Treatment Results of Carotid Artery Stenting with an Open-Cell Stent: Analysis of 734 Consecutive Cases at a Single Center

被引:0
|
作者
Omura, Yoshihiro [1 ,2 ]
Imamura, Hirotoshi [1 ]
Tani, Shoichi [1 ]
Adachi, Hidemitsu [1 ]
Sakaguchi, Manabu [3 ]
Todo, Kenichi [3 ]
Yamagami, Hiroshi [3 ]
Goto, Masanori [1 ]
Ohara, Nobuyuki [3 ]
Fukumitsu, Ryu [1 ]
Sunohara, Tadashi [1 ]
Matsumoto, Shirabe [1 ]
Fukui, Nobuyuki [1 ]
Fukuda, Tatsumaru [1 ]
Akiyama, Tomoaki [1 ]
Ohta, Tsuyoshi [1 ]
Sakai, Chiaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe City Med Ctr Gen Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
[2] Tokyo Womens Med Univ Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kobe City Med Ctr Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
关键词
Carotid artery stenting; Open; cell stent; Stroke; HIGH-RISK; ENDARTERECTOMY; PLAQUE; RESTENOSIS; PROTECTION; PREDICTORS; OUTCOMES; DESIGN; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.108
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: In carotid artery stenting (CAS) for internal carotid artery stenosis, the stent is often selected according to the plaque properties and arterial tortuosity. In our institute, an open-cell stent is used as the first-line stent regardless of the characteristics of the lesion. This study was performed to examine the outcome of CAS with an open-cell stent as the real-world results. METHODS: In total, 811 CAS procedures using open-cell stents were performed for internal carotid artery stenosis from April 2002 to December 2019. Of these patients, we excluded those with hyperacute conditions for which CAS was performed within 3 days of onset, those in whom acute mechanical thrombectomy was performed simultaneously with CAS, and those with stenosis due to arterial dissection. Thus, 734 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes and risk factors for perioperative infarction were investigated. RESULTS: The periprocedural stroke rate and mortality rate were 3.7% (27/734) and 0.4% (3/734), respectively. Lowechoic plaque was a significant risk factor for periprocedural stroke in both univariate ( P < 0.03) and multivariate (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 e6.66; P [ 0.02) analyses. Cerebral infarction and high grade restenosis were observed in 15 (2.0%) and 17 (2.3%) patients during a median 50-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CAS with open-cell stents showed good results in terms of both the postoperative stroke incidence and long-term severe restenosis rate. However, low-echoic plaque was a risk factor for perioperative stroke incidence, which should be considered when deciding on the indication for CAS with an open-cell stent.
引用
收藏
页码:E453 / E459
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Open-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stenting DISCUSSION
    Hamidan, Allen
    Pierce, Damon S.
    Alipour, Massoud
    Hsu, Jeffrey
    Back, Martin
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 49 (03) : 606 - 606
  • [22] Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents Clinical article
    Park, Keun Young
    Kim, Dong Ik
    Kim, Byung Moon
    Nam, Hyo Suk
    Kim, Young Dae
    Heo, Ji Hoe
    Kim, Dong Joon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 119 (03) : 642 - 647
  • [23] Carotid Artery Stenting in Acute Stroke Using a Microporous Stent Device: A Single-Center Experience
    Lamanna, Anthony
    Maingard, Julian
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Barras, Christen
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Thijs, Vincent
    Chandra, Ronil
    Brooks, Duncan Mark
    Asadi, Hamed
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 127 : E1003 - E1012
  • [24] A Comparative Quantitative Analysis of Embolic Filter Debris Load During Carotid Artery Stenting Between Open-Cell, Closed-Cell, and Micromesh
    Antonello, Michele
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Xodo, Andrea
    Chincarini, Chiara
    Grego, Franco
    Piazza, Michele
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (05) : E166 - E167
  • [25] Endovascular treatment of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting:: Immediate and midterm results
    Reimers, Bernhard
    Tuebler, Thilo
    De Donato, Giammarco
    Della Barbera, Mila
    Cernetti, Carlo
    Schlueter, Michael
    Mistrorigo, Flavio
    Sacca, Salvatore
    Favero, Luca
    Setacci, Francesco
    Setacci, Carlo
    Thiene, Gaetano
    Schofer, Joachim
    Angelini, Annalisa
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 (04) : 429 - 435
  • [26] A single center experiece of carotid artery stenting without protection devices for the treatment of obstructive extracranial carotid artery disease
    Pamidimukkala, V.
    Mbr, R.
    Polavarapu, A.
    Polavarapu, N.
    Bawkar, S.
    Narona, M.
    Polavarapu, R.
    Khambhati, B.
    Thakkar, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2014, 9 : 200 - 200
  • [27] Percutaneous stenting treatment in symptomatic carotid artery disease: A single-center experience
    Ersoy, Elif Ilkay Yuce
    Baris, Veysel Ozgur
    Karaca, Ozkan
    Sakalli, Sedat
    Kaya, Emin Erdem
    Yasin, Sedat
    Vuruskan, Ertan
    Hosgor, Yusuf
    Turkmen, Serdar
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 26 : S122 - S123
  • [28] Regarding "Open-cell versus closed-cell stent design differences in blood flow velocities after carotid stenting" Reply
    Pierce, Damon Scott
    Rosero, Eric B.
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 50 (02) : 477 - 477
  • [29] Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization
    Timaran, Carlos H.
    Rosero, Eric B.
    Higuera, Adriana
    Ilarraza, Adriana
    Modrall, J. Gregory
    Clagett, G. Patrick
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 54 (05) : 1310 - 1316
  • [30] Results of carotid stenting in patients with contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion: a retrospective single-center analysis and 22 years of experience
    Esra Kochan Kizilkilic
    Yeşim Namdar Akan
    Baran Atbas
    Seyfullah Halit Karagöz
    Bora Korkmazer
    Serdar Arslan
    Civan Islak
    Naci Kocer
    Osman Kizilkilic
    Neuroradiology, 2025, 67 (2) : 393 - 401