Identification and Analysis of the Ankle Microbiome Using Next-Generation DNA Sequencing: An Observational Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Hoch, Caroline [2 ]
Allen, J. Ryan [1 ]
Morningstar, Joshua [1 ]
Materon, Solangel Rodriguez [1 ]
Scott, Daniel J. [1 ]
Gross, Christopher E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Orthopaed & Phys, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY;
D O I
10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00387
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction:Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) technologies have increased the sensitivity for detecting the bacterial presence and have been used in other areas of orthopaedics to better understand the native microbiome of various joints. This study uses NGS to determine whether (1) a unique microbiome exists in human ankle tissues, (2) if components of the ankle microbiome affect patient outcomes, and (3) whether microbes found on the skin are a normal part of the ankle microbiome.Methods:A prospective study recruited 32 patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (n = 23) or ankle arthrodesis (n = 9) via direct anterior approach between November 2020 and October 2021. During surgery, five layers of the ankle were swabbed: skin (n = 32), retinaculum (n = 31), tibialis anterior tendon (n = 31), joint capsule (n = 31), and distal tibia (n = 32). These swabs (N = 157) were sent to MicroGen Diagnostics (Lubbock) for NGS. Demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical indication, postoperative complications, readmission, and revision surgery rates were collected from patient records.Results:The mean age was 60.7 (range, 19 to 85) years, and the mean follow-up duration was 10.2 (range, 4.8 to 20.6) months. Of 157 swabs sent for NGS, 19 (12.1%) indicated that bacteria were present (positive), whereas the remaining 138 (87.9%) had no bacteria present (negative). The most common organisms were Cutibacterium acnes in eight ankles (25.0%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in two ankles (6.25%). Most bacteria were found in the retinaculum (29.6%). Complications, nonunions, infections, 90-day readmission, and revision surgery rates did not differ by NGS profile.Discussion:This study found that C acnes and S epidermidis were the most common bacteria in the ankle microbiome, with C acnes being present in 25% of ankles. Complication rates did not differ between patients with or without positive bacterial DNA remnants. Thus, we concluded that a unique ankle microbiome is present in some patients, which is unique from that of the skin of the ankle.Level of evidenceLevel II, Prospective cohort study.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 792
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pathway analysis with next-generation sequencing data
    Jinying Zhao
    Yun Zhu
    Eric Boerwinkle
    Momiao Xiong
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2015, 23 : 507 - 515
  • [22] Focus on next-generation sequencing data analysis
    Rusk N.
    Nature Methods, 2009, 6 (Suppl 11) : S1 - S1
  • [23] Linkage Analysis in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era
    Bailey-Wilson, Joan E.
    Wilson, Alexander F.
    HUMAN HEREDITY, 2011, 72 (04) : 228 - 236
  • [24] Applications and data analysis of next-generation sequencing
    Vogl, Ina
    Benet-Pages, Anna
    Eck, Sebastian H.
    Kuhn, Marius
    Vosberg, Sebastian
    Greif, Philipp A.
    Metzeler, Klaus H.
    Biskup, Saskia
    Mueller-Reible, Clemens
    Klein, Hanns-Georg
    LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 37 (06): : 305 - 315
  • [25] Pathway analysis with next-generation sequencing data
    Zhao, Jinying
    Zhu, Yun
    Boerwinkle, Eric
    Xiong, Momiao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (04) : 507 - 515
  • [26] Mosaicism: challenges for next-generation sequencing analysis
    Sanchez, Louisa
    Douglas, Evelyn
    Lawrence, David
    Soubrier, Julien
    Gao, Song
    McGregor, Lesley
    Barnett, Christopher
    Kassahn, Karin
    Yu, Sui
    Friend, Kathryn
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (SUPPL 1) : 474 - 474
  • [27] A New Era of the Vaginal Microbiome: Advances Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Fettweis, Jennifer M.
    Serrano, Myrna G.
    Girerd, Philippe H.
    Jefferson, Kimberly K.
    Buck, Gregory A.
    CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY, 2012, 9 (05) : 965 - 976
  • [28] Investigation of the Calculus Microbiome in Canines and Felines Using Next-Generation Sequencing
    Radeerom, Tiwaporn
    Thongkorn, Kriangkrai
    Buddhachat, Kittisak
    Pradit, Waranee
    Chomdej, Siriwadee
    Siengdee, Puntita
    Nganvongpanit, Korakot
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2018, 24 (04) : 589 - 598
  • [29] Next-generation DNA sequencing methods
    Mardis, Elaine R.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, 2008, 9 : 387 - 402
  • [30] Next-generation DNA damage sequencing
    Mingard, Cecile
    Wu, Junzhou
    McKeague, Maureen
    Sturla, Shana J.
    CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS, 2020, 49 (20) : 7354 - 7377