Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an alternative to radiofrequency ablation for single HCC ≤5.0 cm

被引:2
|
作者
Yang, Zhoutian [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shiliang [1 ,3 ]
Hu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jinbin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Juncheng [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Yangxun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Mengzhong [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Minshan [1 ,2 ]
Xi, Mian [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yaojun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Canc, Guangzhou 510060, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Liver Surg, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng East Rd, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
hepatocellular carcinoma; stereotactic body radiation therapy; radiofrequency ablation; local recurrence; distant recurrence; survival; adverse events; subsequent treatments; RECURRENT HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIATION-THERAPY; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; CIRRHOTIC-PATIENTS; EFFICACY; TRIAL; PROGNOSIS; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101151
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Radiation therapy has been refined with increasing evidence of the benefits of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate whether SBRT could serve as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small HCC with a single lesion <= 5.0 cm. Methods: Patients with a single HCC lesion <= 5.0 cm who received RFA or SBRT were included. Cumulative local/distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, adverse events and subsequent treatments after recurrence were analyzed. Results: A total of 288 patients receiving RFA (n =166) or SBRT (n = 122) were enrolled. The baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. The cumulative local recurrence rate in the SBRT group was significantly lower than that in the RFA group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57, p <0.001), especially for patients with tumours >2.0 cm (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.50, p <0.001) or adjacent to major vessels (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.66, p <0.001). Cumulative distant recurrence rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two groups (all p >0.050). Adverse events were mild and easily reversible. However, more patients in the SBRT group suffered from Child-Pugh score and total bilirubin increases. More treatment options after recurrence or progression might be available for patients in the RFA group compared to those in the SBRT group (p <0.001). Conclusions: Both RFA and SBRT were effective and safe for HCC with a single lesion <= 5.0 cm. SBRT could be an alternative treatment to RFA, especially for tumours >2.0 cm or adjacent to major vessels. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation very early-stage HCC (≤2 cm Single HCC): A propensity score analysis
    Chu, Hee Ho
    Kim, Jin Hyoung
    Kim, Pyo Nyun
    Kim, So Yeon
    Lim, Young-Suk
    Park, Seong Ho
    Ko, Heung-Kyu
    Lee, Sung-Gyu
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 39 (12) : 2397 - 2407
  • [23] Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Lei
    Ke, Qiao
    Huang, Qizhen
    Shao, Lingdong
    Chen, Juhui
    Wu, Junxin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2020, 37 (01) : 1313 - 1321
  • [24] Outcomes of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
    Bujold, A.
    Massey, C.
    Kim, J. J.
    Brierley, J. D.
    Cho, C.
    Wong, R.
    Dinniwell, R. E.
    Knox, J. J.
    Sherman, M.
    Dawson, L. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S70 - S71
  • [25] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Yang-Xun
    Fu, Yi-Zhen
    Hu, Dan-Dan
    Long, Qian
    Wang, Jun-Cheng
    Xi, Mian
    Liu, Shi-Liang
    Xu, Li
    Liu, Meng-Zhong
    Chen, Min-Shan
    Zhang, Yao-Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [26] Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: No Way Out Without a Randomized Trial?
    Fiorentino, Alba
    Alongi, Filippo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (24) : 2558 - +
  • [27] Stereotactic radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation for early-stage lung cancer
    Piegay, Fabrice
    Girard, Nicolas
    Mornex, Jean-Francois
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2012, 99 (11) : 1077 - 1081
  • [28] Medium-Sized (3.1–5.0 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Alone
    Jin Hyoung Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    Sung Hee Kim
    Hyun-Ki Yoon
    Kyu-Bo Sung
    Pyo Nyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 1624 - 1629
  • [29] Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fu, Yizhen
    Xi, Mian
    Pan, Yangxun
    Chen, Jinbin
    Wang, Juncheng
    Liu, Shiliang
    Xu, Li
    Zhou, Zhongguo
    Liu, Mengzhong
    Chen, Minshan
    Zhao, Lei
    Zhang, Yaojun
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [30] Radiofrequency ablation versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a Markov model-based analysis
    Seo, Young-Seok
    Kim, Mi-Sook
    Yoo, Hyung-Jun
    Jang, Won
    Paik, Eun Kyung
    Han, Chul Ju
    Lee, Byung-Hee
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (11): : 3094 - 3101