CAN SIMPLE REACTION TIME TO A VISUAL STIMULUS BE USED AS A MEASURE OF THE BALANCE TASK INTENSITY?

被引:0
|
作者
Moskon, Sara [1 ]
Kokalj, Petra [1 ]
Tomazin, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Sport, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
来源
KINESIOLOGIA SLOVENICA | 2024年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
relative intensity; simple reaction time; dual tasks; FITT; POSTURAL CONTROL; PRIORITIZATION; ATTENTION; EXERCISE; WALKING; ADULTS; AGE;
D O I
10.52165/kinsi.30.2.94-104
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Correctly determining the frequency, intensity and duration of balance tasks (BT) is crucial for effective balance training. While the frequency and BT duration are well defined, understanding BT intensity remains limited. Higher BT intensity demands greater attentional capacity for postural control. To assess the role of attention in postural control the dual-task paradigm including BT with reaction time (RT) is often used, suggesting RT as a potential measure of BT relative intensity. The study aimed to determine whether simple RT can be a surrogate for the relative BT intensity. Twenty randomly selected participants performed six repetitions of two-legged and one-legged stances on firm and compliant surfaces on a force plate. During the execution of the BT, the participants had to react on illumination of the light by pressing a switch held in their dominant hand. The center of pressure (COP) velocity and the RT were investigated. The BT were categorized into low, moderate and high intensities. The results showed a significant increase in COP velocity from low to high intensity BT (p=0.001; 11 2=0.79). Moderate intensity BT resulted in a 123.6% increase in COP velocity compared to the low intensity BT. During high-intensity BT COP velocity increased by 244.2 % (p < 0.001). There were no differences in RT between different BT intensities (p=0.596; 11 2=0.03). The results suggest that RT may not accurately reflect the BT intensity. Therefore, it can be concluded that simple visual RT could not be used as a measure of relative intensity of BT.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 104
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] STIMULUS INTENSITY, INTERTRIAL INTERVAL, AND MODALITY AND INTENSITY OF PRECEDING RESPONSE SIGNAL AS DETERMINANTS OF SIMPLE REACTION-TIME TO AUDITORY AND VISUAL SIGNALS
    KOHFELD, DL
    NULLMEYE.R
    GOEDECKE, D
    PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1972, 29 (4B): : 270 - &
  • [22] Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance
    Robert Langner
    Klaus Willmes
    Anjan Chatterjee
    Simon B. Eickhoff
    Walter Sturm
    Psychological Research, 2010, 74 : 499 - 512
  • [23] JOINT EFFECTS OF STIMULUS INTENSITY AND PREPARATORY INTERVAL ON SIMPLE AUDITORY REACTION TIME
    BOTWINIC.J
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 80 (2P1): : 348 - &
  • [24] Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance
    Langner, Robert
    Willmes, Klaus
    Chatterjee, Anjan
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Sturm, Walter
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2010, 74 (05): : 499 - 512
  • [25] EFFECTS OF INTENSITY OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL READY SIGNALS ON SIMPLE REACTION TIME
    KOHFELD, DL
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 82 (1P1): : 88 - +
  • [26] PERIPHERAL AREA INTENSITY INTERACTION IN SIMPLE VISUAL REACTION-TIME
    DWYER, WO
    WHITE, CS
    VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (10) : 971 - 974
  • [27] STIMULUS PROBABILITY AND SIMPLE REACTION TIME
    GORDON, IE
    NATURE, 1967, 215 (5103) : 895 - &
  • [28] CRITERION EFFECTS IN SIMPLE REACTION-TIME - RESULTS WITH STIMULUS INTENSITY AND DURATION MANIPULATIONS
    SANFORD, AJ
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 95 (02): : 370 - &
  • [29] Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus
    A. H. Bell
    M. A. Meredith
    A. J. Van Opstal
    D. P. Munoz
    Experimental Brain Research, 2006, 174 : 53 - 59
  • [30] Stimulus intensity modifies saccadic reaction time and visual response latency in the superior colliculus
    Bell, A. H.
    Meredith, M. A.
    Van Opstal, A. J.
    Munoz, D. P.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 174 (01) : 53 - 59