An in vitro comparison of apically extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium instruments

被引:10
|
作者
Tasdemir, Tamer [1 ]
Er, Kursat [1 ]
Celik, Davut [1 ]
Aydemir, Hikmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Endodont, Fac Dent, Samsun, Turkey
关键词
apical debris extrusion; root canal preparation; rotary instruments; BACTERIA FOLLOWING USE; 2; HAND; EXTRUSION;
D O I
10.1016/S1991-7902(10)60017-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background/purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the amount of extruded debris using three rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments (ProTaper Universal, Mtwo, and BioRaCe). Materials and methods: Sixty freshly extracted human single-rooted mandibular premolars were randomly assigned into three groups of 20 teeth each. The root canals were instrumented using ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Mtwo (VDW, Munich, Germany), or BioRaCe (FKG Dentaire, La-Chauxde-Fonds, Switzerland) NiTi instruments. Debris and liquid extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into tubes. Then, the liquid inside the tubes was removed by lyophilization, and the mean weight of the remaining debris was calculated for each group and compared. Data were then statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests. Results: There were significant differences in the amount of debris extruded among all groups (P<0.01). The greatest amount of apical debris was extruded by the ProTaper Universal group and the least by the BioRaCe group. Conclusion: According to this study, all instrumentation techniques apically extruded debris through the apical foramen. However, the BioRaCe instruments induced less extruded debris than the ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary systems.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dentine chips produced by nickel-titanium rotary instruments
    Guppy, DR
    Curtis, RV
    Ford, TRP
    ENDODONTICS & DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2000, 16 (06): : 258 - 264
  • [32] A cleaning protocol for rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments
    Parashos, P
    Linsuwanont, P
    Messer, HH
    AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2004, 49 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [33] Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the canal preparation using new heat-treated nickel-titanium files in curved canals
    Duzgun, Salih
    Topcuoglu, Huseyin Sinan
    Kahraman, Omur
    AUSTRALIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2021, 47 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [34] Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments: Mechanical and Metallurgical Characteristics
    Zanza, Alessio
    Reda, Rodolfo
    Testarelli, Luca
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 12 (01) : 94 - 96
  • [35] Dynamic Torsional Resistance of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments
    Park, Su-Young
    Cheung, Gary S. P.
    Yum, Jiwan
    Hur, Bock
    Park, Jeong-Kil
    Kim, Hyeon-Cheol
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (07) : 1200 - 1204
  • [36] Electrochemical Properties of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Endodontic Instruments
    Subramanian, Vidyalakshmi
    Roberts, Howard W.
    Han, Shengtong
    Sidow, Stephanie J.
    Berzins, David W.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2024, 50 (08) : 1143 - 1150
  • [37] Laboratory comparison of the mechanical properties of TRUShape with several nickel-titanium rotary instruments
    Elnaghy, A. M.
    Elsaka, S. E.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2017, 50 (08) : 805 - 812
  • [38] Fracture resistance of electropolished rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments
    Anderson, Margot E.
    Price, John W. H.
    Parashos, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (10) : 1212 - 1216
  • [39] Angle of Insertion and Torsional Resistance of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments
    Di Nardo, Dario
    Zanza, Alessio
    Seracchiani, Marco
    Donfrancesco, Orlando
    Gambarini, Gianluca
    Testarelli, Luca
    MATERIALS, 2021, 14 (13)
  • [40] A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals
    Yun, HH
    Kim, SK
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2003, 95 (02): : 228 - 233