Tumor Volume Measurements in Animal Experiments: Current Approaches and Their Limitations

被引:0
|
作者
Puskas, Melania [1 ,2 ]
Gergics, Borbala [1 ,2 ]
Kovacs, Levente [1 ]
Drexler, Daniel Andras [1 ]
机构
[1] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr, Physiol Controls Res Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Obuda Univ, Appl Informat & Appl Math Doctoral Sch, Budapest, Hungary
关键词
tumor measurements; animal experiments; digital caliper; measurements noise; ULTRASOUND; MICROCT; MODEL; CELECOXIB; CALIPER; LIVER; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-61857-4_20
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Animal experiments are often used in cancer research as an alternative to clinical trials to determine the effect of various drugs and other biological conditions on tumor behavior. The tumor volume measurement is necessary in these experiments. The operation of imaging devices is expensive, and it is necessary to anesthetize the animals during the measurement. Anesthesiology induces stress and deviation from homeostatic functioning, which greatly affects the results of the experiment. To address these problems, the digital caliper method, which is safe and cost-effective, is applied to measure tumor volume during in vitro studies. However, it is only rarely possible to accurately measure the volume of the tumor with a digital caliper. It is, therefore, important to examine how we can estimate the three-dimensional volume of the tumor from measurements carried out with a digital caliper. This study summarizes the approximation formulas used in the literature and their scope of use and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of digital caliper measurements. We aim to highlight the importance of creating a noise model in cancer research that generally describes the difference between real tumor volumes and those measured with calipers.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 217
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative animal models for the study of lymphohematopoietic tumors: strengths and limitations of present approaches
    O'Connor, OA
    Toner, LE
    Vrhovac, R
    Budak-Alpdogan, T
    Smith, EA
    Bergman, P
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2005, 46 (07) : 973 - 992
  • [42] Animal Models for Long COVID: Current Advances, Limitations, and Future Directions
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Huan
    Li, Yumeng
    Luo, Chenxi
    Zhu, Yunkai
    Zhou, Xiaoyang
    Wang, Ruixuan
    He, Jiuxiang
    Guo, Hongxia
    Xu, Xiaofeng
    Qiu, Minyue
    Li, Jintao
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2025, 97 (02)
  • [43] Animal models of human colorectal cancer: Current status, uses and limitations
    Mittal, Vijay K.
    Bhullar, Jasneet Singh
    Jayant, Kumar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 21 (41) : 11854 - 11861
  • [44] Animal models of human colorectal cancer:Current status, uses and limitations
    Vijay K Mittal
    Jasneet Singh Bhullar
    Kumar Jayant
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, (41) : 11854 - 11861
  • [45] Current and Emerging Approaches for Spine Tumor Treatment
    Costachescu, Bogdan
    Niculescu, Adelina-Gabriela
    Iliescu, Bogdan Florin
    Dabija, Marius Gabriel
    Grumezescu, Alexandru Mihai
    Rotariu, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (24)
  • [46] The new handbook on animal experiments - a guide for authorities to apply current animal welfare legislation
    Heim, D.
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA, 2017, 219 : 25 - 25
  • [47] Comparison of Tumor Volume Measurements Using MR Images and Caliper Measurements
    Panetta, J.
    Cvetkovic, D.
    Chen, L.
    Ma, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E729 - E730
  • [48] STATISTICAL MODELS FOR ANIMAL SURVIVAL TIME IN ASCITES TUMOR EXPERIMENTS
    CHANG, PC
    BIOMETRICS, 1968, 24 (02) : 452 - &
  • [49] ESTIMATING TUMOR-INCIDENCE RATES IN ANIMAL CARCINOGENICITY EXPERIMENTS
    DINSE, GE
    BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) : 405 - 415
  • [50] Importance of research on alternatives to animal experiments and its current issues
    Ohno, Y
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 94 : 71P - 71P