Routinely-Collected Outcomes of Proximal Row Carpectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Teunissen, Joris S. [1 ,2 ]
Duraku, Liron S. [3 ,4 ]
Feitz, Reinier [1 ,2 ]
Zuidam, J. Michiel [4 ]
Selles, Ruud W. [4 ,5 ]
Wouters, Robbert M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Xpert Clin, Hand & Wrist Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Rehabil Med, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Arthritis; PROMs; proximal row carpectomy; wrist; 4-CORNER ARTHRODESIS; WRIST CONDITIONS; HAND; OSTEOARTHRITIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REINSERTION; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.09.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To describe patient-reported pain and function 12 months after proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Secondary outcomes included return to work, grip strength, range of wrist motion, satisfaction with treatment results, and complications. Methods This cohort study was part of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand Studyathon 2021, using ongoing routinely-collected data of 304 eligible patients who underwent PRC (73% scapholunate advanced collapse, 11% scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist; 11% Kienb & ouml;ck, 5% other indications) from Xpert Clinics, the Netherlands between 2012-2020.- 2020. The primary outcome was the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation total score (range, 0-100,- 100, lower scores indicate better performance). Results Of the 304 patients, the primary outcome was available in 217 patients. The total Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation score improved from 60 (95% confidence fi dence interval [CI], 57-63)- 63) to 38 (95% CI, 35-41)- 41) at 3 months, and 26 (95% CI, 23-29)- 29) at 12 months. The pain and function subscales improved by 18 (95% CI, 17-20)- 20) and 16 (95% CI, 14-18)- 18) points, respectively. At 12 months, 82% had returned to work at a median time of 12 (95% CI, 9-14)- 14) weeks following PRC. Grip strength did not improve. Wrist fl exion and extension demonstrated a clinically irrelevant decrease. Satisfaction with treatment result was excellent in 27% of patients, good in 42%, fair in 20%, moderate in 6%, and poor in 5%. Complications occurred in 11% of patients, and conversion to wrist arthroplasty occurred in 2 patients. Conclusion A clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported pain and function was observed at 3 months after PRC, with continued improvement to 12 months. These data can be used for shared- decision making and expectation management. (J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49(8):795.e1-e9. Copyright (c) 2024 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).)
引用
收藏
页码:795e1 / 795e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-term outcomes of proximal row carpectomy: A series of 62 cases
    Chedal-Bornu, B.
    Corcella, D.
    Forli, A.
    Moutet, F.
    Bouyer, M.
    HAND SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2017, 36 (05): : 355 - 362
  • [22] Proximal row carpectomy for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion
    Culp, RW
    Williams, CS
    HAND CLINICS, 2001, 17 (04) : 663 - +
  • [23] Long-Term Outcomes of Proximal Row Carpectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Chim, Harvey
    Moran, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 2012, 1 (02) : 141 - 147
  • [24] Proximal Row Carpectomy With Soft Tissue Interposition: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes
    Aravinthan, Neveadan
    Siddiqui, Salwa
    Khan, Moin
    Moro, Jaydeep
    Pino, Paula A.
    Prada, Carlos
    HAND-AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR HAND SURGERY, 2024,
  • [25] PROXIMAL ROW CARPECTOMY - CLINICAL-EVALUATION
    IMBRIGLIA, JE
    BROUDY, AS
    HAGBERG, WC
    MCKERNAN, D
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 15A (03): : 426 - 430
  • [26] Proximal row carpectomy with partial capitate resection
    Salomon, GD
    Eaton, RG
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (01): : 2 - 8
  • [27] Proximal row carpectomy through a palmar approach
    Luchetti, R
    Soragni, O
    Fairplay, T
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1998, 23B (03): : 406 - 409
  • [28] Proximal Row Carpectomy Combined with Wrist Hemiarthroplasty
    Culp, Randall W.
    Bachoura, Abdo
    Gelman, Scott E.
    Jacoby, Sidney M.
    JOURNAL OF WRIST SURGERY, 2012, 1 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [29] Proximal row carpectomy: A worthwhile salvage procedure
    Nagelvoort, RWK
    Kon, M
    Schuurman, AH
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2002, 36 (05): : 289 - 299
  • [30] PROXIMAL ROW CARPECTOMY - A REVIEW OF 24 PATIENTS
    FOUCHER, G
    CHMIEL, Z
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1992, 78 (06): : 372 - 378