Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel orphan drugs between 2017 and 2023

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Qu, Ruoxuan [3 ]
Luo, Xingxian [4 ]
Yang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Med Prod Adm, Key Lab Innovat Drug Res & Evaluat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Shenyang Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ, Peoples Hosp, Dept Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rare disease; orphan drugs; pivotal efficacy trial; clinical trial evidence; substantial evidence of effectiveness; RARE DISEASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.drudis.2024.104102
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Characterization analysis of 87 pivotal clinical trials for 72 novel orphan drugs (76 orphan indications) approved by the FDA from 2017 to 2023 revealed that the clinical trial evidence supporting FDA orphan drug approvals often lacked high-quality designs, which frequently did not incorporate randomization, blinding, placebo or no treatment control, or clinical endpoint-driven methodologies. Additionally, regulatory flexibility was observed in the quantity of clinical trial evidence required, which included choices such as a single trial plus confirmatory evidence, one large multicenter trial or at least two trials. Furthermore, the overall strength of the clinical trial evidence exhibited variations across different orphan drugs and indications, influenced by features such as the therapeutic area and whether the orphan drug was granted accelerated approvals.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HUMAN RADIOLABELED MASS BALANCE STUDIES SUPPORTING NEW DRUGS APPROVAL BY THE FDA BETWEEN 2019 TO JUNE 2022
    Ramamoorthy, A.
    Chen, A.
    Chow, E.
    Jean, D.
    Pahwa, S.
    Ren, Y.
    Shukla, C.
    Doddapaneni, S.
    Danielsen, Z. Yan
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 113 : S76 - S76
  • [32] Evaluating the evidence behind the surrogate measures included in the FDA's table of surrogate endpoints as supporting approval of cancer drugs
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Hey, Spencer P.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2020, 21
  • [33] DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN FDA APPROVAL AND CMS COVERAGE FOR DRUGS AND DEVICES
    Chambers, J. D.
    Neumann, P. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A3 - A3
  • [34] Sustain™ dental implant FDA premarket approval clinical trial
    Olin, PS
    Swift, JQ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 711 - 711
  • [35] Evaluating the Racial Distribution of Clinical Trial Participants for Drugs Leading to FDA Approval of Novel Biologics for the Treatment of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)
    Matthew-Onabanjo, A.
    Bjurlin, M.
    Rogers, M.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [36] Characteristics of Clinical Trials to Support Approval of Orphan vs Nonorphan Drugs for Cancer
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    Myers, Jessica A.
    Avorn, Jerry
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 305 (22): : 2320 - 2326
  • [37] Flexibility and innovation in the FDA's novel regulatory approval strategies for hematologic drugs (vol 130, pg 1285, 2017)
    Farrell, A. T.
    Goldberg, K. B.
    Pazdur, R.
    BLOOD, 2018, 131 (16) : 1875 - 1876
  • [38] Magnitude of clinical benefit of trials supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of breakthrough and non-breakthrough drugs
    Molto Valiente, C.
    Borrell, M.
    Hwang, T.
    Gich Saladich, I.
    Barnadas, A.
    Amir, E.
    Kesselheim, A.
    Tibau, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [39] Drugs with FDA accelerated approval often have weak evidence, study finds
    Dyer, Owen
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 357
  • [40] Use of Real-World Evidence to Support FDA Approval of Oncology Drugs
    Feinberg, Bruce A.
    Gajra, Ajeet
    Zettler, Marjorie E.
    Phillips, Todd D.
    Phillips, Eli G., Jr.
    Kish, Jonathan K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (10) : 1358 - 1365