Risk factors and complications in immediate pre-pectoral breast reconstructions with BRAXON®Fast acellular dermal matrix after skin-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies

被引:0
|
作者
Doyle, Belma [1 ,2 ]
Matthews, Emily Kate [1 ]
Murray, Kiera [1 ]
Barber, Zoe [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cwm Taf Morgannwg Univ Hlth Board, Snowdrop Breast Ctr, Abercynon, Wales
[2] Cwm Taf Morgannwg Univ Hlth Board, Neath Port Talbot Hosp, Breast Unit, Baglan Way, Abercynon SA12 7BX, Wales
关键词
Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR); acellular dermal matrix (ADM); BRAXON (R) Fast; skin-reducing mastectomy; skin-sparing mastectomy; AUGMENTATION;
D O I
10.21037/abs-23-78
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The practice of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, particularly using biological meshes, has become more popular. Despite its increased use, there is a shortage of high-quality evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. This study presents an institutional experience and outcomes of performing the procedure using BRAXON (R) Fast acellular dermal matrix (ADM) exclusively in conjunction with Motiva (R) Ergonomix (R) breast implant. Methods: The study retrospectively collected data from November 2020 to October 2023 at Neath Port Talbot Hospital, Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board in Wales. The data included information on patients who underwent immediate implant reconstruction with ADM. Parameters such as age, body mass index (BMI), implant size, mastectomy weight and risk factors for post-operative complications were examined. Risk factors considered were neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, tobacco use, immunosuppression therapy, diabetes mellitus, and breast size. The analysis focused on early complications, encompassing infection, tissue necrosis, seroma, hematoma, and implant loss. Additionally, the study recorded the time needed to wrap the implant within the BRAXON (R) Fast ADM. Results: In this study with 55 patients (64 breasts), two oncoplastic breast surgeons performed skin-reducing or skin/nipple sparing mastectomies. Immediate pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using 3D BRAXON (R) Fast ADM and Motiva (R) Ergonomix (R) implants was performed in all patients. The average implant volume was 385 cc, and the average patient age was 47 (+/- 9.4) years. The BMI was greater than 30 kg/m(2) in 25% of patients. Out of the total cases, 26 (41.3%) underwent nipple-sparing mastectomies, while 37 (58.7%) had skin-sparing and nipple-sacrificing mastectomies, with an average breast weight of 384 (+/- 100.2) g. In the study, the overall complication rate was 18.7%. Infections, comprising 10.9%, led to two cases requiring a return to the operating room and resulting in implant loss. Skin necrosis, either full thickness or superficial, occurred in 12.5% of cases, with full thickness necrosis causing an additional two implant losses, totalling 4 (6.2%) implant losses. Seroma occurred in only 1 (1.6%) of patient, and there were 10.9% re-admissions and returns to the operating room. The average time needed to encapsulate the implant within BRAXON (R) Fast was 3.26 minutes, with a range from 2.43 to 4.38 minutes. Conclusions: Immediate pre-pectoral implant-based reconstruction with BRAXON (R) Fast is safe for patients undergoing mastectomy, whether for therapeutic or prophylactic reasons. The use of tear-shaped, pre-made BRAXON (R) Fast aids in rapid encapsulation of the implant, potentially reducing exposure to the external environment. While factors like BMI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy did not significantly impact complication rates, it is crucial to engage in comprehensive discussions with each patient regarding surgical risks and potential quality-of-life benefits. Special attention should be given to individual risk factors such as immunosuppression therapy and smoking status to facilitate informed decision-making for breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Examining and comparing the temporal changes and results of cosmetic, quality of life and patient satisfaction achieved with immediate and delayed-immediate implant-based breast reconstruction procedures and contralateral symmetrisation techniques after skin-sparing mastectomies with unilateral simple mastectomy and with bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies and immediate implant-based breast reconstructive surgeries.
    Ujhelyi, Mihaly
    Savolt, Akos
    Huszar, Orsolya
    Ping, Orsolya
    Meszaros, Norbert
    Jani, Nora
    Ujlaki, Matyas
    Kenessey, Istvan
    Jozsef, Zsofia
    Matrai, Zoltan
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [32] Complications, risk factors, and patients-reported outcomes after skin-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction in women with BRCA mutations
    Moberg, Ingvild O.
    Bredal, Inger Schou
    Schneider, Michael R.
    Tonseth, Kim A.
    Schlichting, Ellen
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2018, 52 (04) : 234 - 239
  • [33] Immediate and Long-term Complications of Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction after Nipple- or Skin-sparing Mastectomy
    Lam, Thomas C.
    Hsieh, Frank
    Salinas, James
    Boyages, John
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (11)
  • [34] The evolving role of pre-pectoral acellular dermal matrix-assisted approach in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: A prospective observational study
    Tayeh, Salim
    Chehade, Hiba El Hage
    Manson, Aisling
    Mokbel, Kefah
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [35] Bilateral prophylactic skin-reducing nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using only a vascularized dermal–subcutaneous pedicle: technique and possible advantages
    Thomas Vrekoussis
    Marta Perabo
    Isabelle Himsl
    Maria Günthner-Biller
    Darius Dian
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013, 287 : 749 - 753
  • [36] Bilateral prophylactic skin-reducing nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction using only a vascularized dermal-subcutaneous pedicle: technique and possible advantages
    Vrekoussis, Thomas
    Perabo, Marta
    Himsl, Isabelle
    Guenthner-Biller, Maria
    Dian, Darius
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2013, 287 (04) : 749 - 753
  • [37] A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria
    Woerdeman, Leonie A. E.
    Hage, J. Joris
    Hofland, Marjolein M. I.
    Rutgers, Emiel J. Th.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 119 (02) : 455 - 463
  • [38] Immediate Breast Reconstruction (IBR) After Skin-sparing Mastectomy (SSM) Does Not Increase the Risk of Loco Regional Recurrence or Distant Metastases
    van Mierlo, D.
    Schipper, R.
    van Waardhuizen, O.
    Martens, M.
    Peeters, W.
    Boetes, C.
    Heuts, E.
    Smidt, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S372 - S373
  • [39] Vertical-scar skin pattern with laterally-based dermal flaps for direct, implant-breast reconstruction following risk-reducing skin-sparing mastectomy in macromastia
    Naji, S.
    Nassab, R.
    Iqbal, A.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (10): : E240 - E241
  • [40] A Meta-analysis of Outcomes Using Acellular Dermal Matrix in Breast and Abdominal Wall Reconstructions Event Rates and Risk Factors Predictive of Complications
    Adetayo, Oluwaseun A.
    Salcedo, Samuel E.
    Bahjri, Khaled
    Gupta, Subhas C.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 77 (02) : E31 - E38