Evolution of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Donor Nephrectomy and Outcomes

被引:3
|
作者
Olakkengil, Santosh A. [1 ]
Mininvsu, M. [1 ]
Rao, M. Mohan [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Surg, Renal Unit, Woodville, SA 5011, Australia
关键词
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Laparoscopy; Renal transplantation; Single port; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.4293/108680811X13071180406637
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy was introduced into Australia in 1997 by this unit. However, some donors may be considered unsuitable, and few modifications to the existing technique can tailor this procedure for an individual donor. Recently, further changes including clustering of ports and single-port methods have been investigated. Methods: The laparoscopic method was offered to all but 3 donors from May 1997 to October 2009. Data were collected on all 289 donors who underwent laparoscopic procedures. Results: All but 5 donor procedures were completed laparoscopically, and in 4 of them conversion to open was necessary due to hemorrhage. The fifth was a planned conversion in our first right LDN. Delayed graft function was seen in 7 recipients and 5 required dialysis postoperatively. Two kidneys were lost due to arterial thrombosis, and 5 patients underwent segmental infarction with decreased renal function. Mean hospital stay was 2.35 +/- 1.67 days. There were no donor deaths or serious morbidity. Conclusions: Although the benefits to the donor of the laparoscopic method are well recognized, our modifications will benefit those who may be precluded from this method.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 212
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Partial nephrectomy: Alive and well in an era of minimally invasive surgery
    Broughton, Gregory J.
    Chang, Sam S.
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 412 - 413
  • [32] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: When minimally invasive surgery may be too invasive
    Sam S. Chang
    Current Urology Reports, 2003, 4 (5) : 335 - 336
  • [33] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Evolution and Technique of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
    Toshitaka Hoppo
    Blair A. Jobe
    John G. Hunter
    World Journal of Surgery, 2011, 35 : 1454 - 1463
  • [34] Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Evolution and Technique of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Esophageal Cancer
    Hoppo, Toshitaka
    Jobe, Blair A.
    Hunter, John G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 35 (07) : 1454 - 1463
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Nephrectomy: The Influence of Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery on Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Morbidity
    Mir, Saad A.
    Best, Sara L.
    Donnally, Chester J., III
    Gurbuz, Cenk
    Tracy, Chad R.
    Raman, Jay D.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    UROLOGY, 2011, 77 (03) : 631 - 634
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) in simple nephrectomy - differences in perioperative outcomes based on infectious or noninfectious aetiology
    Papadopoulou, A.
    Campain, N.
    Abu-Ghanem, Y.
    Mumtaz, F.
    Barod, R.
    Tran, M.
    Bex, A.
    Patki, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S244 - S244
  • [37] Evolution of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in Thailand
    Treepongkaruna, Sa-Ard
    ANNALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2018, 3
  • [38] Minimally invasive surgery: The evolution of fellowship - Discussion
    Soper, Nathaniel
    Kavic, S. M.
    Fried, Gerald M.
    Brunt, L. Michael
    Malangoni, Mark A.
    Larson, Gerald M.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    Wade, Terence P.
    SURGERY, 2007, 142 (04) : 511 - 513
  • [39] Surgical Evolution: Development of Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Rosenberg, Aaron G.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 16 (02) : 84 - 86
  • [40] Evolution of minimally invasive bariatric surgery - Discussion
    Schauer, PR
    Printen, KJ
    Stellato, TA
    Deitel, M
    Gould
    SURGERY, 2002, 132 (04) : 571 - 572