Technological innovation, globalization and ecological quality: A disaggregated ecological footprint approach for BRICS countries

被引:0
|
作者
Pata, Ugur Korkut [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tiwari, Aviral Kumar [5 ]
Erdogan, Sinan [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hatay Mustafa Kemal Univ, Dept Econ, Hatay, Turkiye
[2] Korea Univ, Coll Polit Sci & Econ, Dept Econ, Seoul 02481, South Korea
[3] Azerbaijan State Univ Econ UNEC, Clin Econ, Baku, Azerbaijan
[4] European Univ Lefke, Adv Res Ctr, TR 10 Mersin, Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Turkiye
[5] Indian Inst Management Bodh Gaya IIM Bodh Gaya, Bodh Gaya 824234, Bihar, India
[6] Western Caspian Univ, Econ Res Ctr WCERC, Baku, Azerbaijan
关键词
Ecological footprint; Globalization; Patents; Technology; BRICS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; KUZNETS CURVE; POLLUTION; COINTEGRATION; HYPOTHESIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122518
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological footprint (EF) has become one of the leading indicators for environmental assessments. The EF is an indicator that is at the center of researchers' interest in empirical analysis, as it simultaneously reflects air, water, and soil pollution. Analyzing the six sub-components of the EF is essential for assessing the environmental pressures from forestry, construction, fisheries, agriculture, and livestock, as well as for remediating these pressures. In this context, this study examines the impact of income, globalization, and technological progress (represented by patents) on the EF and its subcomponents for the BRICS countries over the period 1992-2020. The BRICS countries are of critical importance to this study as major countries in the global economic and environmental landscape. The study employs the panel LM cointegration test and the common correlated effects estimator. The results show that economic expansion augments ecological, carbon, and built-up land footprints and that patents have no significant impact on the EF indicators. On the contrary, globalization is a factor that reduces five of the seven EF indicators. A robustness check performed with a half-panel jackknife confirms the analysis findings. These results suggest that BRICS policymakers should harmonize economic development and ecology while making greater use of the environmental benefits of globalization.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Circular economy and ecological footprint: A disaggregated analysis for the EU
    Chen, Chun-Chih
    Pao, Hsiao-Tien
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160
  • [22] The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries
    Sabir, Samina
    Gorus, Muhammed Sehid
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (32) : 33387 - 33398
  • [23] The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries
    Samina Sabir
    Muhammed Sehid Gorus
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 33387 - 33398
  • [24] Analysis of the Effect of Selected Economic Variables on Ecological Footprint: The Case of BRICS-T Countries
    Duman, Erhan
    SOSYOEKONOMI, 2023, 31 (58) : 277 - 288
  • [25] The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries
    Nattapan Kongbuamai
    Quocviet Bui
    Suthep Nimsai
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 27885 - 27899
  • [26] Ecological modernization, technological change and globalization
    Foladori, Guillermo
    ECONOMIA SOCIEDAD Y TERRITORIO, 2005, 5 (18): : 335 - 353
  • [27] The effects of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption on the ecological footprint: the role of environmental policy in BRICS countries
    Kongbuamai, Nattapan
    Bui, Quocviet
    Nimsai, Suthep
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (22) : 27885 - 27899
  • [28] Role of economic complexity and technological innovation for ecological footprint in newly industrialized countries: Does geothermal energy consumption matter?
    Bashir, Muhammad Adnan
    Dengfeng, Zhao
    Filipiak, Beata Zofia
    Bilan, Yuriy
    Vasa, Laszlo
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 217
  • [29] REGIONAL ISSUE, INNOVATION, AND THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT
    Spitsin, Vladislav
    Vukovic, Darko B.
    Akerman, Elena
    Borilo, Ludmila
    Chistyakova, Natalia
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL INSTITUTE JOVAN CVIJIC SASA, 2023, 73 (02): : 221 - 236
  • [30] How does technological innovation affect the ecological footprint? Evidence from E-7 countries in the background of the SDGs
    Dam, Mehmet Metin
    Kaya, Funda
    Bekun, Festus Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 443