of those patients, and 9 (24%) had residual cancer after re-excision. On multivariate analysis, increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-0.99, p = 0.002), increased body mass index (BMI; OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.00, p = 0.049), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC; OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.79, p = 0.006) decreased the risk of close or positive margins. Tumors located in the lower inner quadrant (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.90-7.72, p < 0.001), multifocal tumors (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.19-2.66, p = 0.005), immediate reconstruction (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.03-2.58, p = 0.039), and a preoperative tumor to breast volume ratio > 4.14 (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.43-4.94, p = 0.002) significantly increased the risk of close or positive margins. Conclusions Age, BMI, tumor location, multifocality, NAC, immediate reconstruction, and tumor to breast volume ratio independently predicted margin status after mastectomy. These data should be considered when counseling women considering mastectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:8882 / 8890
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PREOPERATIVE PREDICTING FACTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN AT THE APEX AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: USEFULNESS OF MRI
    Kim, Wansuk
    Kim, Jongwon
    Park, Sejun
    Choi, Daeheon
    Song, Cheryn
    Ahn, Hanjong
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04): : E657 - E657
  • [22] The value of transperineal apical prostate biopsy in predicting urethral/apical margin status after radical prostatectomy
    Dai, Jindong
    Zhang, Xingming
    Zhao, Jinge
    Sun, Guangxi
    Chen, Junru
    Liu, Jiandong
    Tao, Ronggui
    Zeng, Hao
    Shen, Pengfei
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (43)
  • [23] Risk factors for pain after mastectomy/lumpectomy
    Carpenter, JS
    Sloan, P
    Andrykowski, MA
    McGrath, P
    Sloan, D
    Rexford, T
    Kenady, D
    CANCER PRACTICE, 1999, 7 (02) : 66 - 70
  • [24] Does breast cancer subtype impact margin status in patients undergoing partial mastectomy?
    Fenton, Andrew
    Dupont, Elisabeth
    Tsangaris, Theodore
    Garcia-Cantu, Carlos
    Howard-McNatt, Marissa
    Chiba, Akiko
    Berger, Adam
    Levine, Edward
    Gass, Jennifer
    Gallagher, Kristalyn
    Lum, Sharon
    Martinez, Ricardo
    Willis, Alliric
    Pandya, Sonali
    Brown, Eric
    Mendiola, Amanda
    Murray, Mary
    Solomon, Naveenraj
    Senthil, Maheswari
    Ollila, David
    Edmonson, David
    Lazar, Melissa
    Namm, Jukes
    Li, Fangyong
    Butler, Meghan
    McGowan, Noreen
    Herrera, Maria
    Avitan, Yoana
    Yoder, Brian
    Walters, Laura
    McPartland, Tara
    Haddad, Victor
    Ma, Hongwei
    Xie, Ming
    Chagpar, Anees
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [25] Does Breast Cancer Subtype Impact Margin Status in Patients Undergoing Partial Mastectomy?
    Horattas, Ileana
    Fenton, Andrew
    Gabra, Joseph
    Mendiola, Amanda
    Li, Fanyong
    Namm, Jukes
    Solomon, Naveenraj
    Gass, Jennifer
    Lum, Sharon
    Murray, Mary
    Howard-McNatt, Melissa
    Dupont, Elisabeth
    Levine, Edward
    Brown, Eric
    Ollila, David
    Chiba, Akiko
    Chagpar, Anees B.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (07) : 1607 - 1612
  • [26] Health factors among women after mastectomy
    Pacian, Anna
    Kulik, Teresa Bernadetta
    Skorzynska, Hanna
    Chrusciel, Pawel
    Stefanowicz, Agata
    Dabrowska, Agnieszka
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2013, 12 (05): : 392 - 398
  • [27] Psychological and endocrine factors and pain after mastectomy
    Nishimura, D.
    Kosugi, S.
    Onishi, Y.
    Ihara, N.
    Wakaizumi, K.
    Nagata, H.
    Yamada, T.
    Suzuki, T.
    Hashiguchi, S.
    Morisaki, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 21 (07) : 1144 - 1153
  • [28] Prognostic Factors for Local Control After Breast Conservation: Does Margin Status Still Matter?
    MacDonald, Shannon
    Taghian, Alphonse G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (30) : 4929 - 4030
  • [29] A positive margin is not always an indication for radiotherapy after mastectomy in early breast cancer
    Truong, PT
    Olivotto, IA
    Speers, CH
    Wai, ES
    Berthelet, E
    Kader, HA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (03): : 797 - 804
  • [30] Pancreatectomy After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy: Identifying Factors Predicting Long-Term Survival
    Addeo, Pietro
    Averous, Gerlinde
    de Mathelin, Pierre
    Faitot, Francois
    Cusumano, Caterina
    Paul, Chloe
    Dufour, Patrick
    Bachellier, Philippe
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (05) : 1253 - 1262