Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Seward, Michael W. [1 ]
Hannon, Charles P. [1 ]
Yuan, Brandon J. [1 ]
Kearns, Ann E. [2 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [3 ]
Berry, Daniel J. [1 ]
Abdel, Matthew P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Endocrinol, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Madison, WI USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2024年 / 39卷 / 10期
关键词
osteoporosis; total hip arthroplasty; periprosthetic fractures; metabolic bone diseases; bone mineral density; PRIOR FRAGILITY FRACTURES; RISK-FACTORS; FEMORAL FRACTURES; MANAGEMENT; FEMUR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ASSOCIATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.06.002
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury. Methods: We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age- appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21). Results: Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08). Conclusions: Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:2621 / 2626
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OSTEOPOROSIS AND THE INCIDENCE OF PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER UNCEMENTED PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
    Ene, R.
    Nica, M.
    Panti, Z.
    Ene, P.
    Cirstoiu, M.
    Cirstoiu, C.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 26 : S449 - S449
  • [2] Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
    Young, Simon W.
    Pandit, Salil
    Munro, Jacob T.
    Pitto, Rocco P.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (06) : 424 - 428
  • [3] Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty
    Van Flandern, GJ
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2005, 28 (09) : S1089 - S1095
  • [4] Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Kunovsky, R.
    Pink, T.
    Shaker, A.
    Jarosik, J.
    Pasa, L.
    Vesely, R.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2016, 83 (05) : 317 - 326
  • [5] Periprosthetic fractures in enclosed total hip arthroplasty
    Faschingbauer, M.
    Kessler, S.
    Juergens, C.
    TRAUMA UND BERUFSKRANKHEIT, 2014, 16 : 349 - 353
  • [6] Periprosthetic fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty
    Kyle, RF
    Crickard, GE
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1998, 21 (09) : 982 - 984
  • [7] Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Dauder-Gallego, Cristina
    Lopez-Hualda, Alvaro
    Ferreno-Marquez, David Manuel
    Sosa-Reina, Maria Dolores
    Villafane, Jorge Hugo
    Martinez-Martin, Javier
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2024, 40 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [8] Periprosthetic femoral fractures in total hip arthroplasty
    Ohly, Nicholas E.
    Whitehouse, Michael R.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 24 (06) : 556 - 567
  • [9] Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty: An algorithm of treatment
    Pavone, Vito
    de Cristo, Claudia
    Di Stefano, Antonio
    Costarella, Luciano
    Testa, Gianluca
    Sessa, Giuseppe
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2019, 50 : S45 - S51
  • [10] Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty
    Sebecic, B.
    Staresinic, M.
    Culjak, V.
    Japjec, M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH EUROPEAN TRAUMA CONGRESS, 2006, : 67 - +