European legal standards of digitalization of the judiciary

被引:0
|
作者
Najafli, Emin [1 ,2 ]
Ponomarov, Sergiy [3 ]
Koverznev, Vadym [4 ]
Ivanov, Andrii [5 ]
机构
[1] Kharkiv Natl Univ Internal Affairs, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Kharkiv Diplomat Club, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[3] State Serv Special Commun & Informat Protect Ukrai, Dept State Regulat Field Commun Serv, Kyiv, Ukraine
[4] NAS Ukraine, V Mamutov Inst Econ & Legal Res, Kyiv, Ukraine
[5] State Serv Special Commun & Informat Protect Ukrai, Dept State Regulat Field Commun Serv, Kyiv, Ukraine
来源
AMAZONIA INVESTIGA | 2024年 / 13卷 / 76期
关键词
digitalization; judiciary; e-court; e-; justice; rule of law; implementation; legal standards;
D O I
10.34069/AI/2024.76.04.10
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The article reveals the content of the concept of European legal standards in the area of digitalization of the judiciary adopted as mandatory or as recommendatory typical legal principles and norms fixed (contained) in common sources of law (acquis communautaire) of the European legal system. They are the minimum legal requirements for the organization and implementation of e -justice for the EU member states. The application of these standards takes place in the course of their implementation by national laws of both the EU member states and states that are guided by the legal values of the EU and/or seek to acquire EU membership, like Ukraine. The normative basis, goals and principles of ejustice in the EU are thoroughly analysed. The key positions on the digitalization of the judiciary, which are set out in the EU legal documents containing the relevant legal standards, are defined. Attention is drawn to the fact that the main elements of e -justice, implemented in Ukraine under the influence of European standards, can be considered the following: (i) conducting electronic office work, centralized storage of cases and other procedural documents in a single database; (ii) exchange of documents and information; (iii) electronic method of determining a judge (judgerapporteur) to consider a particular case; (iv) using information and communication technologies to investigate electronic evidence; (v) trial participation in the hearing via videoconference; (vi) adoption and publication of judicial acts in electronic form.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 127
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anchoring Legal Standards
    Feldman, Yuval
    Schurr, Amos
    Teichman, Doron
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2016, 13 (02) : 298 - 329
  • [32] COMMENTARY ON LEGAL STANDARDS
    BUEHLER, RMC
    [J]. EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 1993, 59 (03) : 280 - 280
  • [33] Adjusting legal standards
    Lavie, Shay
    Ganor, Tal
    Feldman, Yuval
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2020, 49 (01) : 33 - 53
  • [34] LEGAL STANDARDS FOR DRUGS
    Parker, Linette A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1922, 22 (10) : 809 - 811
  • [35] The judiciary system as a productivity factor; the European experience
    Tsintzos, Panagiotis
    Plakandaras, Vasilios
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 192
  • [36] Adjusting legal standards
    Shay Lavie
    Tal Ganor
    Yuval Feldman
    [J]. European Journal of Law and Economics, 2020, 49 : 33 - 53
  • [37] LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF STANDARDS
    SWANKIN, DA
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1983, 406 : 6 - 11
  • [38] STANDARDS OF LEGAL EDUCATION
    Willes, Hugh E.
    [J]. SCHOOL AND SOCIETY, 1921, 13 (314): : 9 - 14
  • [39] Building a European Judiciary and the safeguards of its independence
    Magaldi, Nuria
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 2022, 42 (125): : 127 - 157
  • [40] The Impact of Digitalization on Happiness: A European Perspective
    Ionescu-Feleaga, Liliana
    Ionescu, Bogdan-Stefan
    Stoica, Oana Cristina
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (15)