When all you have is a hammer: how social justice distorts what we know about racial disparities

被引:0
|
作者
Iceland, John [1 ]
Silver, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Sociol, 211 Oswald Tower, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
Racial disparities; Social justice; Critical race theory; Racial inequality; Systemic racism; Culture; CRITICAL RACE THEORY; AFFIRMATIVE-ACTION; ETHNIC-INEQUALITY; POVERTY; CULTURE; DISCRIMINATION; SOCIOLOGY; AFFLUENCE; BELIEFS; AMERICA;
D O I
10.1007/s11186-024-09568-1
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The sociological literature on race operates under the progressive ideological assumption that systemic racism is the predominant cause of racial disparities. This assumption has become "paradigmatic," shaping the selection of research questions and the interpretation of research results. Consequently, the literature offers a rather narrow "Overton window" concerning what we, as sociologists, know about: (1) the causes of racial disparities, (2) the accuracy and motivation behind the public's views on race-related issues, and (3) race-related policy preferences. A paradigm shift is needed to improve our understanding of racial disparities and devise more effective ways to address them. To achieve this end, sociologists should broaden their perspectives beyond attributing all racial disparities to systemic racism and consider additional hypotheses. From a policy perspective, to reduce racial disparities we should reconsider addressing social class and related factors early in life.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1092
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条