Assessing the sustainability of modified biosand filters using life cycle assessment, cost and performance factors

被引:0
|
作者
Eniola, Jamiu O. [1 ]
Sizirici, Banu [1 ]
机构
[1] Khalifa Univ Sci & Technol, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, POB 127788, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Biosand filter; Life cycle assessment; Cost; Biochar; Iron oxide coated gravel; Water treatment; OXIDE-COATED GRAVEL; AGGREGATE PRODUCTION; IMPROVEMENT; BIOMASS; SYSTEMS; SAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-05297-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biosand filter is being used as a low-cost, point-of-use, drinking water treatment technique globally. However, due to the limitations of biosand filter in achieving complete decontamination of drinking water, modification of the biosand filters were proposed which have increased the environmental burden of filter production. This study aims to compare the environmental impact, cost, and performance of the biosand filter (BSF), the physically modified biosand filter with biochar addition (MBSF biochar), and the chemically modified biosand filter (MBSF) by coating the gravel with iron oxide (MBSF IOCG). Life cycle assessment was modeled using the SimaPro version 9.1.17. It was found that natural aggregate extraction has the most impact on BSF and MBSFs fabrication. The total environmental impact of filters were; MBSF IOCG (675.8898 pt), > MBSF biochar (674.9818 pt), > BSF (672.5751 pt). Modification of the BSFs increased the cost and environmental burden of MBSF production. When the modification process in the MBSFs was compared, it was found that the production of biochar was less environmentally friendly (3.34 pt) than the Iron oxide coating of Gravel (IOCG) (3.14 pt). The estimated cost of constructing the filters was; MBSF (IOCG) ($ 37.28) > MBSF (Biochar) ($ 20.99) > BSF ($ 18.49). Although modifications increased the cost and environmental impact of filters, the performance of filters slightly increased for the removal of the tested pollutants. For instance, MBSF (IOCG) showed a removal percentage of 99.27% for Cu, 99.1% for Zn, 95.28% for Fe, 98.6% for Ni, and 95.33% for total coliform. On the other hand, MBSF (biochar) showed 99.2% for Cu, 99% for Zn, 78% for Fe, 75.4% for Ni, and 92.8% for Total coliform removals while the BSF gave a removal percentage of 99% for Cu, 90% for Zn, 60.1% for Fe, 73% for Ni and 93.89% for Total coliform. Accordingly, recommendations were proposed for a more sustainable BSF and its modification to achieve a high treatment efficiency of drinking water.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the sustainability of a manufacturing process using life cycle assessment technique-a case of an Indian pharmaceutical company
    Sharma, Rachit Kumar
    Sarkar, Prabir
    Singh, Harpreet
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (06) : 1269 - 1284
  • [22] Environmental sustainability assessment of hydropower plant in Europe using life cycle assessment
    Mahmud, M. A. P.
    Huda, N.
    Farjana, S. H.
    Lang, C.
    2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY ENGINEERING (ICRE 2017), 2018, 351
  • [23] Life Cycle Assessment and sustainability methodologies for assessing industrial crops, processes and end products
    Black, M. J.
    Whittaker, C.
    Hosseini, S. A.
    Diaz-Chavez, R.
    Woods, J.
    Murphy, R. J.
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2011, 34 (02) : 1332 - 1339
  • [24] Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: Aggregated sustainability indices
    Kamali, Mohammad
    Hewage, Kasun
    Milani, Abbas S.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 138 : 21 - 41
  • [25] Rethinking Wastewater-Treatment Infrastructure: Case Study Using Life-Cycle Cost and Life-Cycle Assessment to Highlight Sustainability Considerations
    Glick, Scott
    Guggemos, Angela Acree
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (12)
  • [26] Long-term performance evaluation of biosand filters modified with zero-valent iron
    Ahammed, M. Mansoor
    Solanki, Chaitali
    Nair, Abhilash T.
    PROGRESS IN SLOW SAND AND ALTERNATIVE BIOFILTRATION PROCESSES: FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, : 359 - 365
  • [27] Letter to the Editor – Life cycle sustainability assessment without a life cycle?
    Reinout Heijungs
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2023, 195
  • [28] Letter to the Editor - Life cycle sustainability assessment without a life cycle?
    Heijungs, Reinout
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2023, 195 (10)
  • [29] Building sustainability assessment model based on life cycle cost analysis and BIM technology
    Lei, Y.
    Dong, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 21 (04) : 4089 - 4100
  • [30] BIM-Enabled Virtual Reality (VR) for Sustainability Life Cycle and Cost Assessment
    Kamari, Aliakbar
    Paari, Ashwin
    Torvund, Henrik Oien
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 24