Teaching abductive reasoning for use as a problem-solving tool in organic chemistry and beyond

被引:0
|
作者
Wackerly, Jay Wm. [1 ]
Wentzel, Michael T. [2 ]
Zingales, Sarah K. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cent Coll, Dept Nat Sci, Chem Program, Pella, IA 50219 USA
[2] Augsburg Univ, Dept Chem, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ St Joseph, Dept Chem, West Hartford, CT USA
[4] United States Coast Guard Acad, Dept Chem & Environm Sci, New London, CT USA
关键词
abduction; abductive reasoning; organic chemistry; diagnosis; metacognition; problem solving; pre-health education; EXPERT; EXPLANATION; INFERENCE; THINKING;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2024.1412417
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The second-year undergraduate Organic Chemistry course sequence is often cited as one of the most, if not the most, challenging for students in the US. Thus, a persistent question remains: What is it about Organic Chemistry that makes the course so difficult for students? Herein, we put forward the hypothesis that a new mode of thinking and problem solving is expected of the students; these skills have not yet been developed in their prior scientific coursework and are often not deliberately taught in Organic Chemistry. This form of reasoning and problem solving, known as abductive reasoning, is highlighted for its connection to medical diagnosis and scientific thinking. We provide examples to showcase how instructors could explicitly foreground the reasoning process in their classroom. Ultimately, we argue that teaching how to reason using abduction may benefit students in both the short term (in the course) and the long term (in their careers as scientists and medical practitioners).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条