Sexual Desire is not Partner-Specific

被引:0
|
作者
Peters, Sierra D. [1 ]
Maner, Jon K. [1 ]
Meltzer, Andrea L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida State Univ, Dept Psychol, 1107 W Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Sexual desire; Romantic relationships; Human mating; Evolutionary psychology; ROMANTIC LOVE; ATTRACTIVE ALTERNATIVES; HORMONAL PREDICTORS; IN-PAIR; SATISFACTION; COMMITMENT; FANTASIES; SOCIOSEXUALITY; PERSPECTIVES; ASSOCIATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12110-024-09478-2
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
One longitudinal study of married couples and one experiment tested the hypothesis that the experience of sexual desire for an alternative sexual partner might heighten feelings of desire for one's long-term romantic partner, and conversely, sexual desire for one's long-term partner might heighten desire for alternative partners. A daily-diary study of newlywed couples revealed that (a) on days people reported heightened interest in alternative partners, they also reported increased desire to have sex with their partner and (b) on days people reported heightened desire to have sex with their partner, they also reported increased interest in alternative partners. An experimental study of partnered individuals revealed that people primed with sexual desire for an alternative partner reported increased sexual desire for their romantic partner (relative to a control condition). People primed with sexual desire for their romantic partner, however, did not report increased sexual desire for alternatives. Taken together, these findings support evolutionary perspectives on the function of sexual desire. Findings are consistent with the broader hypothesis that sexual desire is not partner-specific.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Partner-specific behavior in social networks: Coordination among actors with heterogeneous preferences
    van Gerwen, Nikki
    Buskens, Vincent
    SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2018, 52 : 68 - 80
  • [42] Improving predictions of condom behavioral intentions with partner-specific measures of risk perception
    Ellen, JM
    Adler, N
    Gurvey, JE
    Dunlop, MBV
    Millstein, SG
    Tschann, J
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 32 (03) : 648 - 663
  • [43] Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment
    Jung, Yong
    EL-Manzalawy, Yasser
    Dobbs, Drena
    Honavar, Vasant G.
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 87 (03) : 198 - 211
  • [44] PARTNER-SPECIFIC CONDOM ATTITUDES PREDICT CONDOM USE WITH STEADY AND CASUAL PARTNERS
    Senn, Theresa E.
    Scott-Sheldon, Lori
    Carey, Michael P.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 47 : S259 - S259
  • [45] What's in a Manner of Speaking? Children's Sensitivity to Partner-Specific Referential Precedents
    Matthews, Danielle
    Lieven, Elena
    Tomasello, Michael
    DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (04) : 749 - 760
  • [46] The Influence of Partner-Specific Memory Associations on Picture Naming: A Failure to Replicate Horton (2007)
    Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
    Horton, William S.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [47] Predictors of Sexual Assertiveness: The Role of Sexual Desire, Arousal, Attitudes, and Partner Abuse
    Pablo Santos-Iglesias
    Juan Carlos Sierra
    Pablo Vallejo-Medina
    Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2013, 42 : 1043 - 1052
  • [48] Predictors of Sexual Assertiveness: The Role of Sexual Desire, Arousal, Attitudes, and Partner Abuse
    Santos-Iglesias, Pablo
    Carlos Sierra, Juan
    Vallejo-Medina, Pablo
    ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 42 (06) : 1043 - 1052
  • [49] Correlates of partner-specific condom use intentions among incarcerated women in Rhode Island
    Rosengard, C
    Clarke, JG
    DaSilva, K
    Hebert, M
    Rose, J
    Stein, MD
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2005, 37 (01) : 32 - 38
  • [50] Intimately Connected: The Importance of Partner Responsiveness for Experiencing Sexual Desire
    Birnbaum, Gurit E.
    Reis, Harry T.
    Mizrahi, Moran
    Kanat-Maymon, Yaniv
    Sass, Omri
    Granovski-Milner, Chen
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 111 (04) : 530 - 546