Performance of ChatGPT on Nursing Licensure Examinations in the United States and China: Cross-Sectional Study

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Zelin [1 ,2 ]
Gan, Wenyi [3 ]
Xue, Zhaowen [1 ,2 ]
Ni, Zhengxin [4 ]
Zheng, Xiaofei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yiyi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] First Affiliated Hosp, Dept Bone & Joint Surg, 613 Huangpu Ave West, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[2] First Affiliated Hosp, Sports Med Ctr, 613 Huangpu Ave West, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[3] Zhuhai Peoples Hosp, Dept Joint Surg & Sports Med, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[4] Yangzhou Univ, Sch Nursing, Yangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION | 2024年 / 10卷
关键词
artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; nursing licensure examination; nursing; LLMs; large language models; nursing education; AI; nursing student; large language model; licensing; observation; observational study; China; USA; United States of America; auxiliary tool; accuracy rate; theoretical; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.2196/52746
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: The creation of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT is an important step in the development of artificial intelligence, which shows great potential in medical education due to its powerful language understanding and generative capabilities. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate and comprehensively analyze ChatGPT's performance in handling questions for the National Nursing Licensure Examination (NNLE) in China and the United States, including the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) and the NNLE. Objective: This study aims to examine how well LLMs respond to the NCLEX-RN and the NNLE multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in various language inputs. To evaluate whether LLMs can be used as multilingual learning assistance for nursing, and to assess whether they possess a repository of professional knowledge applicable to clinical nursing practice. Methods: First, we compiled 150 NCLEX-RN Practical MCQs, 240 NNLE Theoretical MCQs, and 240 NNLE Practical MCQs. Then, the translation function of ChatGPT 3.5 was used to translate NCLEX-RN questions from English to Chinese and NNLE questions from Chinese to English. Finally, the original version and the translated version of the MCQs were inputted into ChatGPT 4.0, ChatGPT 3.5, and Google Bard. Different LLMs were compared according to the accuracy rate, and the differences between different language inputs were compared. Results: The accuracy rates of ChatGPT 4.0 for NCLEX-RN practical questions and Chinese-translated NCLEX-RN practical questions were 88.7% (133/150) and 79.3% (119/150), respectively. Despite the statistical significance of the difference (P=.03), the correct rate was generally satisfactory. Around 71.9% (169/235) of NNLE Theoretical MCQs and 69.1% (161/233) of NNLE Practical MCQs were correctly answered by ChatGPT 4.0. The accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 in processing NNLE Theoretical MCQs and NNLE Practical MCQs translated into English was 71.5% (168/235; P=.92) and 67.8% (158/233; P=.77), respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the results of text input in different languages. ChatGPT 3.5 (NCLEX-RN P=.003, NNLE Theoretical P<.001, NNLE Practical P=.12) and Google Bard (NCLEX-RN P<.001, NNLE Theoretical P<.001, NNLE Practical P<.001) had lower accuracy rates for nursing-related MCQs than ChatGPT 4.0 in English input. English accuracy was higher when compared with ChatGPT 3.5's Chinese input, and the difference was statistically significant (NCLEX-RN P=.02, NNLE Practical P=.02). Whether submitted in Chinese or English, the MCQs from the NCLEX-RN and NNLE demonstrated that ChatGPT 4.0 had the highest number of unique correct responses and the lowest number of unique incorrect responses among the 3 LLMs. Conclusions: This study, focusing on 618 nursing MCQs including NCLEX-RN and NNLE exams, found that ChatGPT 4.0 outperformed ChatGPT 3.5 and Google Bard in accuracy. It excelled in processing English and Chinese inputs, underscoring its potential as a valuable tool in nursing education and clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Psoriasis and oral health in adult United States population: a cross-sectional study
    Hussein, Mai
    Farag, Youssef M. K.
    Sonis, Stephen
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Schizophrenia and potentially preventable hospitalizations in the United States: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Cahoon, Elizabeth Khaykin
    McGinty, Emma E.
    Ford, Daniel E.
    Daumit, Gail L.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 13
  • [43] Electronic Communication Use in Ophthalmology: A Cross-sectional Study Across the United States
    Patel, Prem
    Hoyek, Sandra
    Al-Khersan, Hasenin
    Fan, Kenneth C.
    Yannuzzi, Nicolas
    Sridhar, Jayanth
    Patel, Nimesh A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [44] Schizophrenia and potentially preventable hospitalizations in the United States: a retrospective cross-sectional study
    Elizabeth Khaykin Cahoon
    Emma E McGinty
    Daniel E Ford
    Gail L Daumit
    BMC Psychiatry, 13
  • [45] Supply and Distribution of Vascular Access Physicians in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Lee, Shoou-Yih D.
    Xiang, Jie
    Kshirsagar, Abhijit, V
    Steffick, Diane
    Saran, Rajiv
    Wang, Virginia
    KIDNEY360, 2020, 1 (08): : 763 - 771
  • [46] Payments by Industry to Residency Program Directors in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Janssen, Stein J.
    Langerhuizen, David W. G.
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    Ring, David
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2022, 97 (02) : 278 - 285
  • [47] Gout Flare Burden in the United States: A Multiyear Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Morlock, Amy
    Morlock, Robert
    ACR OPEN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2025, 7 (01)
  • [48] Sleep Duration in the United States: A Cross-sectional Population-based Study
    Krueger, Patrick M.
    Friedman, Elliot M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 169 (09) : 1052 - 1063
  • [49] A cross-sectional study of social inequities in medical crowdfunding campaigns in the United States
    Kenworthy, Nora
    Dong, Zhihang
    Montgomery, Anne
    Fuller, Emily
    Berliner, Lauren
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (03):
  • [50] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF SLEEP APNEA IN ADULTS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES
    Ken-Opurum, J.
    Coaquira, J.
    Mettam, S.
    Cambron-Mellott, M. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S726 - S726