Has China's Carbon Emissions Trading Policy Induced Energy Conservation and Emissions Reduction in the Power Sector

被引:0
|
作者
Shi, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Jing-Yue [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[3] Jiangxi Acad Sci, Inst Energy Res, Nanchang 330096, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon dioxide; Economics; Technological innovation; Green products; Investment; Finance; Emissions trading; Carbon emissions trading (CET); difference-in-differences; energy conservation and emissions reduction; power sector; renewable power generation; ABATEMENT COST; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2024.3450523
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy is a major market-oriented environmental policy that promotes energy conservation and emissions reduction. However, it is still in the initial stage of development, and its effectiveness is still highly controversial. Therefore, this article employs the difference-in-differences and event study methods to determine whether China's CET policy can promote energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector based on a comprehensive dataset containing power enterprise, power sectoral, and provincial data from 2005 to 2021. The results indicate that China's CET policy has significantly reduced CO2 emissions in the power sector by 12.4% during the sample period, but it has no significant effect on energy conservation; in addition, China's CET policy has not exerted an expectation effect on energy conservation and emissions reduction in the power sector but has a three-year lag effect; finally, investing in renewable power generation has become the primary measure for power sector to respond to CET regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:14326 / 14338
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Carbon emissions control policies in China's power generation sector
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    Schoengold, Karina
    [J]. CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 3 (03) : 350 - 368
  • [32] Has China's Pilot Emissions Trading Scheme Influenced the Carbon Intensity of Output?
    Zhang, Kangkang
    Xu, Deyi
    Li, Shiran
    Zhou, Na
    Xiong, Jinhui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (10)
  • [33] The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission of China’s power industry: mechanism and spatial spillover effect
    Xiaodong Ma
    Qingqiu Xu
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 74207 - 74222
  • [34] The impact of carbon emissions trading policy on carbon emission of China's power industry: mechanism and spatial spillover effect
    Ma, Xiaodong
    Xu, Qingqiu
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (29) : 74207 - 74222
  • [35] Analysis of the Impact of China's Emissions Trading Scheme on Reducing Carbon Emissions
    Zhang Haijun
    Duan Maosheng
    Zhang Peng
    [J]. INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 3596 - 3601
  • [36] A study of the rebound effect on China's current energy conservation and emissions reduction: Measures and policy choices
    Lin, Boqiang
    Yang, Fang
    Liu, Xia
    [J]. ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 330 - 339
  • [37] Impact of Chinese Carbon Emissions Trading Policy on Chongqing's Carbon Emissions and Economic Development
    Ju, Xiaoyu
    Wan, Jie
    Zhang, Ziwei
    Ma, Chunai
    Zhang, Liangwei
    Zhao, Xiaodong
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [38] How does carbon emissions trading affect China's energy intensity?
    Zha, Donglan
    Xu, Ting
    Wang, Mei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASIA PACIFIC ECONOMY, 2024,
  • [39] The policy-driven peak and reduction of China's carbon emissions
    Qi Ye
    Stern, Nicholas
    He Jian-Kun
    Lu Jia-Qi
    Liu Tian-Le
    King, David
    Wu Tong
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (02) : 65 - 71
  • [40] China's carbon emissions trading and stock returns
    Wen, Fenghua
    Wu, Nan
    Gong, Xu
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 86