Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation and stress endplate augmentation for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis

被引:1
|
作者
Peng, Xingrui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiandi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zhuhai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie, Tianhang [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Run [1 ,2 ]
Ran, Liyu [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Xiao [1 ,2 ]
Zeng, Jiancheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthoped Res Inst, 37 GuoXue Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Reg, Dept Spine Surg, 6 TaoYuan Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Oblique lumbar interbody fusion; Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; Anterolateral screw fixation; Stress endplate augmentation; Cage subsidence; Osteoporosis; CEMENT AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-024-08401-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)combined with anterolateral screw fixation (AF) and Stress Endplate Augmentation(SEA) versus OLIF-AF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS)with osteoporosis (OP). Methods 30 patients underwent OLIF-AF-SEA (SEA group) were matched with 30 patients received OLIF-AF (control group), in terms of sex, age, body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD). Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) score of the lower back pain (VAS-LBP), leg pain (VAS-LP), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated at different postoperative intervals and comparedwith their preoperative counterparts. Radiographic outcomes such as disk height (DH), slip distance (SD), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), cage subsidence (CS) rate and fusion rate were evaluated at different postoperative intervals and compared with their preoperative counterparts. Results SEA group presented to be better at 3-month and 12-month follow-up, the VAS-LBP, VAS-LP and ODI scores of the SEA group were significantly lower than the control group (3-month SEA vs control: 2.30 +/- 0.70 vs 3.30 +/- 0.75, 2.03 +/- 0.72 vs 2.90 +/- 0.76,15.60 +/- 2.36 vs 23.23 +/- 3.07, respectively, all p<0.05. VAS-LBP and ODI 12-month SEA vs control: 1.27 +/- 0.74 vs 1.93 +/- 0.58, 12.20 +/- 1.88 vs 14.43 +/- 1.89,respectively, all p<0.05). At 24-month follow-up, both groups showed no difference in fusion rate (83.33% vs 90.00%, p=0.45), while SEA group showed a lower CS rate (13.33% vs 53.33%, p<0.05). Conclusion OLIF-AF-SEA was safe with no adverse effects and resulted in lower CS rate and better sagittal balance. OLIF-AF-SEA is a promising surgical method for treating patients with DLS-OP.
引用
收藏
页码:3467 / 3475
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unilateral pedicle screw fixation with interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative disease
    Elsheikh, Magdy O.
    Makia, Mansour A.
    Yahia, Mohamed A.
    Arnaout, Mohamed M.
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 36
  • [32] Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Conjunction with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation via the Wiltse Approach
    Yang, Shu-long
    Liu, Xiao-yin
    Ma, Rong
    Zhang, Jian-qun
    Liang, Si-min
    Chen, Zhen
    Pan, Zong
    Ma, Zong-jun
    Ding, Xiao-li
    Kang, Yi
    Wang, Zhi-qiang
    Ge, Zhao-hui
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1181 - 1190
  • [33] Additional cement augmentation reduces cage subsidence and improves clinical outcomes in oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral screw fixation: A retrospective cohort study
    Hung, Shih-Feng
    Tsai, Tsung-Ting
    Wang, Sheng-Fen
    Hsieh, Ming-Kai
    Kao, Fu-Cheng
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN SURGERY, 2024, 61 (02)
  • [34] Meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases
    Dun Liu
    Xinyu Huang
    Chongyang Zhang
    Qin Wang
    Hua Jiang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19 (1)
  • [35] Current Status of Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Takahashi, Toshiyuki
    Hanakita, Junya
    Ohtake, Yasufumi
    Funakoshi, Yusuke
    Oichi, Yuki
    Kawaoka, Taigo
    Watanabe, Mizuki
    NEUROLOGIA MEDICO-CHIRURGICA, 2016, 56 (08) : 476 - 484
  • [36] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Quante, M.
    Kesten, H.
    Richter, A.
    Halm, H.
    ORTHOPADE, 2012, 41 (02): : 153 - +
  • [37] Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
    Zhao, Long
    Xie, Tianhang
    Wang, Xiandi
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Pu, Xingxiao
    Lu, Yufei
    Zeng, Jiancheng
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [38] Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation
    Long Zhao
    Tianhang Xie
    Xiandi Wang
    Zhiqiang Yang
    Xingxiao Pu
    Yufei Lu
    Jiancheng Zeng
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [39] Retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion with anterolateral instrumentation for treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative foraminal stenosis
    Klopfenstein, JD
    Kim, LJ
    Feiz-Erfan, I
    Dickman, CA
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 2006, 65 (02): : 111 - 116
  • [40] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Study
    Du, Xing
    She, Yuxiao
    Ou, Yunsheng
    Zhu, Yong
    Luo, Wei
    Jiang, Dianming
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021 : 6693446