Influence of Wet Etching Passivation on Surface Properties of Gallium Arsenide

被引:0
|
作者
Yalei, Zhang [1 ]
Yunping, Lan [1 ]
Jiayuan, Han [1 ]
Hongrong, Zhang [1 ]
Yonggang, Zou [1 ]
机构
[1] Changchun Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab High Power Semicond Laser, Changchun 130013, Jilin, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
thin films; surface chemistry; multistep wet etching passivation; acid solution; photoluminescence intensity; GaAs surface uniformity; SELF-ASSEMBLED MONOLAYERS; GAAS;
D O I
10.3788/CJL231276
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Objective Gallium arsenide (GaAs) is widely used in laser diodes, lasers, solar cells, high-frequency circuits, photodetectors, etc. owing to its high-energy bandwidth and electron mobility. However, when GaAs-based semiconductor devices are exposed to air, their electrical and optical properties deteriorate significantly, which seriously affects their performance. Therefore, the surface performance and stability of GaAs-based semiconductors are important for their application. Wet-etching passivation has considerable significance in the preparation of microdevices and nanodevices owing to its low cost and simple operation. 1-octadecanethiol (ODT) solution demonstrates a better passivation effect than other low-carbon chains. However, GaAs substrates must be etched with an acidic solution before passivation. The etching results directly affect the quality of the self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) formed on the GaAs substrate surfaces. According to theoretical analysis, the use of two different acid solutions can better control the etching speed and byproducts. However, there have been few reported studies on the effects of multistep wet-etching passivation on the surface of GaAs substrates. Therefore, in this study, two acidic solutions, H2SO4 (the volume ratio of H2SO4,H2O2,and H2O is 1:4:x) and HCl ( the volume ratio of HCl,H2O2,and H2O is 1:1:6), are used to etch the GaAs substrate. The ODT solution is used to passivate the GaAs substrate. Methods n-type doped GaAs (100) substrate with a Si volume fraction of 2.00x10(18)?3.12x10(18) is used in the experiment. To remove organic pollutants from the surface, the GaAs substrate is ultrasonically cleaned with acetone, ethanol, and deionized water for 2 min, followed by N-2 drying. To remove the natural oxides and adsorbent atoms from the GaAs substrate surface, the sample is etched with a H2SO4 solution (the volume ratio of H2SO4,H2O2,and H2O is 1:4:x ) and a HCl solution (the volume ratio of HCl,H2O2,and H2O is 1:1:6), and then rinsed with anhydrous ethanol followed by N-2 drying. Finally, the electrode is passivated with an ODT in anhydrous ethanol solution. Results and Discussions The oxide layer on the GaAs substrate surface increases surface state density. Furthermore, the byproducts produced by different acid solutions have different effects on the GaAs substrate surface. Therefore, experimental etching schemes for different acidic solutions are designed in this study. The photoluminescence (PL) intensities of the samples after etching and passivation are higher than that of the GaAs substrate, proving that this process reduces the surface state density of the GaAs substrate. In addition, the etching time is found to be an important parameter in the acid solution etching process. The H2SO4 solution prepared in this study is highly corrosive, such that prolonged etching causes secondary damage to the surface of the GaAs substrate. Therefore, a comparative experiment without the ODT solution treatment is designed to verify the passivation effect of the ODT solution. The PL intensity is 2.5 times that of the GaAs substrate when the acid solution etching time is 90 s. As the etching time increases, the PL intensity is found to decrease. This is because over-oxidation occurs on the GaAs substrate surface during prolonged etching by the H2SO4 solution. The acid solution etching process involves simultaneous exchange of the surface chemical bonds HO-OH and Ga-As. When this process is repeated twice, Ga3+ and As(OH)(3) are formed. To optimize the etching process parameters, an experimental scheme in the absence of H2O2 in the acid solution under different H2SO4 solution concentrations is designed. When the concentrations of H2SO4 and H2O2 are reduced to 1/4 those in the original solution, the PL intensity is the highest, which is 3.02 times that of the GaAs substrate. The surface morphology of the GaAs substrate is optimized using an etching-passivation process. The surface is clean and smooth without obvious pits or impurities. To analyze the stability of the GaAs substrate after etching and passivation, the sample is exposed to an ultraclean environment for 60 d. Such sample surfaces still exhibit good uniformity. The PL intensity of the sample is 2.55 times that of the GaAs substrate. It is proven that the etching passivation process not only reduces the surface state density but also effectively improves its stability. Conclusions The effects of different acid solutions, etching time, acid solution concentrations, H2O2 in the acid solutions, and ODT solutions on the wet-etching passivation process are analyzed in detail. When the etching time of the H2SO4 solution (the volume ratio of H2SO4,H2O2,and H2O is 1:4:15) and the etching time of HCl solution (the volume ratio of HCl,H2O2,and H2O is 1:1:6) are both 90 s, the PL intensity is 3.02 times that of the GaAs substrate. When the sample is exposed to an ultra-cleaning environment for 60 d, the PL intensity is 2.55 times that of the GaAs substrate. This is consistent with the variation trend of peak intensity in the spectrogram by fast fluorescence spectrometer. After etching and passivation, the central wavelength homogeneity is improved and the full width at half- maximum is reduced according to the test results by fast fluorescence spectrometer. Raman analysis shows that the peak intensity ratio of transverse photon and longitudinal photon modes increases, and C and O elements are not detected in the energy dispersive spectra, proving that this process can effectively reduce the surface defects and surface state density. In addition, scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope analyses shows that the etching passivation process can improve the large micrometer defects on the sample surface, but the surface roughness increases after etching passivation, which is consistent with the conclusions of existing etching passivation studies. In conclusion, this study provides an effective multistep acid solution etching theory and technology that can effectively reduce the GaAs defect density. The described etching passivation process is beneficial for expanding the applications of GaAs in the semiconductor field.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [31] Nanoscale etching of III-V semiconductors in acidic hydrogen peroxide solution: GaAs and InP, a striking contrast in surface chemistry
    van Dorp, Dennis H.
    Arnauts, Sophia
    Laitinen, Mikko
    Sajavaara, Timo
    Meersschaut, Johan
    Conard, Thierry
    Kelly, John J.
    [J]. APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2019, 465 : 596 - 606
  • [32] Nanoscale Etching of In0.53Ga0.47As in H2O2/HCl Solutions for Advanced CMOS Processing
    van Dorp, Dennis H.
    Arnauts, Sophia
    Cuypers, Daniel
    Rip, Jens
    Holsteyns, Frank
    De Gendt, Stefan
    Kelly, John J.
    [J]. ECS JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 3 (06) : P179 - P184
  • [33] Effect of Surface Sulfur Passivation on Photoresponse Characteristics of GaAs Materials
    Xia Ning
    Fang Xuan
    Rong Tianyu
    Wang Dengkui
    Fang Dan
    Tang Jilong
    Wang Xinwei
    Wang Xiaohua
    Li Yongfeng
    Yao Bin
    Wei Zhipeng
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF LASERS-ZHONGGUO JIGUANG, 2018, 45 (06):
  • [34] Analysis of Inverted GaInP/GaAs/InGaAs Triple-Junction Solar Cell Failure
    Zhang Yi
    Long Junhua
    Sun Qiangjian
    Xuan Jingjing
    Li Xuefei
    Wang Xia
    Chen Zhitao
    Wu Xiaoxu
    Lu Shulong
    [J]. ACTA OPTICA SINICA, 2022, 42 (20)
  • [35] Property Improvement of GaAs Surface by 1-Octadecanethiol Passivation
    Zhou, Lu
    Chu, Xuefeng
    Chi, Yaodan
    Yang, Xiaotian
    [J]. CRYSTALS, 2019, 9 (03):