Original vs. Generic Plerixafor for the Mobilization of Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Kaya, Sureyya Yigit [1 ]
Mutlu, Yasa Gul [1 ]
Yucel, Orhan Kemal [2 ]
Ozen, Ilknur Nizam [3 ]
Atas, Unal [2 ]
Melek, Elif [1 ]
Maral, Senem [1 ]
Karakus, Volkan [3 ]
Kaynar, Leylagul [1 ]
Sevindik, Omuer Gokmen [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Fac Med, Dept Hematol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Akdeniz Univ, Fac Med, Dept Hematol, Antalya, Turkiye
[3] Antalya Training & Res Hosp, Dept Hematol, Antalya, Turkiye
关键词
Multiple myeloma; Stem cell; Mobilization; Generic; Plerixafor;
D O I
10.1007/s12288-024-01841-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study investigates the efficacy and safety of generic plerixafor (Pleksor - Gen Pharma) compared to the original plerixafor (Mozobil - Sanofi) in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing ASCT. A total of 59 patients from three centers, who underwent ASCT between 2018 and 2023, were included and divided into two groups: Mozobil (M) group (n = 32) and Pleksor (P) group (n = 27). Plerixafor was administered as a just-in-time approach with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or with cyclophosphamide (Cy) + G-CSF mobilization. The study aimed to assess mobilization success and engraftment kinetics. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, RT history, previous lines of treatment, pretransplant lenalidomide cycles (p = 0.778, 0.165, 0.520, 0.094, 0.530, respectively). However, lenalidomide exposure was significantly higher in P group (18,8% vs. 81,5%, p < 0.001). Both groups achieved a similar total yield of CD34 + cells, and no serious side effects related to plerixafor were noted. Median platelet engraftment time was longer in P group, while neutrophil engraftment time was similar in both groups. This study demonstrates the comparable efficacy of generic plerixafor in myeloma patients, suggesting that it can be a cost-effective alternative with a similar safety profile. These findings contribute to the body of evidence on the use of generic plerixafor in specific patient cohorts, emphasizing its efficacy and safety for ASCT in a sole multiple myeloma patient cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 42
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical and cost outcomes of pre-emptive plerixafor administration in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell mobilization
    Andritsos, Leslie A.
    Huang, Ying
    Abraham, Ivo
    Huff, Keith
    Scrape, Scott R.
    Fan, Tao
    Alkhatib, Nimer
    Hofmeister, Craig C.
    Drea, Edward
    McBride, Ali
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2019, 85
  • [32] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Motixafortide Versus Plerixafor in Stem Cell Mobilization for Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Lamotte, Mark
    DiPersio, John F.
    Siegel, David
    Meron, Haddas
    Gerlier, Laetitia
    BLOOD, 2022, 140 : 10794 - 10795
  • [33] Plerixafor and G-CSF Versus Cyclophosphamide and G-CSF for Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Nazha, Aziz
    Cook, Rachel
    Vogl, Dan T.
    Mangan, Patricia A.
    Hummel, Kimberly
    Cunningham, Kathleen
    Luger, Selina
    Porter, David
    Schuster, Stephen J.
    O'Doherty, Una
    Sell, Mary
    Siegel, Don L.
    Stadtmauer, Edward A.
    BLOOD, 2009, 114 (22) : 844 - 844
  • [34] New Insights in the Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma Patients
    Angelopoulou, Maria K.
    Tsirkinidis, Pantelis
    Boutsikas, Georgios
    Vassilakopoulos, Theodoros P.
    Tsirigotis, Panayiotis
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [35] OPTIMIZATION OF REGIMES OF MOBILIZATION OF BLOOD HEMOPOIETIC STEM CELLS IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Pokrovskaya, O. S.
    Mendeleeva, L. P.
    Urnova, E. S.
    Gaponova, T. V.
    Gribanova, E. O.
    Alekseeva, I. V.
    Drokov, M. Yu.
    Kalinin, N. N.
    Gretsov, E. M.
    Klyasova, G. A.
    Savchenko, V. G.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2011, 83 (07) : 50 - 57
  • [36] CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PRIMING WITH INTRAVENOUS PLERIXAFOR AND GCSF MOBILIZATION FOR MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Krishnan, A.
    Wang, S.
    Htut, M.
    Farol, L.
    Palmer, J.
    Quazi, I
    Forman, S.
    Tsai, N.
    Forman, S.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (02) : S262 - S262
  • [37] A phase I study of intravenous plerixafor following cyclophosphamide mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma
    Krishnan, Amrita Y.
    Wang, Shirong
    Palmer, Joycelynne M.
    Tsai, Ni-Chun
    Thomas, Sandra H.
    Htut, Myo
    Farol, Len
    Forman, Stephen J.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2014, 55 (01) : 201 - 203
  • [38] An Algorithmic Approach TO Pre-Emptive Plerixafor Usage with Gcsf Alone For Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells in Multiple Myeloma
    Kodad, Shruthi
    Aggarwal, Vibhuti
    Stakiw, Julie
    Sabry, Waleed
    Bosch, Mark
    Sarker, Sabuj
    Elemary, Mohamed
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 56 (SUPPL 1) : 330 - 330
  • [39] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PLERIXAFOR PLUS GCSF FOR MOBILIZATION OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELLS IN PATIENTS WITH MYELOMA AND LYMPHOMA IN SPAIN
    Duarte, R. F.
    Perez-Simon, J. A.
    Martin, G.
    de la Rubia, J.
    Marin, P.
    Alvarez, M. A.
    Espinos, B.
    Roset, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A423 - A423
  • [40] Are We Choosing Mobilization Regimens for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma Wisely?: A Single Centre Comparison of GCSF plus /-Plerixafor Vs Cyclophosphamide/GCSF plus /- Plerixafor
    Yang, Chloe
    Dehghani, Mina
    Hopman, Wilma
    Bhella, Sita D.
    BLOOD, 2019, 134