Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Seward, Michael W. [1 ]
Hannon, Charles P. [1 ]
Yuan, Brandon J. [1 ]
Kearns, Ann E. [2 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [3 ]
Berry, Daniel J. [1 ]
Abdel, Matthew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Endocrinol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Madison, WI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 10期
关键词
osteoporosis; total hip arthroplasty; periprosthetic fractures; metabolic bone diseases; bone mineral density; PRIOR FRAGILITY FRACTURES; RISK-FACTORS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury. Methods: We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age- appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21). Results: Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08). Conclusions: Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2621 / 2626
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment of periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty
    Boulton, C. L.
    Rodriguez, E. K.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2009, 20 (01): : 58 - 64
  • [42] Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty
    Peterson, CA
    Lewallen, DG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (08): : 1206 - 1213
  • [43] Diagnosis and management of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty
    Giaretta, Stefano
    Momoli, Alberto
    Porcelli, Giovanna
    Micheloni, Gian Mario
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 : S29 - S33
  • [44] Biomechanics of Osteosynthesis in Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Skala-Rosenbaum, J.
    Dzupa, V
    Krbec, M.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2020, 87 (05) : 309 - 317
  • [45] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Abdel, Matthew P.
    Cottino, Umberto
    Mabry, Tad M.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) : 2005 - 2010
  • [46] Impaction bone grafting for periprosthetic fractures around a total hip arthroplasty
    Youssef, Bishoy
    Pavlou, George
    Shah, Nikhil
    Macheras, George
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2014, 45 (11): : 1674 - 1680
  • [47] Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Does the Mode of Failure Correlate With Classification?
    Gausden, Elizabeth B.
    Beiene, Zodina A.
    Blevins, Jason L.
    Christ, Alexander B.
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Helfet, David L.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    Mayman, David J.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2021, 36 (07): : 2597 - 2602
  • [48] Morphologic Analysis of Periprosthetic Fractures After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Zustin, Jozef
    Krause, Matthias
    Breer, Stefan
    Hahn, Michael
    von Domarus, Christoph
    Ruether, Wolfgang
    Sauter, Guido
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Amling, Michael
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (02): : 404 - 410
  • [49] Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty - Evaluation and management
    Davidson, Darin
    Pike, Jeffrey
    Garbuz, Donald
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09): : 2000 - 2012
  • [50] Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review
    Matthew P. Abdel
    Umberto Cottino
    Tad M. Mabry
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 2005 - 2010