In vitro and in vivo evaluation of osteogenesis and antibacterial activity of Mg-Ga alloys

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Ziyue [1 ,2 ]
He, Donglei [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Xueying [1 ]
Ma, Xiaolong [1 ]
Zheng, Yang [6 ]
Gu, Xuenan [7 ]
Li, Yan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Hangzhou Int Innovat Inst, Hangzhou 311115, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, Beijing Adv Innovat Ctr Biomed Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Lab Tribol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Tiangong Univ, Sch Aeronaut & Astronaut, Tianjin 300387, Peoples R China
[7] Beihang Univ, Sch Biol Sci & Med Engn, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Biocompatibility; Osteogenesis; Degradation; Antibacterial; Mg-Ga; HIGH-PURITY MAGNESIUM; CORROSION BEHAVIOR; BONE-RESORPTION; GALLIUM NITRATE; CYTOTOXICITY; BIOMATERIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actbio.2024.07.021
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Mg-Ga alloys are considered highly potential biodegradable materials, owing to its good mechanical properties and appropriate corrosion resistance. However, it is still far from application due to the lack of biological evaluation. In the present study, biocompatibility, osteogenesis and antibacterial activity of extruded Mg-xGa ( x = 1 and 5 wt%) alloys were investigated by in vitro cell culture experiments and in vivo implantation. The cell adhesion and proliferation of osteoblast precursor cells (MC3T3-E1) showed the excellent cytocompatibility of Mg-1Ga and poor cytocompatibility of Mg-5Ga. The osteogenic activity was evaluated and revealed that Ga 3 + in the Mg-1Ga extract had the ability to enhance osteogenic differentiation through the facilitation of its early stages. In vivo studies in a rat femoral condyle model revealed that both Mg-1Ga and Mg-5Ga significantly promoted new bone formation without causing any adverse effects. Mg-5Ga exhibited a much higher corrosion rate in vivo than Mg-1Ga. Its osteogenic activity was better due to the rapid release of Mg2 +and 2 + and Ga3 3 +, , but this caused premature structural integrity loss. Mg-1Ga and Mg-5Ga released Ga 3 + to inhibit E. coli and S. aureus, , with antibacterial rate increasing with Ga content. Our studies demonstrate that Mg-Ga alloys have the potential to be used as osteogenic and antibacterial implant materials. Statement of significance This study evaluates the biocompatibility, osteogenesis, and antibacterial activity of Mg-Ga alloys, which are promising biodegradable materials for medical applications. The study finds that Mg-1Ga exhibits excellent cytocompatibility and promotes osteogenic differentiation, facilitating the early stages of osteoblast precursor cell development. In vivo studies in a rat femoral condyle model reveal that Mg-1Ga and Mg-5Ga significantly promote new bone formation without causing any adverse effects. The antibacterial activity of both alloys is evaluated against E. coli and S. aureus, , with the inhibition rate increasing with Ga content. These findings suggest that Mg-Ga alloys have the potential to serve as osteogenic and antibacterial implant materials, providing significant insights into the development of novel biomedical implants. (c) 2024 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vitro and in vivo comparison of binary Mg alloys and pure Mg
    Myrissa, Anastasia
    Agha, Nezha Ahmad
    Lu, Yiyi
    Martinelli, Elisabeth
    Eichler, Johannes
    Szakacs, Gabor
    Kleinhans, Claudia
    Willumeit-Roemer, Regine
    Schaefer, Ute
    Weinberg, Annelie-Martina
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 61 : 865 - 874
  • [22] Stimulation of in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis by Ti-Mg alloys with the sustained-release function of magnesium ions
    Liang, Luxin
    Huang, Qianli
    Wu, Hong
    Ouyang, Zhengxiao
    Liu, Tang
    He, Hao
    Xiao, Jian
    Lei, Guanghua
    Zhou, Kun
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES, 2021, 197
  • [23] Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of novel Cu(II)-steroid complexes
    Barrett, Stephen
    Delaney, Stephen
    Kavanagh, Kevin
    Montagner, Diego
    INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2018, 479 : 261 - 265
  • [24] In vivo and in vitro antibacterial activity of propolis.
    Kain, G
    Gedalia, Y
    Steinberg, D
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 (05) : 1255 - 1255
  • [25] Rifaximin: In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity - A review
    Jiang, ZD
    DuPont, HL
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2005, 51 : 67 - 72
  • [26] EVALUATION OF PROPOLIS FOR ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY IN VITRO
    Herman, V.
    Iu, Diana Ro.
    Catana, N.
    Degi, J.
    Iancu, Ionica
    Ioana, Mi. I. I.
    Ciobanu, Gh.
    Grema, Corina Fini
    Pascu, Corina
    REVISTA ROMANA DE MEDICINA VETERINARA, 2018, 28 (03): : 13 - 17
  • [27] Optimization of niosomes for enhanced antibacterial activity and reduced bacterial resistance: in vitro and in vivo evaluation
    Abdelaziz, Ahmed A.
    Elbanna, Tarek E.
    Sonbol, Fatma I.
    Gamaleldin, Noha M.
    El Maghraby, Gamal M.
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG DELIVERY, 2015, 12 (02) : 163 - 180
  • [28] Biodegradable Mg-Cu alloy implants with antibacterial activity for the treatment of osteomyelitis: In vitro and in vivo evaluations
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Lina
    Wan, Peng
    Zhai, Zanjing
    Mao, Zhenyang
    Ouyang, Zhengxiao
    Yu, Degang
    Sun, Qi
    Tan, Lili
    Ren, Ling
    Zhu, Zhenan
    Hao, Yongqiang
    Qu, Xinhua
    Yang, Ke
    Dai, Kerong
    BIOMATERIALS, 2016, 106 : 250 - 263
  • [29] Mg and Mg alloys: How comparable are in vitro and in vivo corrosion rates? A review
    Sanchez, Adela Helvia Martinez
    Luthringer, Berengere J. C.
    Feyerabend, Frank
    Willumeit, Regine
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2015, 13 : 16 - 31
  • [30] Evaluation of the osteogenesis and osseointegration of titanium alloys coated with graphene: an in vivo study
    Li, Kewen
    Wang, Chunhui
    Yan, Jinhong
    Zhang, Qi
    Dang, Baoping
    Wang, Zhuo
    Yao, Yun
    Lin, Kaifeng
    Guo, Zhongshang
    Bi, Long
    Han, Yisheng
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8