Abbreviated Breast MRI for Supplemental Screening in Patients With Dense Breasts: Comparison of Baseline Versus Subsequent-Round Examinations

被引:3
|
作者
Edmonds, Christine E. [1 ]
Weinstein, Susan P. [1 ]
McDonald, Elizabeth S. [1 ]
Bagheri, Sina [1 ]
Zuckerman, Samantha P. [1 ]
O'Brien, Sophia R. [1 ]
Schnall, Mitchell D. [1 ]
Conant, Emily F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Radiol, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abbreviated breast MRI; breast can-cer screening; dense breasts; fast MRI; supplemental screening; RISK; CANCER; WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; PROTOCOL; ULTRASOUND; INTERVAL; US;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.24.31098
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) achieves a higher cancer detection rate (CDR) than digital breast tomosynthesis when applied for baseline (i.e., firstround) supplemental screening of individuals with dense breasts. Limited literature has OBJECTIVE. This study aimed to compare outcomes between baseline and subsequent rounds of screening AB-MRI in individuals with dense breasts who otherwise had an average risk for breast cancer. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients with dense breasts who otherwise had an average risk for breast cancer and underwent AB-MRI for supplemental screening between December 20, 2016, and May 10, 2023. The clinical interpretations and results of recommended biopsies for AB-MRI examinations were extracted from the EMR. Baseline and subsequent-round AB-MRI examinations were compared. RESULTS. The final sample included 2585 AB-MRI examinations (2007 baseline and 578 subsequent-round examinations) performed for supplemental screening of 2007 women (mean age, 57.1 years old) with dense breasts. Of 2007 baseline examinations, 1658 (82.6%) were assessed as BI-RADS category 1 or 2, 171 (8.5%) as BI-RADS category 3, and 178 (8.9%) as BI-RADS category 4 or 5. Of 578 subsequent-round examinations, 533 (92.2%) were assessed as BI-RADS category 1 or 2, 20 (3.5%) as BI-RADS category 3, and 25 (4.3%) as BI-RADS category 4 or 5 (p < .001). The abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) was 17.4% (349/2007) for baseline examinations versus 7.8% (45/578) for subsequent-round examinations (p < .001). For baseline examinations, PPV2 was 21.3% (38/178), PPV3 was 26.6% (38/143), and the CDR was 18.9 cancers per 1000 examinations (38/2007). For subsequent-round examinations, PPV2 was 28.0% (7/25) (p = .45), PPV3 was 29.2% (7/24) (p = .81), and the CDR was 12.1 cancers per 1000 examinations (7/578) (p = .37). All 45 cancers diagnosed by baseline or subsequent-round AB-MRI were stage 0 or 1. Seven cancers diagnosed by subsequent-round AB-MRI had a mean interval of 872 +/- 373 (SD) days since prior AB-MRI and node-negative status at surgical axillary evaluation; six had an invasive component, all measuring 1.2 cm or less. CONCLUSION. Subsequent rounds of AB-MRI screening of individuals with dense breasts had lower AIR than baseline examinations while maintaining a high CDR. All cancers detected by subsequent-round examinations were early-stage node-negative cancers. CLINICAL IMPACT. The findings support sequential AB-MRI for supplemental screening in individuals with dense breasts. Further investigations are warranted to optimize the screening interval.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Role of Supplemental Breast MRI in Screening Women with Mammographically Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (vol 6, pg 355, 2024)
    Faheem, Michael
    Tam, Hui Zhen
    Nojoum, Magd
    Suaris, Tamara
    Jahan, Noor
    Lloyd, Thomas
    Johnson, Laura
    Aggarwal, Shweta
    Ullah, MdZaker
    Thompson, Erik W.
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024,
  • [22] Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Perez, Claudia Fernandez
    Beidas, Rinad S.
    Bekelman, Justin E.
    Blumenthal, Daniel
    Mack, Elizabeth
    Bauer, Anna-Marika
    Ehsan, Sarah
    Conant, Emily F.
    Wheeler, Bernadette C.
    Guerra, Carmen E.
    Nunes, Linda W.
    Gabriel, Peter
    Doucette, Abigail
    Wileyto, E. Paul
    Buttenheim, Alison M.
    Asch, David A.
    Rendle, Katharine A.
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Ware, Sue
    Plag, Martina
    Hyland, Steven
    Gionta, Tracy
    Shulman, Lawrence N.
    Schnoll, Robert
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [23] Protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts
    Anne Marie McCarthy
    Claudia Fernandez Perez
    Rinad S. Beidas
    Justin E. Bekelman
    Daniel Blumenthal
    Elizabeth Mack
    Anna-Marika Bauer
    Sarah Ehsan
    Emily F. Conant
    Bernadette C. Wheeler
    Carmen E. Guerra
    Linda W. Nunes
    Peter Gabriel
    Abigail Doucette
    E. Paul Wileyto
    Alison M. Buttenheim
    David A. Asch
    Katharine A. Rendle
    Rachel C. Shelton
    Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju
    Sue Ware
    Martina Plag
    Steven Hyland
    Tracy Gionta
    Lawrence N. Shulman
    Robert Schnoll
    Implementation Science, 18
  • [24] Validation of Combined Deep Learning Triaging and Computer-Aided Diagnosis in 2901 Breast MRI Examinations From the Second Screening Round of the Dense Tissue and Early Breast Neoplasm Screening Trial
    Verburg, Erik
    van Gils, Carla H.
    van der Velden, Bas H. M.
    Bakker, Marije F.
    Pijnappel, Ruud M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Gilhuijs, Kenneth G. A.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2023, 58 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [25] Design and interim review of a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized clinical trial testing behavioral economic implementation strategies to increase supplemental breast MRI screening among patients with extremely dense breasts
    Mack, Elizabeth
    Blumenthal, Daniel
    Perez, Claudia Fernandez
    Beidas, Rinad
    Bekelman, Justin
    Asch, David A.
    Bauer, Anna-Marika
    Buttenheim, Alison M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    Doucette, Abigail
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Gabriel, Peter
    Guerra, Carmen
    Nunes, Linda W.
    Plag, Martina
    Rendle, Katharine A.
    Shelton, Rachel C.
    Shulman, Lawrence
    Ware, Sue
    Wheeler, Bernadette C.
    Wileyto, Paul
    Schnoll, Robert
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2024, 33 (09)
  • [26] Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammogram-based Deep Learning and Traditional Breast Cancer Risk Models in Patients Who Underwent Supplemental Screening with MRI
    Lamb, Leslie R.
    Mercaldo, Sarah F.
    Ghaderi, Kimeya
    Carney, Andrew
    Lehman, Constance D.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 308 (03)