Adverse pregnancy outcome in fetuses with early increased nuchal translucency: prospective cohort study

被引:3
|
作者
Bet, B. B. [1 ,2 ]
Lugthart, M. A. [1 ,2 ]
Linskens, I. H. [2 ,3 ]
van Maarle, M. C. [4 ]
van Leeuwen, E. [1 ,2 ]
Pajkrt, E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC locat, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Reprod & Dev, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam UMC locat Vrije Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC locat, Dept Clin Genet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
adverse pregnancy outcome; aneuploidy screening; chromosomal anomaly; first-trimester anomaly scan; genetic disorder; invasive prenatal testing; non-invasive prenatal test; nuchal translucency; structural anomaly; CROWN-RUMP LENGTH; CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS; 1ST TRIMESTER; MATERNAL AGE; TRISOMY-21; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.27623
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives An increased nuchal translucency (NT) thickness of >= 3.5 mm is a well-established marker for congenital anomalies and adverse pregnancy outcome between 11 and 14 weeks' gestation, but little is known about its performance as a screening tool before 11 weeks. We aimed to investigate, in a prospective setting, whether fetuses with increased NT before 11 weeks are at risk for adverse pregnancy outcome. Methods This was a prospective cohort study including pregnant women with a viable fetus with NT >= 2.5 mm and a crown-rump length (CRL) < 45 mm. All included women were referred to our fetal medicine unit (FMU) and scheduled for a follow-up scan where the NT was remeasured after 1 week when the CRL was > 45 mm. Two groups were evaluated: cases with a normalized NT (< 3.5 mm) and cases with persistently increased NT (>= 3.5 mm). The cases were monitored until 4 weeks after delivery. The main outcome was a composite adverse outcome of aneuploidy, other genetic disorders, structural anomalies and pregnancy loss. We performed subgroup analyses of NT thickness at inclusion and normalized or persistently increased NT at follow-up. Results The study included 109 cases, of which 39 (35.8%) had an adverse pregnancy outcome. Of these, 64.1% (25/39) were aneuploid, corresponding to 22.9% (25/109) of the total study population. In the subgroups of NT thickness at inclusion of 2.5-3.4 mm, 3.5-4.4 mm and >= 4.5 mm, an adverse outcome was reported in 22.0% (9/41), 40.0% (18/45) and 52.2% (12/23), respectively. In fetuses with a normalized NT and without ultrasound abnormalities at the follow-up scan, the incidence of adverse outcome was 8.5% (5/59), of which 5.1% (3/59) cases were aneuploid. Conclusions Fetuses with an early increased NT thickness are at considerable risk of an adverse pregnancy outcome, even if the NT normalizes after 11 weeks. Not all congenital anomalies can be diagnosed with routine first-trimester screening, such as non-invasive prenatal testing and/or a first-trimester anomaly scan. Therefore, expectant parents should always be referred to a FMU for detailed ultrasonography. Invasive prenatal testing should be offered if an increased NT of >= 2.5 mm is observed before 11 weeks' gestation. (c) 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pregnancy outcomes of normal karyotype fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
    Niroomanesh, Shirin
    Nadimzadeh, Narges
    Rahimi-Sharbaf, Fatemeh
    Shirazi, Mahboobeh
    Golshahi, Fatemeh
    Sahebdel, Behrokh
    Feizabad, Elham
    CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2023, 14 (04) : 732 - 736
  • [22] Prenatal course and pregnancy outcome of fetuses with a transient nuchal translucency
    Fukada, Y
    Amemiya, A
    Kohno, K
    Sunami, R
    Kobayashi, Y
    Hoshi, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2002, 79 (03) : 225 - 228
  • [23] Increased nuchal translucency in chromosomally normal fetuses and pregnancy outcomes - a retrospective study
    Bijok, Julia
    Ziora-Jakutowicz, Karolina
    Ilnicka, Alicja
    Pawlowska, Barbara
    Jozwiak, Anna
    Dangel, Joanna
    Jakiel, Grzegorz
    Roszkowski, Tomasz
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2013, 84 (03) : 172 - 179
  • [24] Nuchal translucency measurement and pregnancy outcome in karyotypically normal fetuses
    Michailidis, GD
    Economides, DL
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 17 (02) : 102 - 105
  • [25] CHROMOSOMAL DEFECTS AND OUTCOME IN 1015 FETUSES WITH INCREASED NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY
    PANDYA, PP
    KONDYLIOS, A
    HILBERT, L
    SNIJDERS, RJM
    NICOLAIDES, KH
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [26] Pregnancy outcome and nuchal translucency measurements in fetuses with a normal karyotype
    Pajkrt, E
    Mol, BWJ
    Bleker, OP
    Bilardo, CM
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1999, 19 (12) : 1104 - 1108
  • [27] Does a 'notched' nuchal translucency indicate Down syndrome fetuses or other adverse pregnancy outcome?
    Maymon, R
    Dreazen, E
    Buckovsky, I
    Weinraub, Z
    Herman, A
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2001, 21 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [28] Outcome of the fetuses with severely increased nuchal translucency thickness in the first trimester
    Nakamura, Yasushi
    Fujita, Satoko
    Yamada, Kenji
    Song, Mihyon
    Tajima, Atsushi
    Matsumoto, Junko
    Kihira, Chikara
    Kurata, Yoshie
    Arakawa, Hiromi
    Tamura, Chieko
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (10) : 1977 - 1981
  • [29] Pregnancy outcome and infant follow-up of fetuses with abnormally increased first trimester nuchal translucency
    Maymon, R
    Jauniaux, E
    Cohen, O
    Dreazen, E
    Weinraub, Z
    Herman, A
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (09) : 2023 - 2027
  • [30] By how much does increased nuchal translucency increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome in chromosomally normal fetuses?: A study of 16260 fetuses derived from an unselected pregnant population
    Westin, M.
    Saltvedt, S.
    Almstrom, H.
    Grunewald, C.
    Valentin, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (02) : 150 - 158